White J Wilson, Kilduff D Patrick, Hastings Alan, Botsford Louis W
Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Coastal Oregon Marine Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Newport, Oregon, USA.
Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2024 Dec;34(8):e3043. doi: 10.1002/eap.3043. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
Globally, decision-makers are seeking management levers that can mitigate the negative effects of climate change on ecosystems that have already been transformed from their natural state by the effects of fishing. An important question is whether marine reserves can provide buffering (i.e., population-level resilience) against climate disturbances to fished populations. Here, we examine one aspect of this question, by asking whether marine reserves can reduce the variability in either overall biomass or in fishery yield, in the face of environmental variability. This could happen because greater reproduction of longer-lived, larger fish inside reserves could supplement recruitment to the fished portion of the population. We addressed this question using age-structured population models, assuming a system where some proportion of the coastline is protected in marine reserves (0%-30%), and the remainder is fished (at a range of possible harvest rates). We modeled populations with sedentary adults and dispersal via a larval pool. Since recent extreme climate events (e.g., marine heatwaves) have reduced juvenile survival for some fish species, we assumed that environmental variability affected the survival of the first age class in our model. We viewed population variability as a question of buffering, measured as the proportion of time a simulated population spent below a target reference point, with the idea that marine reserves could prevent the population from reaching low levels in the face of fishing and environmental variability. We found that fisheries with more area in marine reserves always had less variability in biomass. However, adding marine reserves only reduced variability in fisheries yield when the fished part of the population was being harvested at a rate exceeding the maximum sustainable yield. This new result on reducing variability is in line with previous findings that the "spillover" effects of marine reserve benefits to fishery yields only accrue when the fishery outside reserve boundaries is being overharvested.
在全球范围内,决策者们正在寻找管理手段,以减轻气候变化对已因捕鱼影响而从自然状态转变的生态系统的负面影响。一个重要问题是,海洋保护区是否能够为被捕捞种群提供抵御气候干扰的缓冲能力(即种群水平的恢复力)。在此,我们通过询问海洋保护区在面对环境变化时,是否能够降低总体生物量或渔业产量的变异性,来研究这个问题的一个方面。这可能是因为保护区内寿命更长、体型更大的鱼类繁殖增加,可以补充被捕捞种群部分的补充量。我们使用年龄结构种群模型来解决这个问题,假设一个系统中,海岸线的一定比例(0%-30%)受到海洋保护区的保护,其余部分则进行捕捞(在一系列可能的捕捞率下)。我们对具有定居成年个体和通过幼体库进行扩散的种群进行建模。由于近期的极端气候事件(如海洋热浪)降低了一些鱼类物种的幼体存活率,我们假设环境变化会影响模型中第一年龄组的存活率。我们将种群变异性视为一个缓冲问题,以模拟种群在低于目标参考点的时间比例来衡量,认为海洋保护区可以防止种群在面对捕捞和环境变化时达到低水平。我们发现,海洋保护区面积更大的渔业,生物量的变异性总是更小。然而,只有当被捕捞种群部分的捕捞率超过最大可持续产量时,增加海洋保护区才会降低渔业产量的变异性。这一关于降低变异性的新结果与之前的研究结果一致,即海洋保护区对渔业产量的“溢出”效应只有在保护区边界外的渔业被过度捕捞时才会产生。