Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Clinical Geriatrics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Trials. 2024 Oct 12;25(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08533-8.
Meta-analyses of randomized trials suggest that health checks and health promotion interventions targeting behavior change in primary care do not prevent cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population. However, whether such interventions are more effective in high-risk populations, such as people living in low socioeconomic settings, remains unclear, as they have been poorly represented in previous trials. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation of systematic screening followed by an individually oriented, lifestyle-focused, health dialogue intervention for prevention of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, as compared to opportunistic screening, in primary care in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.
Using an overall pragmatic approach and a cluster-randomized design with two arms, we aim to enroll 3000 participants aged 50-59 years from 30 primary care centers (PCCs) with an above-average level of Care Need Index in Stockholm Region, Sweden. PCCs will be randomized (1:1) either to a health dialogue intervention, which includes inviting enlisted patients to a systematic screening of risk factors followed by an individually oriented lifestyle-focused health dialogue, or to opportunistic screening, which includes screening patients for a smaller set of risk factors during an appointment at their PCC taking place for other reasons. The main outcome will be change in systolic blood pressure during 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Additional short-term outcomes will be changes in other biological risk factors, health-related quality-of-life, and lifestyle habits, as well as process and implementation outcomes, and unintended side effects. The long-term effect on type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality will be examined using regional and nationwide registers. Changes in systolic blood pressure and other health outcomes will be analyzed using mixed-effect generalized linear modeling and mixed-effect Cox regression to capture variability between and within PCCs. A health economic evaluation will assess resource use and costs in the short- and long-term.
This trial of lifestyle-focused health dialogues and opportunistic screening in primary care in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas in the largest region of Sweden has the potential to yield valuable insights that could support evidence-based policymaking.
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06067178). Prospectively registered September 27, 2023.
随机试验的荟萃分析表明,针对初级保健中行为改变的健康检查和健康促进干预措施并不能预防普通人群的心血管发病率和死亡率。然而,在以前的试验中,这种干预措施在高风险人群(如生活在社会经济水平较低环境中的人群)中的代表性较差,因此,它们在这些人群中的效果是否更有效仍不清楚。因此,我们旨在评估在斯德哥尔摩地区社会经济处于不利地位的初级保健中,系统筛查后进行个体化、以生活方式为重点的健康对话干预与机会性筛查相比,对预防 2 型糖尿病和心血管疾病的有效性、成本效益和实施情况。
采用整体实用主义方法和两臂集群随机设计,我们计划从瑞典斯德哥尔摩地区有平均以上护理需求指数的 30 个初级保健中心(PCC)招募 3000 名年龄在 50-59 岁的参与者。PCC 将随机(1:1)分为健康对话干预组或机会性筛查组,前者包括邀请登记患者进行系统的危险因素筛查,然后进行个体化的以生活方式为重点的健康对话,后者包括在因其他原因在 PCC 就诊时筛查患者较小的一组危险因素。主要结局将是 6 个月和 12 个月随访期间收缩压的变化。其他短期结局将包括其他生物危险因素、健康相关生活质量和生活方式习惯的变化,以及过程和实施结局,以及意外的副作用。使用区域和全国登记册来检查对 2 型糖尿病和心血管疾病发病率和死亡率的长期影响。使用混合效应广义线性模型和混合效应 Cox 回归分析来分析收缩压和其他健康结果的变化,以捕捉 PCC 之间和内部的变异性。健康经济学评估将在短期和长期内评估资源利用和成本。
这项针对瑞典最大地区社会经济处于不利地位的初级保健中以生活方式为重点的健康对话和机会性筛查的试验有可能产生有价值的见解,为循证决策提供支持。
ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT06067178)。2023 年 9 月 27 日前瞻性注册。