• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平均偏差零化前标准差最小化对 IOL 屈光力公式性能的影响。

Impact of the Minimization of Standard Deviation Before Zeroization of the Mean Bias on the Performance of IOL Power Formulas.

机构信息

Anterior Segment and Refractive Surgery Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.

Memira Eye Center, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 1;13(10):22. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.10.22.

DOI:10.1167/tvst.13.10.22
PMID:39392436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11472891/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In cataract surgery, accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations are crucial for optimal postoperative refractive outcomes. This study explores the impact of prioritizing the reduction of the standard deviation (SD) of prediction errors before mean prediction error (PE) adjustment on IOL calculation formula precision and accuracy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 4885 eyes from 2611 patients, all implanted with the same IOL model, comparing four traditional IOL power calculation formulas: SRK/T, Holladay 1, Haigis, and Hoffer Q. We introduced new constants aiming to minimize the SD of PE (new_const) against traditionally optimized constants (classic_const), using a heteroscedastic statistical method for comparison. Validation of precision improvements used a secondary dataset of 262 eyes from 132 patients.

RESULTS

We observed significant reductions in mean absolute error (MAE) across training and test sets for Hoffer Q, Holladay, and Haigis formulas, indicating accuracy enhancements. Optimized constants significantly reduced SDs for Haigis from 0.3255 to 0.3153 and for Hoffer Q from 0.3521 to 0.3387. These optimizations also increased the proportion of eyes achieving PE within ±0.25 D. SRK/T showed improved SD from 0.3596 to 0.3585. However, Holladay 1 showed minimal change with no significant improvement. In the test dataset, significant reductions in SD were observed for Haigis and Hoffer Q.

CONCLUSIONS

Prioritizing SD minimization before adjusting mean PE significantly improves the precision of selected IOL power formulas, enhancing postoperative refractive outcomes. The effectiveness varies among formulas, underscoring the need for formula-specific adjustments.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

The study presents a novel two-step approach for optimizing IOL power calculations.

摘要

目的

在白内障手术中,准确的眼内人工晶状体(IOL)屈光力计算对于获得最佳术后屈光效果至关重要。本研究探讨了在平均预测误差(PE)调整之前,优先降低预测误差(PE)标准差(SD)对 IOL 计算公式精度和准确性的影响。

方法

我们对 2611 例 4885 只眼进行了回顾性分析,所有眼均植入同一型 IOL,比较了 4 种传统的 IOL 屈光力计算公式:SRK/T、Holladay 1、Haigis 和 Hoffer Q。我们采用异方差统计方法,引入了新的常数,目的是使 PE 的 SD 最小化(new_const),与传统优化常数(classic_const)进行比较。精度改进的验证使用了来自 132 例 262 只眼的二次数据集。

结果

我们观察到 Hoffer Q、Holladay 和 Haigis 公式在训练集和测试集中的平均绝对误差(MAE)均显著降低,表明准确性提高。优化常数显著降低了 Haigis 公式的 SD,从 0.3255 降至 0.3153,Hoffer Q 公式的 SD 从 0.3521 降至 0.3387。这些优化还增加了 PE 落在±0.25 D 内的眼数比例。SRK/T 的 SD 从 0.3596 提高到 0.3585。然而,Holladay 1 的 SD 变化最小,没有显著改善。在测试数据集,Haigis 和 Hoffer Q 的 SD 显著降低。

结论

在调整平均 PE 之前优先降低 SD,可显著提高选定 IOL 屈光力计算公式的精度,改善术后屈光效果。各公式的效果不同,强调了需要进行公式特异性调整。

翻译

无

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2a/11472891/c70fa6a67c43/tvst-13-10-22-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2a/11472891/862736fe0ea4/tvst-13-10-22-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2a/11472891/e60b6a459e8c/tvst-13-10-22-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2a/11472891/c70fa6a67c43/tvst-13-10-22-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2a/11472891/862736fe0ea4/tvst-13-10-22-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2a/11472891/e60b6a459e8c/tvst-13-10-22-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2a/11472891/c70fa6a67c43/tvst-13-10-22-f003.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of the Minimization of Standard Deviation Before Zeroization of the Mean Bias on the Performance of IOL Power Formulas.平均偏差零化前标准差最小化对 IOL 屈光力公式性能的影响。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 1;13(10):22. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.10.22.
2
Accuracy of eight intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with ciliary sulcus implantation.睫状沟植入患者中八种人工晶状体屈光度计算公式的准确性
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 26;45(1):316. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03684-2.
3
A New Method to Minimize the Standard Deviation and Root Mean Square of the Prediction Error of Single-Optimized IOL Power Formulas.一种最小化单优化人工晶状体屈光力公式预测误差标准差和均方根的新方法。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Jun 3;13(6):2. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.6.2.
4
Spherical equivalent prediction analysis in intraocular lens power calculations using Eyetemis: a comprehensive approach.基于 Eyetemis 的人工晶状体计算公式中球镜等效预测分析:一种综合方法。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Nov 1;50(11):1128-1134. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001518.
5
Accuracy of 7 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in primary angle-closure glaucoma eyes, according to axial length and anterior chamber depth.根据眼轴长度和前房深度,7种人工晶状体屈光力计算公式在原发性闭角型青光眼眼中的准确性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04238-x.
6
Comparison of 11 Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Eyes Undergoing Simultaneous Cataract Surgery and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.11种人工晶状体屈光度计算公式在同期白内障手术联合Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术患者眼中的比较
Am J Ophthalmol. 2025 Sep;277:295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.04.041. Epub 2025 May 15.
7
Impact of segmented optical axial length on the performance of intraocular lens power calculation formulas.分段眼轴长度对人工晶状体计算公式性能的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 May 1;50(5):492-497. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001397.
8
Limitations of constant optimization with disclosed intraocular lens power formulae.披露了眼内晶状体功率公式的恒定优化的局限性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Mar 1;50(3):201-208. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001337.
9
Accuracy of 7 artificial intelligence-based intraocular lens power calculation formulas in medium-long eyes: 2-center study.7种基于人工智能的人工晶状体屈光力计算公式在中长眼的准确性:双中心研究
Can J Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug;60(4):200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.01.020. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
10
Outcomes of zero power intraocular lenses: insights into the keratometric index and axial length.零屈光度人工晶状体的结果:对角膜曲率指数和眼轴长度的见解。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 May 1;51(5):388-393. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001624.

引用本文的文献

1
Studying the added effect of sum-of-segments biometry to modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for short eyes.研究节段总和生物测量法对短眼现代人工晶状体屈光度计算公式的附加作用。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 12;25(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03896-1.
2
Prediction of Seven Artificial Intelligence-Based Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Medium-Long Caucasian Eyes.七种基于人工智能的人工晶状体屈光力计算公式在白种人中长眼的预测
Life (Basel). 2025 Jan 1;15(1):45. doi: 10.3390/life15010045.

本文引用的文献

1
A New Method to Minimize the Standard Deviation and Root Mean Square of the Prediction Error of Single-Optimized IOL Power Formulas.一种最小化单优化人工晶状体屈光力公式预测误差标准差和均方根的新方法。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Jun 3;13(6):2. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.6.2.
2
Comparison of the formula accuracy for calculating multifocal intraocular lens power: a single center retrospective study in Korean patients.比较计算多焦点人工晶状体度数公式的准确性:韩国患者的单中心回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 23;14(1):4462. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54889-x.
3
Accuracy of 11 intraocular lens calculation formulas in shallow anterior chamber eyes.
在浅前房眼中的 11 种人工晶状体计算公式的准确性。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;102(5):e705-e711. doi: 10.1111/aos.16654. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
4
Impact of Single Constant Optimization on the Precision of IOL Power Calculation.单常数优化对人工晶状体屈光力计算精度的影响。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Nov 1;12(11):11. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.11.11.
5
Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas-A Systematic Review.人工晶状体屈光度计算公式——系统评价
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Dec;12(6):2881-2902. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00799-6. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
6
A Simplified Method to Minimize Systematic Bias of Single-Optimized Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas.一种最小化单优化人工晶状体计算公式系统偏差的简化方法。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;253:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 6.
7
Accuracy of 24 IOL Power Calculation Methods.24 种 IOL 计算公式的准确性。
J Refract Surg. 2023 Apr;39(4):249-256. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20230131-01. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
8
Accuracy of Nine Formulas to Calculate the Powers of an Extended Depth-of-Focus IOL Using Two SS-OCT Biometers.使用两种 SS-OCT 生物测量仪计算扩展景深人工晶状体屈光力的 9 种公式的准确性。
J Refract Surg. 2023 Mar;39(3):158-164. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20221221-03. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
9
Accuracy of new-generation intraocular lens calculation formulas in eyes with variations in predicted refraction.预测屈光存在差异的眼中新一代人工晶状体计算公式的准确性
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan;261(1):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05748-w. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
10
Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power.关于计算人工晶状体屈光力的卡斯托普公式的思考。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 2;16(6):e0252102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252102. eCollection 2021.