Suppr超能文献

虚拟现实催眠镇静对局部麻醉下端口植入围手术期疼痛和焦虑的影响:一项随机对照试验(VIP试验)

Impact of virtual reality hypnosedation on perioperative pain and anxiety in port implantation under local anesthesia: a randomized controlled pilot trial (VIP Trial).

作者信息

Steinkraus Kira C, Feldmann Hannah, Hunold Lisa S, Graf Sandra, Dörr-Harim Colette, Nasir Nadir, Michalski Christoph W, Hüttner Felix J

机构信息

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

Clinical Trial Centre, Department of Surgery ulmCARES, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Oct 10;13(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00454-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This monocentric randomized controlled pilot trial investigates the impact of virtual reality (VR) hypnosedation on perioperative anxiety, pain, patient satisfaction, and medication usage during port implantation under local anesthesia.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients undergoing elective port implantation between January 2022 and August 2023 were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a VR hypnosedation group or a control group. The VR group used a commercially available VR headset with the HypnoVR application, providing various environments, musical backgrounds, and a guiding voice, while the control group underwent the procedure without VR. Patients with ASA > 3, chronic pain, cognitive issues, and contraindications against VR use were excluded. The main outcomes measured were perioperative pain and anxiety scores, with secondary outcomes including perioperative medication usage. Due to the nature of the interventions, blinding of patients and physicians was not feasible. Statistical analysis was primarily descriptive and exploratory, focusing on estimating effect sizes for future trials.

RESULTS

The study found no significant differences in immediate postoperative pain with 1.43 ± 1.63 vs. 1.6 ± 2.05 (p = 0.62) or anxiety scores 30.65 ± 9.13 vs. 31.78 ± 13.34 (p = 0.60) between the no VR and VR group, respectively. Additionally, there was a trend to less usage of certain medications, particularly remifentanil (mean dose of 200 mg vs. 100 mg (p = 0.12)) and novaminsulfon (mean dose of 1250 mg vs. 900 mg (p = 0.26)) in the VR group vs. no VR group, respectively. However, these differences were not statistically significant and therefore no definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding medication usage based on this data.

CONCLUSION

While VR hypnosedation did not significantly reduce perioperative pain or anxiety in this pilot trial, the observed trends in reduced medication usage suggest potential benefits. These findings warrant further investigation in larger, confirmatory trials to better understand the role of VR in enhancing patient comfort and potentially reducing reliance on pharmacological interventions during surgical procedures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00028508; registration date 15 March 2022; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1275-4995.

摘要

背景

本单中心随机对照试验研究虚拟现实(VR)催眠镇静对局部麻醉下端口植入术中围手术期焦虑、疼痛、患者满意度及药物使用的影响。

方法

共纳入2022年1月至2023年8月期间接受择期端口植入术的120例患者,按1:1比例随机分为VR催眠镇静组和对照组。VR组使用配备HypnoVR应用程序的商用VR头戴设备,该程序提供各种环境、音乐背景及引导语音,而对照组在无VR的情况下进行手术。排除美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级>3级、有慢性疼痛、认知问题及VR使用禁忌证的患者。主要测量指标为围手术期疼痛和焦虑评分,次要指标包括围手术期药物使用情况。由于干预措施的性质,患者和医生无法进行盲法。统计分析主要为描述性和探索性,重点是估计未来试验的效应大小。

结果

研究发现,无VR组和VR组术后即刻疼痛评分分别为1.43±1.63和1.6±2.05(p = 0.62),焦虑评分分别为30.65±9.13和31.78±13.34(p = 0.60),两组之间无显著差异。此外,VR组与无VR组相比,某些药物的使用有减少趋势,尤其是瑞芬太尼(平均剂量分别为200mg和100mg(p = 0.12))和新维生素磺(平均剂量分别为1250mg和900mg(p = 0.26))。然而,这些差异无统计学意义,因此基于该数据无法就药物使用得出明确结论。

结论

虽然在本试验中VR催眠镇静未显著降低围手术期疼痛或焦虑,但观察到的药物使用减少趋势提示了潜在益处。这些发现值得在更大规模的验证性试验中进一步研究,以更好地了解VR在提高患者舒适度以及可能减少手术过程中对药物干预的依赖方面的作用。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册中心:DRKS00028508;注册日期2022年3月15日;通用试验编号:U1111 - 1275 - 4995。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0710/11465779/e76fe1e29cd6/13741_2024_454_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验