• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优先考虑患者体验:将以患者为中心的避孕咨询措施作为绩效衡量标准的验证。

Prioritizing patient experience: Validation of the person-centered contraceptive counseling measure as a performance measure.

机构信息

Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.

National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, 1025 Vermont Ave. NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20005, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2023 Jul;123:110010. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110010. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110010
PMID:36934954
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A performance measure assessing how often patients experience patient-centered contraceptive counseling can inform quality improvement in contraceptive care and enable efforts to enhance equity in the provision of this care. We sought to test the validity and reliability of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) measure as a performance measure, in preparation for application for endorsement from the National Quality Forum.

STUDY DESIGN

We combined data from two research studies, a statewide quality improvement assessment, and a dedicated data collection effort at nine sites, all collected between 2009 and 2019 at 22 total sites in the United States, to evaluate the validity and reliability of the four-item PCCC measure aggregated at the provider and facility level. We scored the PCCC dichotomously as a "top-box" score of 20 versus less than 20. We assessed reliability using the Spearman-Brown coefficient, and validity by comparing scores on the PCCC to aggregated scores on single-item measures of patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

We included 22 facilities and 34 providers in the analyses. The average PCCC top-box score by provider and facility was 81% and 79%, respectively. We found adequate reliability with panel sizes of 20-50. PCCC scores were strongly associated with the single-item measures of satisfaction. There were notable disparities by race/ethnicity and language (Spanish vs English) in PCCC scores.

DISCUSSION

The PCCC is a valid and reliable performance measure for use at the provider and facility level. The development and use of the measures of patient experience, like the PCCC, is critical for prioritizing patient-centeredness in reproductive health care.

IMPLICATIONS

The PCCC measure can facilitate the identification of gaps and disparities in patient-centered contraceptive counseling and enable quality improvement to promote quality, equitable contraceptive care. Using this measure provides the opportunity to enhance patient experience of care and build trust between contraceptive providers and the communities they serve.

摘要

目的

评估患者接受以患者为中心的避孕咨询频率的绩效指标可以为避孕护理质量改进提供信息,并有助于努力增强提供这种护理的公平性。我们旨在测试以患者为中心的避孕咨询(PCCC)作为绩效指标的有效性和可靠性,为该指标获得国家质量论坛认可做准备。

研究设计

我们结合了两项研究的数据、一项全州范围的质量改进评估以及在九个地点进行的专门数据收集工作,这些数据均于 2009 年至 2019 年在美国 22 个总共的地点收集,以评估聚合在提供者和医疗机构层面的四项 PCCC 指标的有效性和可靠性。我们将 PCCC 指标进行二分法评分,20 分或以上为“高分”,低于 20 分为“低分”。我们使用斯皮尔曼-布朗系数评估可靠性,通过将 PCCC 得分与单项患者满意度指标的得分进行比较来评估有效性。

结果

我们纳入了 22 个设施和 34 名提供者进行分析。每个提供者和医疗机构的平均 PCCC 高分率分别为 81%和 79%。我们发现,当小组规模为 20-50 时,可靠性适中。PCCC 得分与单项满意度指标密切相关。PCCC 得分在种族/民族和语言(西班牙语与英语)方面存在显著差异。

讨论

PCCC 是一种在提供者和医疗机构层面使用的有效且可靠的绩效指标。患者体验指标(如 PCCC)的开发和使用对于将以患者为中心的理念放在生殖健康护理的首位至关重要。

结论

PCCC 测量方法可有助于确定以患者为中心的避孕咨询方面的差距和差异,并能够促进质量改进,以提高优质、公平的避孕护理。使用该指标有机会改善患者的护理体验,并在避孕提供者和他们所服务的社区之间建立信任。

相似文献

1
Prioritizing patient experience: Validation of the person-centered contraceptive counseling measure as a performance measure.优先考虑患者体验:将以患者为中心的避孕咨询措施作为绩效衡量标准的验证。
Contraception. 2023 Jul;123:110010. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110010. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Development of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC), a short form of the Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale.人际关系质量计划生育关怀量表(Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale)的简短版,即以人为中心的避孕咨询量表(Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale,PCCC)的研制。
Contraception. 2021 May;103(5):310-315. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
Testing the validity and reliability of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) Performance Measure in a Real-World Contraceptive Access Program.测试真实世界避孕获取项目中以人为中心的避孕咨询(PCCC)表现测量工具的有效性和可靠性。
Contraception. 2023 Jul;123:110039. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110039. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
4
Evaluating virtual visits for contraceptive counseling: An exploratory study using the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) scale, a patient-reported outcome measure.评估避孕咨询的虚拟访问:使用以患者为中心的避孕咨询(PCCC)量表的探索性研究,这是一种患者报告的结果测量工具。
Contraception. 2024 Sep;137:110443. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110443. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
5
Women's experiences with person-centered family planning care: Differences by sociodemographic characteristics.女性以人为主导的计划生育护理体验:社会人口学特征差异
Contracept X. 2022 Jul 25;4:100081. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100081. eCollection 2022.
6
The status of person-centered contraceptive care in the United States: Results from a nationally representative sample.美国以患者为中心的避孕护理现状:基于全国代表性样本的研究结果。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Sep;55(3):129-139. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12245. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
7
Association of Title X clinic status with receipt of person-centered contraceptive counseling: A population-based study.第十条计划诊所状况与接受以人为本的避孕咨询之间的关联:一项基于人群的研究。
Contraception. 2022 Nov;115:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
8
Contraceptive counseling, method satisfaction, and planned method continuation among women in the U.S. southeast.美国东南部女性的避孕咨询、方法满意度及计划中的方法延续情况。
Contraception. 2024 Apr;132:110365. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110365. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
9
Using the person-centered contraceptive counseling (PCCC) measure for quality improvement.使用以患者为中心的避孕咨询(PCCC)措施进行质量改进。
Contraception. 2023 Jul;123:110040. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110040. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
10
Feasibility and acceptability of a toolkit-based process to implement patient-centered, immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception services.基于工具包的实施以患者为中心的即时产后长效可逆避孕服务的可行性和可接受性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar;226(3):394.e1-394.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.009. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Piloting a Birth Control Navigator Program for Adolescents and Young Adults in Indiana.在印第安纳州为青少年和青年成年人试行一项节育导航计划。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2025.07.004.
2
Effectiveness of interventions to support person-centered contraceptive care for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review.支持以患者为中心的青少年和青年成人避孕护理干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Aug;233(2):82-100.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.03.016. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
3
Differential associations between experiences of contraceptive care and subsequent contraceptive access and preferences among family planning patients by racial and ethnic identity: Evidence from Arizona, Iowa, and Wisconsin.
不同种族和民族认同的计划生育患者中,避孕护理体验与后续避孕方法获取和偏好之间的差异关联:来自亚利桑那州、爱荷华州和威斯康星州的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 11;19(10):e0312111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312111. eCollection 2024.
4
Expanding Access to Contraceptive Services in a Family Medicine Residency Clinic: The Rapid Access to Contraception Clinic Model.在家庭医学住院医师诊所扩大避孕服务的机会:快速获得避孕诊所模式。
Fam Med. 2024 Jul;56(7):442-446. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.562790.
5
Patient experiences switching from in-clinic to self-administration of injectable contraception in two Western US states.美国西部两个州的患者从诊所注射避孕转变为自行注射避孕的经历。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Dec;56(4):347-357. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12278. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
6
"So that I can trust them with my body:" How people with low incomes who may become pregnant define and prioritize quality reproductive health care.“这样我才能信任他们来照顾我的身体”:收入较低且可能怀孕的人群如何定义和优先考虑高质量的生殖保健服务。
Contraception. 2024 Oct;138:110517. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110517. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
7
Contraceptive Method Use Among a Population-Based Cohort During the South Carolina Choose Well Initiative.南卡罗来纳州“明智选择”倡议期间基于人群队列的避孕方法使用情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e248262. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8262.
8
Mobile solutions to Empower reproductive life planning for women living with HIV in Kenya (MWACh EMPOWER): Protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.肯尼亚艾滋病毒感染者女性生殖生活规划赋权的移动解决方案(MWACh EMPOWER):一项集群随机对照试验方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):e0300642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300642. eCollection 2024.
9
Estimates of use of preferred contraceptive method in the United States: a population-based study.美国首选避孕方法的使用情况估计:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Jan 19;30:100662. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100662. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Association of State Funding for Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care With Use of Contraception Among Latina Patients and Non-Latina Patients in Oregon.美国俄勒冈州的综合生殖健康护理的州政府资助与拉丁裔患者和非拉丁裔患者避孕措施使用率的相关性研究。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jul 7;4(7):e232144. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.2144.