Suppr超能文献

一项双盲随机对照试验,比较在接受脐下手术的儿童骶管麻醉中,使用吗啡、可乐定或右美托咪定作为罗哌卡因辅助剂时的镇痛持续时间。

A double-blinded randomized control trial to compare the duration of analgesia using morphine, clonidine, or dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to ropivacaine in caudal anesthesia in children undergoing infraumbilical surgeries.

作者信息

Pallapati Aparanjit Paul, Jose Riya, Devadharshini Beulah, Gowri Mahasampath, Joselyn Anita S

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Acute Surgical Unit, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, South Australia.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jul-Sep;40(3):388-394. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_12_23. Epub 2023 Jul 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Adjuvants added to the caudal block prolong the duration of analgesia. In a developing country with economic constraints, the choice of an adjuvant will be the medication with a longer duration of analgesia, a favorable side-effect profile, and the least expensive option. We wished to study the duration of postoperative analgesia afforded by three adjuvants: morphine, clonidine, and dexmedetomidine, at doses wherein minimal or nil adverse effects would be attributed to the adjuvant. The primary objective of the current study is to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia with morphine, clonidine, or dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to 0.2% ropivacaine in a for caudal block, in children undergoing elective abdominal, urogenital, and lower limb surgeries. The secondary objectives are (a) to study the total analgesic requirement during the first 24 hours after surgery and (b) to compare the incidence of complications among the three groups.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty-three children aged 1-6 years, belonging to American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status I, II, and scheduled to undergo elective infraumbilical surgeries, were enrolled in the study. The children were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group D received a caudal block with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg, Group M received morphine 30 μg/kg, and Group C received clonidine 1.5 μg/kg. All groups also received 0.2% ropivacaine (1-1.25 ml/kg) as part of the caudal block. The duration of analgesia, total analgesic requirements during the first 24 hours after the surgery, and the incidence of complications in the three groups were monitored by a pain nurse who was blinded to the study allocation.

RESULTS

The three groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, weight, and duration of surgery. The median time taken for the first rescue analgesic in the dexmedetomidine group was 380 minutes, in the clonidine group was 360 minutes, and in the morphine group was 405 minutes. Though the morphine group had a longer duration of analgesia, it was not statistically significant ( = 0.843). The total perioperative opioids used and side effects were similar among the three groups. There were no episodes of intraoperative bradycardia noted in Groups D, M, and C. However, one patient in Group D required treatment for bradycardia in the postanesthesia care unit. In terms of intraoperative hypotension, 10 patients (43.5%) in Group D, 5 patients (27.8%) in Group C, and 5 patients (22.7%) in Group M required treatment, but this difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.299). There was no significant difference observed in the time to awakening after the anesthesia among the three groups. Postoperative nausea and vomiting were noted in five patients (21.7%) in Group D, one patient (5.6%) in Group C, and four patients (18.2%) in Group M ( = 0.382). One patient in Group M had a sedation score of 5 and required 4 hours of supplemental oxygen via face mask in the ward. Additionally, one patient in Group D reported numbness in both feet lasting 12 hours with spontaneous resolution. While a significant number of patients in all three study groups experienced urinary retention, no patient reported pruritus in the ward.

CONCLUSION

Caudal administration of morphine, dexmedetomidine, and clonidine in children undergoing infraumbilical surgery resulted in an equivalent duration of analgesia.

摘要

背景与目的

添加到骶管阻滞中的佐剂可延长镇痛时间。在一个经济受限的发展中国家,佐剂的选择将是镇痛时间更长、副作用谱良好且成本最低的药物。我们希望研究三种佐剂(吗啡、可乐定和右美托咪定)在剂量极小或无不良反应归因于佐剂的情况下提供的术后镇痛持续时间。本研究的主要目的是比较在接受择期腹部、泌尿生殖系统和下肢手术的儿童中,将吗啡、可乐定或右美托咪定作为佐剂与0.2%罗哌卡因用于骶管阻滞时的术后镇痛持续时间。次要目的是:(a)研究术后24小时内的总镇痛需求;(b)比较三组之间的并发症发生率。

材料与方法

63名年龄在1 - 6岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级或II级且计划进行择期脐下手术的儿童纳入本研究。这些儿童被随机分为三组:D组接受含1μg/kg右美托咪定的骶管阻滞,M组接受30μg/kg吗啡,C组接受1.5μg/kg可乐定。所有组还接受0.2%罗哌卡因(1 - 1.25ml/kg)作为骶管阻滞的一部分。由对研究分组不知情的疼痛护士监测三组的镇痛持续时间、术后24小时内的总镇痛需求以及并发症发生率。

结果

三组在年龄、性别、体重和手术持续时间方面具有可比性。右美托咪定组首次补救镇痛的中位时间为380分钟,可乐定组为360分钟,吗啡组为405分钟。尽管吗啡组的镇痛持续时间更长,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.843)。三组围手术期使用的阿片类药物总量及副作用相似。D组、M组和C组术中均未出现心动过缓发作。然而,D组有1例患者在麻醉后护理单元需要治疗心动过缓。在术中低血压方面,D组有10例患者(43.5%)、C组有5例患者(27.8%)、M组有5例患者(22.7%)需要治疗,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.299)。三组麻醉后苏醒时间无显著差异。D组有5例患者(21.7%)、C组有1例患者(5.6%)、M组有4例患者(18.2%)出现术后恶心呕吐(P = 0.382)。M组有1例患者镇静评分为5分,在病房需要通过面罩吸氧4小时。此外,D组有1例患者报告双脚麻木持续12小时后自行缓解。虽然所有三个研究组中有相当数量的患者出现尿潴留,但病房中没有患者报告瘙痒。

结论

在接受脐下手术的儿童中,骶管注射吗啡、右美托咪定和可乐定产生的镇痛持续时间相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e02/11463927/8a0b22958113/JOACP-40-388-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验