• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Women's experiences with person-centered family planning care: Differences by sociodemographic characteristics.女性以人为主导的计划生育护理体验:社会人口学特征差异
Contracept X. 2022 Jul 25;4:100081. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100081. eCollection 2022.
2
Development of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC), a short form of the Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale.人际关系质量计划生育关怀量表(Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale)的简短版,即以人为中心的避孕咨询量表(Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale,PCCC)的研制。
Contraception. 2021 May;103(5):310-315. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
Prioritizing patient experience: Validation of the person-centered contraceptive counseling measure as a performance measure.优先考虑患者体验:将以患者为中心的避孕咨询措施作为绩效衡量标准的验证。
Contraception. 2023 Jul;123:110010. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110010. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
4
The status of person-centered contraceptive care in the United States: Results from a nationally representative sample.美国以患者为中心的避孕护理现状:基于全国代表性样本的研究结果。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Sep;55(3):129-139. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12245. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
5
Association of Title X clinic status with receipt of person-centered contraceptive counseling: A population-based study.第十条计划诊所状况与接受以人为本的避孕咨询之间的关联:一项基于人群的研究。
Contraception. 2022 Nov;115:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
6
Testing the validity and reliability of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) Performance Measure in a Real-World Contraceptive Access Program.测试真实世界避孕获取项目中以人为中心的避孕咨询(PCCC)表现测量工具的有效性和可靠性。
Contraception. 2023 Jul;123:110039. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110039. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
7
Evaluating virtual visits for contraceptive counseling: An exploratory study using the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) scale, a patient-reported outcome measure.评估避孕咨询的虚拟访问:使用以患者为中心的避孕咨询(PCCC)量表的探索性研究,这是一种患者报告的结果测量工具。
Contraception. 2024 Sep;137:110443. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110443. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
8
Religious affiliation and women's receipt of person-centered contraceptive care: Findings from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2017-2019.宗教信仰与妇女获得以人为中心的避孕护理:来自 2017-2019 年全国家庭增长调查的结果。
Contraception. 2023 Nov;127:110097. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110097. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
9
10
User-Centered Counseling and Male Involvement in Contraceptive Decision Making: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.以用户为中心的咨询与男性参与避孕决策:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Apr 5;10(4):e24884. doi: 10.2196/24884.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential associations between experiences of contraceptive care and subsequent contraceptive access and preferences among family planning patients by racial and ethnic identity: Evidence from Arizona, Iowa, and Wisconsin.不同种族和民族认同的计划生育患者中,避孕护理体验与后续避孕方法获取和偏好之间的差异关联:来自亚利桑那州、爱荷华州和威斯康星州的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 11;19(10):e0312111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312111. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploring primary care physician biases in adolescent contraceptive counseling.探索初级保健医生在青少年避孕咨询中的偏见。
Contraception. 2025 Jan;141:110706. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110706. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
3
Integrating Sexual and Reproductive Health Equity Into Public Health Goals and Metrics: Comparative Analysis of Healthy People 2030's Approach and a Person-Centered Approach to Contraceptive Access Using Population-Based Data.将性健康和生殖健康公平纳入公共卫生目标和指标:使用基于人群数据的《健康人 2030》方法与以人为主导的避孕获取方法的比较分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 20;10:e58009. doi: 10.2196/58009.
4
Estimates of use of preferred contraceptive method in the United States: a population-based study.美国首选避孕方法的使用情况估计:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Jan 19;30:100662. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100662. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Tools for patient-centred family planning counselling: A scoping review.以患者为中心的计划生育咨询工具:范围综述。
J Glob Health. 2024 Feb 2;14:04038. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04038.
6
Provider perspectives on a point-of-care tool to facilitate patient-centered contraceptive care among Latina/x patients in Baltimore, MD.医疗服务提供者对一种即时护理工具的看法,该工具旨在促进马里兰州巴尔的摩市拉丁裔/拉丁裔患者以患者为中心的避孕护理。
PEC Innov. 2023 Jul 8;3:100190. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100190. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
7
Exploring Language Used in Posts on r/birthcontrol: Case Study Using Data From Reddit Posts and Natural Language Processing to Advance Contraception Research.探索 r/birthcontrol 帖子中使用的语言:使用 Reddit 帖子数据和自然语言处理推进避孕研究的案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 30;25:e46342. doi: 10.2196/46342.
8
Primary and reproductive healthcare access and use among reproductive aged women and female family planning patients in 3 states.三个州育龄妇女和计划生育女性患者的初级和生殖保健服务获取与使用情况。
PLoS One. 2023 May 24;18(5):e0285825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285825. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Racism and the Reproductive Health Experiences of U.S.-Born Black Women.美国出生的黑人女性的种族主义和生殖健康经历。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar 1;139(3):407-416. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004675.
2
Client, provider, and visit factors associated with quality in contraceptive counseling in Mexico: an exploratory cross-sectional analysis.客户、提供者和就诊因素与墨西哥避孕咨询中的质量相关:探索性横断面分析。
Reprod Health. 2021 Dec 9;18(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01291-9.
3
Physician-Patient Communication and Satisfaction in Spanish-Language Primary Care Visits.西班牙语初级保健就诊中的医患沟通与满意度
Health Commun. 2023 Apr;38(4):714-720. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1973176. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
4
Contraceptive Care Disparities Among Sexual Orientation Identity and Racial/Ethnic Subgroups of U.S. Women: A National Probability Sample Study.美国女性的性取向认同和种族/民族亚群之间的避孕护理差距:一项全国概率样本研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Oct;30(10):1406-1415. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8992. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
5
Development of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC), a short form of the Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale.人际关系质量计划生育关怀量表(Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale)的简短版,即以人为中心的避孕咨询量表(Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale,PCCC)的研制。
Contraception. 2021 May;103(5):310-315. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
6
Discrimination and Medical Mistrust in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Sample of California Adults.加利福尼亚州不同种族和民族的成年人样本中的歧视和医疗不信任。
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;19(1):4-15. doi: 10.1370/afm.2632.
7
Association of Racial/Ethnic and Gender Concordance Between Patients and Physicians With Patient Experience Ratings.患者与医生的种族/民族和性别一致性与患者体验评分的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024583. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24583.
8
Beyond same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive access: a person-centered framework for advancing high-quality, equitable contraceptive care.超越当日长效可逆避孕措施的可及性:以患者为中心的框架,推进高质量、公平的避孕护理。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S878.e1-S878.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1279. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
9
The history of tiered-effectiveness contraceptive counseling and the importance of patient-centered family planning care.节育有效性分级咨询的历史和以患者为中心的计划生育护理的重要性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S873-S877. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1271. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
10
Quality of postpartum contraceptive counseling and changes in contraceptive method preferences.产后避孕咨询的质量与避孕方法偏好的变化
Contraception. 2019 Dec;100(6):492-497. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

女性以人为主导的计划生育护理体验:社会人口学特征差异

Women's experiences with person-centered family planning care: Differences by sociodemographic characteristics.

作者信息

Welti Kate, Manlove Jennifer, Finocharo Jane, Faccio Bianca, Kim Lisa

机构信息

Child Trends, Bethesda, MD, United States.

出版信息

Contracept X. 2022 Jul 25;4:100081. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100081. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2022.100081
PMID:35965653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9372601/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Person-centered contraceptive care is associated with positive reproductive health outcomes. Our objective was to analyze patients' ratings on the newly developed Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC) to provide distributions for a nationally representative population and to assess differences by sociodemographic characteristics.

STUDY DESIGN

Using data from 2017 to 2019 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), we analyzed ratings across the four PCCC items among 2242 women who received contraceptive counseling in the past year. Items measured patients' reports of how providers respected them, let them describe their contraceptive preferences, took their preferences seriously, and adequately informed them about their options. We studied each PCCC item individually as well as the combined scale, distinguishing between ratings of "excellent" versus lower ratings. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models assessed how patients' characteristics (age, race/ethnicity and English proficiency, sexual orientation, income, and parity) and provider type were associated with the likelihood of experiencing person-centered care.

RESULTS

The majority of women (59%-69%) reported that their family planning provider was "excellent" across the four PCCC items and just over half (51%) reported "excellent" on all items. In multivariate analyses, having a lower income, Black race, non-heterosexual identity, and Hispanic ethnicity combined with low English proficiency were associated with lower PCCC ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationally representative sample, the PCCC captured variation in women's experiences with person-centered family planning care by sociodemographic characteristics. Findings highlight the need for contraceptive counseling that centers on clients' preferences and experiences, particularly for patients who belong to groups experiencing health inequities.

IMPLICATIONS

Person-centered care is a key component of high-quality family planning services. This analysis highlights sociodemographic disparities in person-centered care by analyzing PCCC ratings. Findings show the value of this new health care performance measure and affirm the need for family planning care that centers individuals' preferences and lived experiences.

摘要

目的

以患者为中心的避孕护理与积极的生殖健康结果相关。我们的目的是分析患者对新开发的以患者为中心的避孕咨询量表(PCCC)的评分,以提供全国代表性人群的分布情况,并按社会人口学特征评估差异。

研究设计

利用2017年至2019年全国家庭成长调查(NSFG)的数据,我们分析了过去一年接受避孕咨询的2242名女性对PCCC四个项目的评分。这些项目衡量了患者关于提供者如何尊重他们、让他们描述避孕偏好、认真对待他们的偏好以及充分告知他们选择的报告。我们分别研究了每个PCCC项目以及综合量表,区分了“优秀”评分与较低评分。双变量和多变量逻辑回归模型评估了患者特征(年龄、种族/族裔和英语水平、性取向、收入和生育次数)以及提供者类型与体验以患者为中心护理的可能性之间的关联。

结果

大多数女性(59%-69%)报告称,她们的计划生育提供者在PCCC的四个项目上表现“优秀”,略超过一半(51%)的女性在所有项目上都报告“优秀”。在多变量分析中,收入较低、黑人种族、非异性恋身份以及西班牙裔族裔与低英语水平相结合,与较低的PCCC评分相关。

结论

在全国代表性样本中,PCCC通过社会人口学特征反映了女性在以患者为中心的计划生育护理方面的经历差异。研究结果凸显了以客户偏好和经历为中心的避孕咨询的必要性,特别是对于属于健康不平等群体的患者。

启示

以患者为中心的护理是高质量计划生育服务的关键组成部分。本分析通过分析PCCC评分突出了以患者为中心护理中的社会人口学差异。研究结果显示了这一新的医疗保健绩效指标的价值,并肯定了以个人偏好和生活经历为中心的计划生育护理的必要性。