Bae Sungsoo, Jo Dae-Jean, Jang Sun Woo, Park Danbi, Lee Sang Hyub, Kim Jinuk, Kim Chongman, Park Jin Hoon
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
World Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;192:e486-e493. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.007. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
To describe single-index-level fusion surgery using a cervical pedicle screw (CPS) after the complete facet resection of spinal dumbbell tumors and to compare it with partial facet resection without fusion.
We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgery for dumbbell-shaped cervical spine tumors. They were categorized into the fused group (complete facet resection with fusion using CPS) and the unfused group (partial facet resection without fusion). We compared demographics, tumor characteristics, resection rates (gross total, subtotal, or partial), and regrowth rates between the groups. Complete facet resection was performed for maximal tumor removal. In the fused group, single-index-level fusion was achieved using CPS. Despite tumor-associated erosion of the index vertebra's pedicle and/or lateral mass, the CPS was directly inserted into the vertebral body through an imaginary virtual pedicle without a lateral mass or pedicle purchase.
A total of 34 patients underwent surgery for dumbbell-shaped cervical tumors; half were classified into each group. There were no significant differences in demographic or tumor characteristics, including Asazuma classification, or histological diagnosis (P > 0.05). However, the gross total resection rate was significantly higher in the fused group (16/17, 94.1% vs. 9/17, 52.9%; P value = 0.011). Tumor recurrence was observed in 3 (17.6%) patients in the unfused group; no recurrence (0%) occurred in the fused group.
Complete facet resection with fusion using CPS significantly increased the gross total tumor removal rate, compared with partial resection without fusion. Therefore, CPS improved fusion surgery for maximal motion preservation, resulting in single-level fusion surgery.
描述在脊髓哑铃形肿瘤全关节突切除术后使用颈椎椎弓根螺钉(CPS)进行单节段融合手术,并将其与未融合的部分关节突切除进行比较。
我们回顾性分析了接受哑铃形颈椎肿瘤手术的患者。他们被分为融合组(使用CPS进行全关节突切除并融合)和未融合组(部分关节突切除未融合)。我们比较了两组患者的人口统计学特征、肿瘤特征、切除率(全切、次全切或部分切除)和复发率。为最大程度切除肿瘤进行全关节突切除。在融合组中,使用CPS实现单节段融合。尽管肿瘤导致索引椎体椎弓根和/或侧块侵蚀,但CPS通过假想的虚拟椎弓根直接插入椎体,无需侧块或椎弓根固定。
共有34例患者接受了哑铃形颈椎肿瘤手术;每组各17例。在人口统计学或肿瘤特征方面,包括浅田分类或组织学诊断,两组之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,融合组的全切率显著更高(16/17,94.1%对9/17,52.9%;P值=0.011)。未融合组有3例(17.6%)患者出现肿瘤复发;融合组未出现复发(0%)。
与未融合的部分切除相比,使用CPS进行全关节突切除并融合显著提高了肿瘤全切率。因此,CPS改善了融合手术以最大程度保留活动度,实现了单节段融合手术。