Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.
Department of Neurology and Clinical Research Center of Neurological Disease the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):e036393. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036393. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke, considering their diabetes history and admission hyperglycemia status.
This was a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-2 (Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events-2) randomized clinical trial that enrolled patients in China between June 2021 and May 2022. Eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke for standard intravenous thrombolysis, but ineligible for endovascular thrombectomy, were randomly assigned (1:1) to tenecteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Admission hyperglycemia was defined as plasma glucose >7.8 mmol/L. The primary efficacy and safety outcome were excellent functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours, respectively. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used for the outcomes. Of the 1382 patients included, 369 (26.7%) had a history of diabetes, and 482 (34.9%) experienced admission hyperglycemia. The primary efficacy outcome, comparing tenecteplase to alteplase, was achieved in 93 (56.7%) versus 97 (48.3%) among patients with a history of diabetes (=0.11) and 335 (64.6%) versus 300 (62.2%) among those without diabetes (=0.45), respectively. The primary efficacy outcome for tenecteplase versus alteplase was comparable among patients with and without admission hyperglycemia (57.5% versus 53.9%, = 0.44; 65.4% versus 60.4%, =0.12, respectively). No significant difference in the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours was observed between tenecteplase and alteplase, regardless of diabetes history or admission hyperglycemia.
This study demonstrated that intravenous tenecteplase exhibits similar clinical outcomes compared with alteplase, irrespective of the patient's glucose metabolism status.
URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04797013.
本研究旨在探讨替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效和安全性,同时考虑其糖尿病史和入院时高血糖状态。
这是一项在中国进行的 TRACE-2(Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events-2)随机临床试验的事后分析,该试验于 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 5 月期间招募了患者。符合标准静脉溶栓但不适合血管内取栓的急性缺血性脑卒中患者,按 1:1 比例随机分配至替奈普酶或阿替普酶治疗组,在症状出现后 4.5 小时内进行治疗。入院时高血糖定义为血浆葡萄糖>7.8mmol/L。主要疗效和安全性结局分别为 90 天(改良 Rankin 量表评分为 0-1)时的良好功能结局和 36 小时内的症状性颅内出血。采用 Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel 检验进行结局评估。在纳入的 1382 例患者中,369 例(26.7%)有糖尿病史,482 例(34.9%)入院时发生高血糖。与阿替普酶相比,替奈普酶在有糖尿病史的患者中达到主要疗效结局的比例为 93(56.7%)比 97(48.3%)(=0.11),在无糖尿病史的患者中为 335(64.6%)比 300(62.2%)(=0.45)。替奈普酶与阿替普酶相比,在有和无入院时高血糖的患者中主要疗效结局相当(36 小时内症状性颅内出血风险:57.5%比 53.9%,=0.44;65.4%比 60.4%,=0.12)。无论患者的血糖代谢状态如何,替奈普酶与阿替普酶相比,36 小时内症状性颅内出血的风险均无显著差异。
本研究表明,与阿替普酶相比,静脉注射替奈普酶具有相似的临床结局,而与患者的葡萄糖代谢状态无关。