• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效比较:III 期随机临床试验的荟萃分析。

Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of phase III randomised trials.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Aug 27;9(4):360-366. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-002396.

DOI:10.1136/svn-2023-002396
PMID:37640500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11420912/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tenecteplase (TNK) was found non-inferior to alteplase in recent clinical trials. We aimed to elucidate the efficacy and safety of TNK versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

Systematic literature search and a meta-analysis of phase III clinical trials in ischaemic stroke patients with TNK use were conducted. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome which was defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days and safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage and death at 90 days. We used random-effects model to estimate the pooled risk difference and 95% CI in R package 'Meta'. The included trials were adapted to the non-inferiority analysis with a margin of -4%.

RESULTS

Three trials enrolling 4094 patients were identified by systematic search. All trials included AIS patients within 4.5 hours time window. Meta-analysis indicated that 1089 (53.0%) of 2056 patients in the TNK arm and 1016 (50.5%) of 2012 in the alteplase arm had excellent functional outcome at 90 days (0.03 (95% CI -0.00 to 0.06); I=0%), meeting the prespecified non-inferiority threshold. And TNK thrombolysis was not correlated with increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (0.00 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.01); I=0%) or death (0.01 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.02); I=0%) at 90 days. The sensitivity analysis with the 0.25 mg/kg trials exclusively showed similar results to the main analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

TNK was non-inferior to alteplase for achieving excellent functional outcome at 90 days without increasing the safety concern in treating patients with AIS. These findings suggest that TNK can be an alternative to alteplase.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022354342.

摘要

背景

替奈普酶(TNK)在最近的临床试验中被证明不劣于阿替普酶。我们旨在阐明 TNK 与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)的疗效和安全性。

方法

系统地检索了使用 TNK 的缺血性脑卒中患者的 III 期临床试验文献,并进行了荟萃分析。主要结局为 90 天时改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-1 的优秀功能结局,安全性结局包括 90 天时症状性颅内出血和死亡。我们使用 R 包“Meta”中的随机效应模型来估计汇总风险差异和 95%置信区间。纳入的试验采用 -4%的边界进行非劣效性分析。

结果

通过系统搜索确定了三项纳入 4094 例患者的试验。所有试验均纳入了 4.5 小时时间窗内的 AIS 患者。荟萃分析表明,TNK 组 2056 例患者中有 1089 例(53.0%)和阿替普酶组 2012 例患者中有 1016 例(50.5%)在 90 天时具有优秀的功能结局(0.03(95%CI-0.00 至 0.06);I=0%),符合预设的非劣效性阈值。并且 TNK 溶栓与症状性颅内出血的风险增加无关(0.00(95%CI-0.01 至 0.01);I=0%)或 90 天时的死亡(0.01(95%CI-0.01 至 0.02);I=0%)。仅对 0.25mg/kg 试验进行的敏感性分析显示与主要分析相似的结果。

结论

TNK 在 90 天时达到优秀功能结局的效果不劣于阿替普酶,且在治疗 AIS 患者时不会增加安全性问题。这些发现表明 TNK 可以作为阿替普酶的替代药物。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022354342。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22e3/11420912/abbc3c58acfa/svn-2023-002396f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22e3/11420912/f60fd3bfe006/svn-2023-002396f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22e3/11420912/bee5bfac01b1/svn-2023-002396f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22e3/11420912/ce6fc549d433/svn-2023-002396f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22e3/11420912/2eae7074be82/svn-2023-002396f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22e3/11420912/abbc3c58acfa/svn-2023-002396f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22e3/11420912/f60fd3bfe006/svn-2023-002396f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22e3/11420912/bee5bfac01b1/svn-2023-002396f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22e3/11420912/ce6fc549d433/svn-2023-002396f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22e3/11420912/2eae7074be82/svn-2023-002396f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22e3/11420912/abbc3c58acfa/svn-2023-002396f05.jpg

相似文献

1
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of phase III randomised trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效比较:III 期随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Aug 27;9(4):360-366. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-002396.
2
Efficacy and safety outcomes of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性:9 项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Neurol Sci. 2024 Mar 15;458:122912. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.122912. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety among different doses of tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同剂量替奈普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效与安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Aug;33(8):107822. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107822. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
4
Intravenous alteplase versus tenecteplase in patients with acute posterior circulation strokes: A secondary analysis from the AcT randomized controlled trial.急性后循环卒中患者静脉内使用阿替普酶与替奈普酶的比较:来自 AcT 随机对照试验的二次分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Nov;33(11):107985. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107985. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
5
Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 Hours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗 4.5 小时内急性缺血性脑卒中的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurology. 2024 Nov 12;103(9):e209903. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209903. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
6
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for thrombolysis in patients selected by use of perfusion imaging within 4·5 h of onset of ischaemic stroke (TASTE): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于缺血性脑卒中发病 4.5 h 内采用灌注成像选择的患者溶栓治疗(TASTE):一项多中心、随机、对照、3 期非劣效性试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Aug;23(8):775-786. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00206-0. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Tenecteplase Bolus in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results of Two Open-Label, Multicenter Trials.急性缺血性脑卒中静脉注射替奈普酶推注的疗效和安全性:两项开放标签、多中心试验的结果。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2018 Oct;18(5):387-395. doi: 10.1007/s40256-018-0284-1.
8
Safety and Efficacy Comparison of Tenecteplase and Alteplase for Clinically Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes without Thrombectomy.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗疑诊大血管闭塞性脑卒中患者的安全性和有效性比较:不进行取栓治疗。
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2024;14(1):134-140. doi: 10.1159/000540750. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
9
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute stroke within 4·5 h of onset (ATTEST-2): a randomised, parallel group, open-label trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗发病 4·5 h 内急性脑卒中的比较(ATTEST-2):一项随机、平行分组、开放标签试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Nov;23(11):1087-1096. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00377-6.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Treating Acute Ischemic Stroke With Diabetes and Admission Hyperglycemia.静脉注射替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗伴有糖尿病和入院高血糖的急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):e036393. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036393. Epub 2024 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.替奈普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Brain Behav. 2025 Sep;15(9):e70791. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70791.
2
Tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.急性缺血性脑卒中患者使用替奈普酶与阿替普酶的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 8;30(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02983-9.
3
Effectiveness and Limitations of Intravenous rt-PA Therapy in Patients with Mild Cerebral Infarction.

本文引用的文献

1
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) expedited recommendation on tenecteplase for acute ischaemic stroke.欧洲卒中组织(ESO)发布了关于替奈普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中的加速推荐。
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Mar;8(1):8-54. doi: 10.1177/23969873221150022. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
2
Tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischaemic cerebrovascular events (TRACE-2): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑血管事件的疗效对比(TRACE-2):一项3期、多中心、开放标签、随机对照、非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2023 Feb 25;401(10377):645-654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02600-9. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
3
静脉注射重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗轻度脑梗死患者的有效性及局限性
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2025 Jun 1;32(6):661-669. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV22034. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Treating Acute Ischemic Stroke With Diabetes and Admission Hyperglycemia.静脉注射替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗伴有糖尿病和入院高血糖的急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):e036393. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036393. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
5
Intravenous Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke During Active Menstruation.活动性月经期间急性缺血性卒中静脉注射替奈普酶治疗
Cureus. 2024 Aug 19;16(8):e67186. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67186. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Comprehensive Review of Tenecteplase for Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.替奈普酶在急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓治疗中的全面综述。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e031692. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031692. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
7
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的比较:一项随机和非随机研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2024 May;271(5):2309-2323. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12243-1. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
Tenecteplase for acute ischaemic stroke.
替奈普酶用于急性缺血性脑卒中
Lancet. 2022 Jul 16;400(10347):138-139. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01107-2. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
4
Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in Canada (AcT): a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, registry-linked, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.加拿大急性缺血性脑卒中静脉内替奈普酶与阿替普酶比较(AcT):一项实用的、多中心、开放标签、与登记系统相关联、随机化、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 16;400(10347):161-169. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01054-6. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
5
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for the management of acute ischaemic stroke in Norway (NOR-TEST 2, part A): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, non-inferiority trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗挪威急性缺血性卒中(NOR-TEST 2,A部分):一项3期随机开放标签盲终点非劣效性试验
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Jun;21(6):511-519. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00124-7. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990—2019年全球、区域和国家的卒中负担及其风险因素:全球疾病负担研究2019的系统分析
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:2018 年急性缺血性脑卒中早期管理指南的更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
9
Noninferiority Margins in Trials of Thrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Is the Bar Being Set Too Low?急性缺血性脑卒中取栓装置试验中的非劣效性边界:设定的标准是否过低?
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):3519-3526. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026717. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
10
Evidence that Tenecteplase Is Noninferior to Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Meta-Analysis of 5 Randomized Trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中非劣效性的证据:5 项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2156-2162. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025080. Epub 2019 Jul 18.