Badnaware Sheetal D, Kakade Adesh, Takate Vilas, Juneja Akanksha, Shetty Heeresh, Santosh Anitha, Khairnar Mahesh R
Unit of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Nair Hospital Dental College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jun;17(6):653-657. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2885.
This study aimed to assess the efficacy of root canal debris removal in primary teeth through irrigation using the Endo-Irrigator Plus (CWAIS).
A total of 25 primary mandibular first molars were divided into five groups, with five teeth in each group. After determining the working length and performing biomechanical preparation, groups I and II were subjected to hand and rotary instrumentation (ProTaper, Dentsply, United States of America) with conventional syringe irrigation with positive pressure, while groups III and IV were instrumented using hand and rotary instrumentation with positive and negative pressure irrigation employing the Endo-Irrigator Plus (CWAIS) system. Sodium hypochlorite (5.25%) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (17%) were used as irrigants. Group V served as the control group, undergoing only root canal access opening. The removal of the smear layer was analyzed at the cervical, middle, and apical thirds of the canal using environmental scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical significance was set at < 0.05.
Statistically significant differences were observed among all groups at the cervical, middle, and apical levels ( < 0.05). Groups III and IV exhibited significantly lower smear scores at all levels, particularly in the apical third, as observed through SEM examination.
The use of the Endo-Irrigator Plus (CWAIS) system demonstrated superior debridement of intracanal debris in primary teeth compared to the positive pressure irrigation method.
Badnaware SD, Kakade A, Takate V, Efficacy of Apical Negative Pressure Irrigation in Primary Teeth: A Smear Layer Analysis. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(6):653-657.
本研究旨在评估使用Endo-Irrigator Plus(CWAIS)冲洗去除乳牙根管内碎屑的效果。
将25颗下颌第一乳磨牙分为五组,每组5颗牙。确定工作长度并进行生物力学预备后,第一组和第二组采用手用和旋转器械(ProTaper,登士柏,美国),并用传统注射器进行正压冲洗,而第三组和第四组采用手用和旋转器械,使用Endo-Irrigator Plus(CWAIS)系统进行正负压冲洗。使用5.25%的次氯酸钠和17%的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)作为冲洗剂。第五组作为对照组,仅进行根管口开放。使用环境扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析根管颈段、中段和根尖段的玷污层去除情况。统计学显著性设定为<0.05。
在颈段、中段和根尖段所有组之间均观察到统计学显著差异(<0.05)。通过SEM检查发现,第三组和第四组在所有水平的玷污层评分均显著较低,尤其是在根尖段。
与正压冲洗方法相比,使用Endo-Irrigator Plus(CWAIS)系统在乳牙根管内碎屑清理方面表现出更优的效果。
Badnaware SD, Kakade A, Takate V, 乳牙根尖负压冲洗的效果:玷污层分析。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2024;17(6):653 - 657。