Yu Bin, Chen Wen-Chuan, Lee Pei-Yuan, Lin Kang-Ping, Lin Kun-Jhih, Tsai Cheng-Lun, Wei Hung-Wen
a Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology , Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University , GuangZhou , China.
b Technology Translation Center for Medical Device , Chung Yuan Christian University , Taoyuan , Taiwan.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2016 Oct;19(13):1363-70. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1142534. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
Initial stability is essential for open reduction internal fixation of intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Geometrical feature of a calcaneal plate is influential to its endurance under physiological load. It is unclear if conventional and pre-contoured anatomical calcaneal plates may exhibit differently in biomechanical perspective. A Sanders' Type II-B intraarticular calcaneal fracture model was reconstructed to evaluate the effectiveness of calcaneal plates using finite element methods. Incremental vertical joint loads up to 450 N were exerted on the subtalar joint to evaluate the stability and safety of the calcaneal plates and bony structure. Results revealed that the anatomical calcaneal plate model had greater average structural stiffness (585.7 N/mm) and lower von Mises stress on the plate (774.5 MPa) compared to those observed in the conventional calcaneal plate model (stiffness: 430.9 N/mm; stress on plate: 867.1 MPa). Although both maximal compressive and maximal tensile stress and strain were lower in the anatomical calcaneal plate group, greater loads on fixation screws were found (average 172.7 MPa compared to 82.18 MPa in the conventional calcaneal plate). It was noted that high magnitude stress concentrations would occur where the bone plate bridges the fracture line on the lateral side of the calcaneus bone. Sufficient fixation strength at the posterolateral calcaneus bone is important for maintaining subtalar joint load after reduction and fixation of a Sanders' Type II-B calcaneal fracture. In addition, geometrical design of a calcaneal plate should worth considering for the mechanical safety in practical usage.
初始稳定性对于关节内跟骨骨折切开复位内固定至关重要。跟骨钢板的几何特征对其在生理负荷下的耐久性有影响。传统的和预塑形的解剖型跟骨钢板在生物力学方面是否表现不同尚不清楚。构建了Sanders II - B型关节内跟骨骨折模型,采用有限元方法评估跟骨钢板的有效性。在距下关节施加高达450 N的递增垂直关节负荷,以评估跟骨钢板和骨结构的稳定性和安全性。结果显示,与传统跟骨钢板模型(刚度:430.9 N/mm;钢板应力:867.1 MPa)相比,解剖型跟骨钢板模型具有更大的平均结构刚度(585.7 N/mm),且钢板上的von Mises应力更低(774.5 MPa)。虽然解剖型跟骨钢板组的最大压缩应力、最大拉伸应力和应变均较低,但发现固定螺钉上的负荷更大(平均172.7 MPa,而传统跟骨钢板为82.18 MPa)。值得注意的是,在跟骨外侧骨板跨过骨折线处会出现高应力集中。跟骨后外侧骨足够的固定强度对于Sanders II - B型跟骨骨折复位固定后维持距下关节负荷很重要。此外,为了实际使用中的机械安全性,跟骨钢板的几何设计值得考虑。