• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

披露了眼内晶状体功率公式的恒定优化的局限性。

Limitations of constant optimization with disclosed intraocular lens power formulae.

机构信息

From the Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany (Langenbucher, Wendelstein); Augen- und Laserklinik Castrop-Rauxel, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany (Hoffmann); School of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom (Cayless); Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria (Wendelstein); Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Center for Limbal Stem Cell and Aniridia Research, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany (Szentmáry); Department of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis-University, Budapest, Hungary (Szentmáry).

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Mar 1;50(3):201-208. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001337.

DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001337
PMID:37847110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10878441/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of formula constants on predicted refraction and limitations of constant optimization for classical and modern intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

DESIGN

Retrospective single-center consecutive case series.

METHODS

This analysis is based on a dataset of 888 eyes before and after cataract surgery with IOL implantation (Hoya Vivinex). Spherical equivalent refraction predSEQ was predicted using IOLMaster 700 data, IOL power, and formula constants from IOLCon ( https://iolcon.org ). The formula prediction error (PE) was derived as predSEQ minus achieved spherical equivalent refraction for the SRKT, Hoffer Q, Holladay, Haigis, and Castrop formulae. The gradient of predSEQ (gradSEQ) as a measure for the effect of the constants on refraction was calculated and used for constant optimization.

RESULTS

Using initial formula constants, the mean PE was -0.1782 ± 0.4450, -0.1814 ± 0.4159, -0.1702 ± 0.4207, -0.1211 ± 0.3740, and -0.1912 ± 0.3449 diopters (D) for the SRKT, Hoffer Q, Holladay, Haigis, and Castrop formulas, respectively. gradSEQ for all formula constants (except gradSEQ for the Castrop R) decay with axial length because of interaction with the effective lens position (ELP). Constant optimization for a zero mean PE (SD: 0.4410, 0.4307, 0.4272, 0.3742, 0.3436 D) results in a change in the PE trend over axial length in all formulae where the constant acts directly on the ELP.

CONCLUSIONS

With IOL power calculation formulae where the constant(s) act directly on the ELP, a change in constant(s) always changes the trend of the PE according to gradSEQ. Formulae where at least 1 constant does not act on the ELP have more flexibility to zero the mean or median PE without coupling with a PE trend error over axial length.

摘要

目的

研究公式常数对预测折射的影响,以及经典和现代人工晶状体(IOL)屈光力计算公式常数优化的局限性。

设置

三级护理中心。

设计

回顾性单中心连续病例系列。

方法

本分析基于白内障手术后植入 IOL(豪雅 Vivinex)的 888 只眼的数据集。使用 IOLMaster 700 数据、IOL 功率和 IOLCon(https://iolcon.org)中的公式常数预测预 SEQ 球镜等效折射。公式预测误差(PE)为预测的 SEQ 减去 SRKT、Hoffer Q、Holladay、Haigis 和 Castrop 公式的实际球镜等效折射。作为常数对折射影响的度量,计算了预 SEQ 的梯度(gradSEQ)并用于常数优化。

结果

使用初始公式常数,SRKT、Hoffer Q、Holladay、Haigis 和 Castrop 公式的平均 PE 分别为-0.1782±0.4450、-0.1814±0.4159、-0.1702±0.4207、-0.1211±0.3740 和-0.1912±0.3449 屈光度(D)。除 Castrop R 的 gradSEQ 外,所有公式常数的 gradSEQ 随眼轴长度衰减,因为与有效晶状体位置(ELP)相互作用。为了使平均 PE 为零(SD:0.4410、0.4307、0.4272、0.3742、0.3436 D)进行常数优化,导致所有公式中常数直接作用于 ELP 的 PE 趋势随眼轴长度而变化。

结论

对于常数直接作用于 ELP 的 IOL 屈光力计算公式,常数的变化总是根据 gradSEQ 改变 PE 的趋势。至少有一个常数不作用于 ELP 的公式具有更大的灵活性,可以将平均或中位数 PE 设为零,而不会在眼轴长度上产生 PE 趋势误差。

相似文献

1
Limitations of constant optimization with disclosed intraocular lens power formulae.披露了眼内晶状体功率公式的恒定优化的局限性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Mar 1;50(3):201-208. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001337.
2
Accuracy of eight intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with ciliary sulcus implantation.睫状沟植入患者中八种人工晶状体屈光度计算公式的准确性
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 26;45(1):316. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03684-2.
3
Spherical equivalent prediction analysis in intraocular lens power calculations using Eyetemis: a comprehensive approach.基于 Eyetemis 的人工晶状体计算公式中球镜等效预测分析:一种综合方法。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Nov 1;50(11):1128-1134. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001518.
4
Outcomes of zero power intraocular lenses: insights into the keratometric index and axial length.零屈光度人工晶状体的结果:对角膜曲率指数和眼轴长度的见解。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 May 1;51(5):388-393. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001624.
5
Accuracy of 7 artificial intelligence-based intraocular lens power calculation formulas in medium-long eyes: 2-center study.7种基于人工智能的人工晶状体屈光力计算公式在中长眼的准确性:双中心研究
Can J Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug;60(4):200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.01.020. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
6
Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in short eyes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.短眼患者的人工晶状体计算公式的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;70(3):740-748. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_934_21.
7
Considerations on the Haigis formula: Are better outcomes possible with tuning?关于海吉斯公式的思考:调整参数能否带来更好的结果?
Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug;103(5):e298-e309. doi: 10.1111/aos.17491. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
8
Accuracy of 7 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in primary angle-closure glaucoma eyes, according to axial length and anterior chamber depth.根据眼轴长度和前房深度,7种人工晶状体屈光力计算公式在原发性闭角型青光眼眼中的准确性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04238-x.
9
Comparison of Different Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Eyes With Primary Angle Closure.原发性闭角型青光眼患者不同人工晶状体计算公式的比较
J Glaucoma. 2024 Sep 1;33(9):665-670. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002430. Epub 2024 May 21.
10
Impact of segmented optical axial length on the performance of intraocular lens power calculation formulas.分段眼轴长度对人工晶状体计算公式性能的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 May 1;50(5):492-497. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001397.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting the refractive error after cataract surgery.白内障手术后影响屈光不正的因素。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 May 3;45(1):163. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03543-0.
2
Considerations on the Haigis formula: Are better outcomes possible with tuning?关于海吉斯公式的思考:调整参数能否带来更好的结果?
Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug;103(5):e298-e309. doi: 10.1111/aos.17491. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
3
IOL power calculation in long eyes: Selection of the best axial length adjustement factor using the most common formulas.长眼的人工晶状体度数计算:使用最常用公式选择最佳眼轴长度调整因子。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 23;10(17):e36609. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36609. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
4
Lens Factor Choice in IOL Power Calculation after Laser Refractive Surgery: The Right Constant for Advanced Lens Measurement Approach (ALMA).激光屈光手术后人工晶状体屈光力计算中的晶状体系数选择:适用于高级晶状体测量方法(ALMA)的正确常数
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 1;13(17):5186. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175186.
5
A New Method to Minimize the Standard Deviation and Root Mean Square of the Prediction Error of Single-Optimized IOL Power Formulas.一种最小化单优化人工晶状体屈光力公式预测误差标准差和均方根的新方法。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Jun 3;13(6):2. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.6.2.
6
Performance of a simplified strategy for formula constant optimisation in intraocular lens power calculation.简化策略在人工晶状体屈光力计算中优化公式常数的性能。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb;103(1):e10-e18. doi: 10.1111/aos.16692. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
7
Intraocular lens power calculation formulas: a scientometric analysis.人工晶状体屈光力计算公式:科学计量学分析
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec 31;12(3):115-126. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1477. eCollection 2023 Fall.