• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一线含铂和紫杉醇治疗的晚期和复发性宫颈癌患者的结局:有或无免疫检查点抑制剂适应证的比较研究。

The outcome of advanced and recurrent cervical cancer patients treated with first-line platinum and paclitaxel with or without indication for immune checkpoint inhibitors: the comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai, 054000, China.

Department of Endocrinology, Laizhou People's Hospital, Laizhou, 261400, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):1267. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12989-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-12989-x
PMID:39394089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11468096/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy activates the immune system to recognize and eliminate cancer cells that have escaped surveillance. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcome of advanced and recurrent cervical cancer patients treated with first-line platinum and paclitaxel with or without ICI.

METHODS

Data from 69 advanced and recurrent cervical cancer patients treated with first-line ICI plus platinum and paclitaxel (N = 33) or first-line platinum and paclitaxel (N = 36) were reviewed between March 2020 and January 2023 in this retrospective study. Patients chose treatment based on the actual disease condition, patient willingness, and medical advice. Additionally, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated, and adverse events were gained.

RESULTS

There was no difference in baseline data between patients receiving the two different treatments (all P > 0.05). Complete response rate (18.2% vs. 8.3%; P = 0.294), ORR (48.5% vs. 30.6%; P = 0.127), and DCR (81.8% vs. 72.2%; P = 0.345) tended to ascend in patients treated with ICI plus platinum and paclitaxel compared to those treated with platinum and paclitaxel, although there was no statistical significance. In patients treated with ICI plus platinum and paclitaxel, the median PFS was 10.3 months and the median OS was not reached. Meanwhile, the median PFS and OS were 7.7 and 16.9 months in patients treated with platinum and paclitaxel. PFS (P = 0.036) and OS (P = 0.033) were increased in patients treated with ICI plus platinum and paclitaxel versus those treated with platinum and paclitaxel, which was verified by multivariate Cox regression analyses (both P < 0.05). No difference was observed in the occurrence of adverse events between patients receiving the two different treatments (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

First-line ICI plus platinum and paclitaxel yields better treatment responses, longer survival, and non-differential adverse events versus first-line platinum and paclitaxel in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer patients.

摘要

目的

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗激活免疫系统,以识别和消除逃脱监测的癌细胞。本研究旨在比较一线铂类和紫杉醇联合或不联合 ICI 治疗晚期和复发性宫颈癌患者的治疗结果。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2020 年 3 月至 2023 年 1 月期间接受一线 ICI 联合铂类和紫杉醇(n=33)或一线铂类和紫杉醇(n=36)治疗的 69 例晚期和复发性宫颈癌患者的数据。患者根据实际病情、患者意愿和医疗建议选择治疗方案。此外,计算了客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),并获得了不良反应。

结果

两组患者的基线数据无差异(均 P>0.05)。接受 ICI 联合铂类和紫杉醇治疗的患者完全缓解率(18.2% vs. 8.3%;P=0.294)、ORR(48.5% vs. 30.6%;P=0.127)和 DCR(81.8% vs. 72.2%;P=0.345)倾向于升高,但无统计学意义。接受 ICI 联合铂类和紫杉醇治疗的患者中位 PFS 为 10.3 个月,中位 OS 未达到。而接受铂类和紫杉醇治疗的患者中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 7.7 个月和 16.9 个月。PFS(P=0.036)和 OS(P=0.033)在接受 ICI 联合铂类和紫杉醇治疗的患者中均有所改善,这在多因素 Cox 回归分析中得到验证(均 P<0.05)。接受两种不同治疗的患者不良反应的发生无差异(均 P>0.05)。

结论

一线 ICI 联合铂类和紫杉醇治疗晚期和复发性宫颈癌患者的治疗反应、生存时间优于一线铂类和紫杉醇,且不良反应无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8242/11468096/214e6330ab23/12885_2024_12989_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8242/11468096/c2d45715134e/12885_2024_12989_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8242/11468096/0cc1e758a8d0/12885_2024_12989_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8242/11468096/64208e248396/12885_2024_12989_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8242/11468096/c1c4310d1b7d/12885_2024_12989_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8242/11468096/214e6330ab23/12885_2024_12989_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8242/11468096/c2d45715134e/12885_2024_12989_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8242/11468096/0cc1e758a8d0/12885_2024_12989_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8242/11468096/64208e248396/12885_2024_12989_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8242/11468096/c1c4310d1b7d/12885_2024_12989_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8242/11468096/214e6330ab23/12885_2024_12989_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The outcome of advanced and recurrent cervical cancer patients treated with first-line platinum and paclitaxel with or without indication for immune checkpoint inhibitors: the comparative study.一线含铂和紫杉醇治疗的晚期和复发性宫颈癌患者的结局:有或无免疫检查点抑制剂适应证的比较研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):1267. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12989-x.
2
Nab-paclitaxel plus platinum versus paclitaxel plus platinum as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.奈达铂联合顺铂与紫杉醇联合顺铂作为转移性或复发性宫颈癌一线治疗的比较。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Jun 25;150(6):321. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05825-z.
3
Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.比较单药或联合免疫检查点抑制剂与含或不含贝伐珠单抗的一线含铂化疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 14;12(12):CD013257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013257.pub2.
4
Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.比较单药或联合免疫检查点抑制剂与一线含或不含贝伐珠单抗的铂类化疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 30;4(4):CD013257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013257.pub3.
5
Response to Combination Chemotherapy With Paclitaxel/Ifosfamide/Platinum Versus Paclitaxel/Platinum for Patients With Metastatic, Recurrent, or Persistent Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: A Retrospective Analysis.紫杉醇/异环磷酰胺/顺铂联合化疗与紫杉醇/顺铂治疗转移性、复发性或持续性宫颈癌患者的疗效比较:一项回顾性分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Sep;28(7):1333-1341. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001316.
6
A phase II trial of paclitaxel plus biweekly cetuximab for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer previously treated with both platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 antibody.紫杉醇联合每两周 cetuximab 治疗复发或转移性头颈部癌患者的 II 期试验,这些患者之前接受过铂类化疗和抗 PD-1 抗体治疗。
ESMO Open. 2024 Jun;9(6):103476. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103476. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
7
Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer.吉西他滨/白蛋白紫杉醇联合安罗替尼和 PD-1 抑制剂作为晚期胰腺癌一线治疗的疗效和安全性。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2024 Sep 30;139:112635. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112635. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
8
Long-term survival outcomes and immune checkpoint inhibitor retreatment in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated with camrelizumab plus apatinib in the phase II CLAP study.CLAP 研究中卡瑞利珠单抗联合阿帕替尼治疗晚期宫颈癌患者的长期生存结局和免疫检查点抑制剂的再治疗。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2024 Jun;44(6):654-669. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12547. Epub 2024 May 13.
9
The landscape of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus immunotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗与免疫治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cell Physiol. 2020 May;235(5):4913-4927. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29371. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
10
Characterization of outcomes in patients with advanced genitourinary malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.晚期泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的结局特征。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Jul;39(7):437.e1-437.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The promise of PD1/PDL1 targeted immunotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a game-changer for patients outcome?PD1/PDL1靶向免疫疗法在局部晚期宫颈癌中的前景:对患者预后来说是改变局面的因素?
Front Immunol. 2025 May 13;16:1573576. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1573576. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond Platinum, ICIs in Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review.超越铂类药物:转移性宫颈癌中免疫检查点抑制剂的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 1;14(23):5955. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235955.
2
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cervical cancer: Current status and research progress.宫颈癌中的免疫检查点抑制剂:现状与研究进展
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 27;12:984896. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.984896. eCollection 2022.
3
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced or metastatic cervical cancer: From bench to bed.用于晚期或转移性宫颈癌的PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂:从实验台到病床。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 14;12:849352. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.849352. eCollection 2022.
4
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: Results from KEYNOTE-826.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗治疗持续性、复发性或转移性宫颈癌的日本患者:KEYNOTE-826 研究结果。
Cancer Sci. 2022 Nov;113(11):3877-3887. doi: 10.1111/cas.15479. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
5
Immune checkpoint blockades in gynecological cancers: A review of clinical trials.妇科恶性肿瘤的免疫检查点抑制剂治疗:临床试验研究进展。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Sep;101(9):941-951. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14412. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
6
Camrelizumab (SHR-1210) with carboplatin and albumin-binding paclitaxel in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer: An open-label, phase 2 trial.卡瑞利珠单抗(SHR-1210)联合卡铂和白蛋白紫杉醇治疗转移性或复发性宫颈癌患者的开放标签、Ⅱ期临床试验。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2022 Apr;18(2):482-487. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1851_21.
7
Updates on systemic therapy for cervical cancer.宫颈癌系统治疗进展。
Indian J Med Res. 2021 Aug;154(2):293-302. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4454_20.
8
Overview of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Gynecological Cancer Treatment.妇科癌症治疗中免疫检查点抑制剂概述
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 27;14(3):631. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030631.
9
Combination strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: current advances and future directions.PD-1/PD-L1 阻断的联合策略:当前进展和未来方向。
Mol Cancer. 2022 Jan 21;21(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01489-2.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy for Cervical Cancer-A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.宫颈癌免疫治疗的疗效与安全性——临床试验的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 17;14(2):441. doi: 10.3390/cancers14020441.