Unveiling ficolins: diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers linked to the Tumor Microenvironment in Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND

Ficolins (FCNs) are a family of proteins, comprising FCN1, FCN2 and FCN3, and integral to the immune system which have been implicated in the onset and progression of tumors. Despite their recognized roles, a comprehensive analysis of FCNs in lung cancer remains elusive.

METHODS

We employed a variety of bioinformatics tools, including UCSC, SangerBox, Ualcan, cBioPortal, String, Metascape, GeneMANIA, TIDE, CTD, and CAMP databases to investigate the differential expression, diagnostic and prognostic significance, genetic alterations, functional enrichment, immune infiltration, and potential immunotherapeutic implications of FCN1, FCN2, and FCN3 in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Additionally, RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry were utilized to validate the expressions of FCNs at the mRNA and protein levels in LUSC and LUAD.

RESULTS

Our comprehensive bioinformatic analysis, supported by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry, revealed that the expressions of FCN1, FCN2 and FCN3 were consistently downregulated in both LUSC and LUAD tumor tissues. FCNs demonstrated significant diagnostic potential for LUSC and LUAD, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for FCN1 and FCN3 exceeding 0.90. Furthermore, FCN2 and FCN3 showed a strong negative correlation with overall survival (OS) in LUSC, whereas FCN1 and FCN2 were positively correlated with OS in LUAD, suggesting their prognostic value in lung cancer. Gene enrichment analysis indicated that FCNs were predominantly associated with the complement system and complement activation pathways. Immune infiltration analysis further revealed a significant positive correlation between FCNs and the presence of neutrophils and resting mast cells. Our analysis of immunotherapy outcomes revealed a significant disparity in the immunophenoscore (IPS) among lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), distinguishing those with high FCN expression from those with low FCN expression. Additionally, we identified small molecule compounds related to FCNs and drugs pertinent to LUSC and LUAD.

CONCLUSION

FCNs held promise as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for LUSC and LUAD. This study also elucidated the relationship of FCNs with the tumor microenvironment, offering novel insights into the immunotherapeutic landscape for LUSC and LUAD.