• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络的男性健康筛查应用在 COVID-19 期间在初级保健中的试点实施研究:混合方法。

Pilot implementation study of a web-based men's health screening app in primary care during COVID-19: a mixed-methods approach.

机构信息

Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):1219. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11702-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11702-9
PMID:39394132
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11468301/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The traditional delivery of healthcare services, including crucial preventive measures such as health screenings, faced significant disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In response, eHealth technology emerged as a practical alternative for conducting screening services. This pilot study introduces ScreenMen, a web-based app for men's health screening, implemented in a primary care setting. The study aims to assess patient uptake and healthcare provider's acceptability and feasibility of implementing ScreenMen, emphasizing the importance of implementation science research in healthcare innovation.

METHODS

This study employed a mixed-method explanatory sequential design, using a tailored implementation intervention to implement ScreenMen in an urban health clinic. Quantitative phase focused on patient uptake of ScreenMen and healthcare provider involvement, utilizing Google Analytics and provider questionnaires. Qualitative phase, using in-depth interviews with providers, explored factors influencing uptake and implementation. Data analysis employed means and percentages for quantitative data and framework analysis for qualitative data.

RESULTS

We invited 47 healthcare providers to attend the ScreenMen implementation workshop, with 26 participating, resulting in a 55.3% participation rate. Throughout the five-month study, there were 75 recorded accesses, with a completion rate of 20%. The primary way users accessed the app was through QR codes on buntings (38.7%), followed by postcards (12%). In qualitative interviews with three healthcare providers, it was found that the Identify and prepare champions strategy was helpful, as these champions led the implementation and encouraged other providers to promote ScreenMen. The use of QR codes on buntings, part of the Provide education and training strategy, was effective due to their visibility in patient waiting areas. However, the Mandate change strategy was considered ineffective, as providers felt obligated rather than motivated to implement ScreenMen.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted the uptake of ScreenMen and found barriers and facilitators during the pilot implementation. Two useful strategies were Identify and prepare champions and QR codes while Mandate change was not helpful. Further studies are needed to study the effectiveness of these implementation strategies to implement web-based apps.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Number: NCT06388473 (Retrospectively registered 05/04/2024).

摘要

背景

由于 COVID-19 大流行,传统的医疗保健服务(包括健康筛查等重要预防措施)受到了严重干扰。为此,电子医疗技术成为开展筛查服务的一种实用替代方案。本试点研究介绍了 ScreenMen,这是一款用于男性健康筛查的基于网络的应用程序,在基层医疗环境中实施。该研究旨在评估患者的接受程度以及医疗服务提供者对实施 ScreenMen 的可接受性和可行性,强调在医疗保健创新中实施科学研究的重要性。

方法

本研究采用混合方法解释性序贯设计,使用定制的实施干预措施在城市健康诊所中实施 ScreenMen。定量阶段侧重于患者对 ScreenMen 的接受程度和医疗服务提供者的参与度,使用 Google Analytics 和提供者问卷进行评估。定性阶段通过对提供者进行深入访谈,探讨了影响采用和实施的因素。数据分析采用定量数据的平均值和百分比以及定性数据的框架分析。

结果

我们邀请了 47 名医疗服务提供者参加 ScreenMen 实施研讨会,其中 26 名参加,参与率为 55.3%。在整个五个月的研究期间,有 75 次记录的访问,完成率为 20%。用户访问应用程序的主要方式是通过横幅上的 QR 码(38.7%),其次是通过明信片(12%)。在对三名医疗服务提供者的定性访谈中,发现“确定和培养拥护者”策略是有效的,因为这些拥护者领导了实施过程,并鼓励其他提供者推广 ScreenMen。“提供教育和培训”策略中使用的横幅上的 QR 码也很有效,因为它们在患者等候区很显眼。然而,“强制改变”策略被认为是无效的,因为提供者感到有义务而不是有动力去实施 ScreenMen。

结论

本研究强调了 ScreenMen 的采用情况,并在试点实施过程中发现了障碍和促进因素。两个有用的策略是“确定和培养拥护者”和 QR 码,而“强制改变”策略则没有帮助。需要进一步的研究来研究这些实施策略在实施基于网络的应用程序方面的有效性。

试验注册

临床试验编号:NCT06388473(2024 年 5 月 4 日回顾性注册)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6957/11468301/0139332c6657/12913_2024_11702_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6957/11468301/ee3da3e2b12c/12913_2024_11702_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6957/11468301/0139332c6657/12913_2024_11702_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6957/11468301/ee3da3e2b12c/12913_2024_11702_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6957/11468301/0139332c6657/12913_2024_11702_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pilot implementation study of a web-based men's health screening app in primary care during COVID-19: a mixed-methods approach.基于网络的男性健康筛查应用在 COVID-19 期间在初级保健中的试点实施研究:混合方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):1219. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11702-9.
2
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.
3
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
4
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
5
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
6
Group-based interventions to reduce gambling involvement among male football fans: a synopsis of findings from a feasibility study.基于群体的干预措施以减少男性足球迷的赌博行为:一项可行性研究结果概述
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul;13(6):1-24. doi: 10.3310/SWWP9393.
7
Challenges and Mitigation Strategies in the Development and Feasibility Assessment of a Digital Mental Health Intervention for Depression (VMood): Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.抑郁症数字心理健康干预措施(VMood)开发与可行性评估中的挑战及缓解策略:混合方法可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 30;9:e68297. doi: 10.2196/68297.
8
Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.提高初级保健中戒烟率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2.
9
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.
10
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of clinical champions in facilitating the use of evidence-based practice in drug and alcohol and mental health settings: A systematic review.临床倡导者在促进药物滥用、酒精及心理健康领域循证实践应用中的作用:一项系统综述
Implement Res Pract. 2020 Oct 7;1:2633489520959072. doi: 10.1177/2633489520959072. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
eHealth literacy of patients attending a primary care clinic in Malaysia and its associated factors: A cross-sectional study.马来西亚一家初级保健诊所患者的电子健康素养及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Digit Health. 2022 Nov 17;8:20552076221135392. doi: 10.1177/20552076221135392. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
The effectiveness of champions in implementing innovations in health care: a systematic review.
倡导者在医疗保健领域实施创新中的有效性:一项系统综述。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jul 22;3(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00315-0.
4
Estimated impact of COVID-19 on preventive care service delivery: an observational cohort study.估算 COVID-19 对预防保健服务提供的影响:一项观察性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 16;21(1):1107. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07131-7.
5
Overview of Technologies Implemented During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.COVID-19 大流行第一波期间实施的技术概述:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 14;23(9):e29136. doi: 10.2196/29136.
6
Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resources.理解与应用RE-AIM框架:阐释与资源
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 May 14;5(1):e126. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.789. eCollection 2021.
7
Quick Response (QR) codes for patient information delivery: A digital innovation during the coronavirus pandemic.快速响应 (QR) 码用于传递患者信息:冠状病毒大流行期间的数字创新。
J Orthod. 2022 Mar;49(1):89-97. doi: 10.1177/14653125211031568. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
8
Implementation Strategies for Web-Based Apps for Screening: Scoping Review.基于网络的应用程序筛查实施策略:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e15591. doi: 10.2196/15591.
9
A comparison of mortality-related risk factors of COVID-19, SARS, and MERS: A systematic review and meta-analysis.新冠病毒、严重急性呼吸综合征和中东呼吸综合征病死率相关危险因素的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Infect. 2020 Oct;81(4):e18-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
10
Barriers to implementing a national health screening program for men in Malaysia: An online survey of healthcare providers.马来西亚实施全国男性健康筛查计划的障碍:医疗服务提供者的在线调查
Malays Fam Physician. 2020 Mar 18;15(1):6-14. eCollection 2020.