• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于老年急性缺血性卒中患者的疗效比较:TRACE-2试验的事后分析

Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the elderly patients: a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-2 trial.

作者信息

Xiong Yunyun, Wang Liyuan, Pan Yuesong, Wang Mengxing, Schwamm Lee H, Duan Chunmiao, Campbell Bruce C V, Li Shuya, Hao Manjun, Wu Na, Cao Zhixin, Wu Shuangzhe, Li Zixiao, Wang Yongjun

机构信息

Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2025 Feb 25;10(1):112-119. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-003048.

DOI:10.1136/svn-2023-003048
PMID:38858097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11877429/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefit-risk profile of tenecteplase in the elderly patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is uncertain. We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase compared with alteplase for AIS patients aged ≥80 years.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of the Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischaemic Cerebrovascular Events-2 Trial, a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority clinical trial. Disabling AIS patients aged ≥80 years who initiated intravenous thrombolytics within 4.5 hours of symptom onset were enrolled from June 2021 to May 2022 across 53 centres in China and were randomly allocated to receive 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase or 0.9 mg/kg alteplase. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of participants with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) within 36 hours was the safety outcome.

RESULTS

Of 137 participants, mRS 0-1 at 90 days occurred in 37 (49.3%) of 75 in the tenecteplase group vs 20 (33.9%) of 59 in the alteplase group (risk ratio (RR) 1.47, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.23). sICH within 36 hours was observed in 3 (4.0%) of 76 in the tenecteplase group and two (3.3%) of 61 in the alteplase group (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.20 to 8.41).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk-benefit profile of tenecteplase thrombolysis was preserved in the elderly patients, which lends further support to intravenous 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase as an alternative to alteplase in these patients.

摘要

背景

替奈普酶用于老年急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的获益风险情况尚不确定。我们试图研究0.25mg/kg替奈普酶与阿替普酶相比,用于年龄≥80岁的AIS患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们对急性缺血性脑血管事件-2替奈普酶再灌注治疗试验进行了事后分析,这是一项随机、3期、非劣效性临床试验。2021年6月至2022年5月期间,在中国53个中心招募了年龄≥80岁、在症状发作4.5小时内开始静脉溶栓治疗的致残性AIS患者,并将其随机分配接受0.25mg/kg替奈普酶或0.9mg/kg阿替普酶治疗。主要疗效结局是90天时改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分为0-1的参与者比例。36小时内的症状性颅内出血(sICH)为安全性结局。

结果

137名参与者中,替奈普酶组75名中有37名(49.3%)在90天时mRS评分为0-1,而阿替普酶组59名中有20名(33.9%)(风险比(RR)1.47,95%CI 0.96至2.23)。替奈普酶组76名中有3名(4.0%)在36小时内发生sICH,阿替普酶组61名中有2名(3.3%)(RR 1.30,95%CI 0.20至8.41)。

结论

替奈普酶溶栓的风险效益情况在老年患者中得以保留,这进一步支持静脉注射0.25mg/kg替奈普酶可作为这些患者阿替普酶的替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f88/11877429/eb60e205575c/svn-10-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f88/11877429/5af031750a11/svn-10-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f88/11877429/eb60e205575c/svn-10-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f88/11877429/5af031750a11/svn-10-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f88/11877429/eb60e205575c/svn-10-1-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the elderly patients: a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-2 trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于老年急性缺血性卒中患者的疗效比较:TRACE-2试验的事后分析
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2025 Feb 25;10(1):112-119. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-003048.
2
Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for minor ischaemic stroke: a secondary analysis of the AcT randomised clinical trial.静脉注射替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗轻度缺血性卒中的比较:AcT随机临床试验的二次分析
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Dec 30;9(6):604-612. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-002828.
3
Outcomes associated to the time to treatment with intravenous tenecteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: subgroup analysis of the TRACE-2 randomised controlled clinical trial.急性缺血性卒中静脉注射替奈普酶治疗时间相关的结局:TRACE-2随机对照临床试验的亚组分析
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Dec 30;9(6):613-622. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-002694.
4
Intravenous alteplase versus tenecteplase in patients with acute posterior circulation strokes: A secondary analysis from the AcT randomized controlled trial.急性后循环卒中患者静脉内使用阿替普酶与替奈普酶的比较:来自 AcT 随机对照试验的二次分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Nov;33(11):107985. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107985. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
5
Tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischaemic cerebrovascular events (TRACE-2): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑血管事件的疗效对比(TRACE-2):一项3期、多中心、开放标签、随机对照、非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2023 Feb 25;401(10377):645-654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02600-9. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
6
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of phase III randomised trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效比较:III 期随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Aug 27;9(4):360-366. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-002396.
7
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute stroke within 4·5 h of onset (ATTEST-2): a randomised, parallel group, open-label trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗发病 4·5 h 内急性脑卒中的比较(ATTEST-2):一项随机、平行分组、开放标签试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Nov;23(11):1087-1096. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00377-6.
8
Tenecteplase vs Alteplase for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ORIGINAL Randomized Clinical Trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中患者:ORIGINAL随机临床试验
JAMA. 2024 Nov 5;332(17):1437-1445. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.14721.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Treating Acute Ischemic Stroke With Diabetes and Admission Hyperglycemia.静脉注射替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗伴有糖尿病和入院高血糖的急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):e036393. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036393. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
10
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for thrombolysis in patients selected by use of perfusion imaging within 4·5 h of onset of ischaemic stroke (TASTE): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于缺血性脑卒中发病 4.5 h 内采用灌注成像选择的患者溶栓治疗(TASTE):一项多中心、随机、对照、3 期非劣效性试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Aug;23(8):775-786. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00206-0. Epub 2024 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A clinical and computed tomography-based nomogram to predict the outcome in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion after endovascular mechanical thrombectomy.基于临床和计算机断层扫描的列线图预测血管内机械取栓后前循环大血管闭塞患者的预后。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Sep;42(9):973-982. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01583-7. Epub 2024 May 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage With Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Comparative Effectiveness of Routine Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CERTAIN) Collaboration.症状性颅内出血与替奈普酶和阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中:急性缺血性脑卒中常规替奈普酶与阿替普酶的比较效果(CERTAIN)协作组。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Jul 1;80(7):732-738. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1449.
2
Tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischaemic cerebrovascular events (TRACE-2): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑血管事件的疗效对比(TRACE-2):一项3期、多中心、开放标签、随机对照、非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2023 Feb 25;401(10377):645-654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02600-9. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
3
Safety and efficacy of tenecteplase in patients with wake-up stroke assessed by non-contrast CT (TWIST): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.非对比 CT 评估的觉醒型卒中患者使用替奈普酶的安全性和有效性(TWIST):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2023 Feb;22(2):117-126. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00484-7. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
4
Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in Canada (AcT): a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, registry-linked, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.加拿大急性缺血性脑卒中静脉内替奈普酶与阿替普酶比较(AcT):一项实用的、多中心、开放标签、与登记系统相关联、随机化、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 16;400(10347):161-169. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01054-6. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
5
Comparison of tenecteplase with alteplase for the early treatment of ischaemic stroke in the Melbourne Mobile Stroke Unit (TASTE-A): a phase 2, randomised, open-label trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于墨尔本移动卒中单元早期治疗缺血性卒中的比较(TASTE-A):一项2期随机开放标签试验
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Jun;21(6):520-527. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00171-5. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for the management of acute ischaemic stroke in Norway (NOR-TEST 2, part A): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, non-inferiority trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗挪威急性缺血性卒中(NOR-TEST 2,A部分):一项3期随机开放标签盲终点非劣效性试验
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Jun;21(6):511-519. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00124-7. Epub 2022 May 4.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase in Older Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Pooled Analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK Trials.替奈普酶在老年大血管闭塞患者中的安全性和有效性:EXTEND-IA TNK试验的汇总分析
Neurology. 2022 Mar 22;98(12):e1292-e1301. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013302. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
8
Tenecteplase Reperfusion therapy in Acute ischaemic Cerebrovascular Events-II (TRACE II): rationale and design.替奈普酶在急性缺血性脑血管事件中的再灌注治疗-II(TRACE II):原理与设计
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2022 Feb;7(1):71-76. doi: 10.1136/svn-2021-001074. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
9
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.欧洲卒中组织(ESO)急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Mar;6(1):I-LXII. doi: 10.1177/2396987321989865. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
10
China Stroke Statistics 2019: A Report From the National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Neurological Diseases, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, the Chinese Stroke Association, National Center for Chronic and Non-communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and Institute for Global Neuroscience and Stroke Collaborations.中国卒中报告 2019:国家医疗质量管理与控制中心神经系统疾病专家委员会,国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心,中国卒中学会,国家心血管病中心,中国疾病预防控制中心,全球神经科学与卒中协作组织联合报告。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020 Sep;5(3):211-239. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000457. Epub 2020 Aug 21.