Salvador Craig D, Keith Brian A, Ward Celine, Nguyen Shaun A, Gordis Tamar, Chidarala Shreya, Brennan Emily, Rizk Habib
Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Mar;282(3):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09001-4. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
Answer the following PICO question: Are patients diagnosed with systemic sclerosis (SSc) (Population) who are evaluated clinically and audiometrically (Intervention), have a higher prevalence of audiovestibular pathology when compared with non-SSc patients (Comparison), and how do they present symptomatically and on testing audiovestibular symptomatology and testing modalities (Outcome)?
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to November 27, 2023. Studies of patients diagnosed with SSc and audiologic and vestibular symptoms were selected for review. Studies of non-SSc pathologies, studies without audiovestibular outcomes, and case reports (fewer than four patients) were excluded. A meta-analysis of proportions and comparison of weighted proportions was performed in MedCalc 20.217.
Thirteen studies with 414 SSc patients and 390 control patients were included. The mean ± SD symptom duration was 108.5 ± 71.8 (range: 6-600) months for SSc patients. Comparison of proportions showed patients with SSc were significantly more burdened with symptoms of tinnitus (Δ34.1% [95% CI, 27.6-40.5]; p < 0.0001), vertigo (Δ32.4% [95% CI, 24.8-40.3]; p < 0.0001), and subjective hearing loss (Δ26.0% [95% CI, 20.8-31.3]; p < 0.0001) compared to control patients. Findings regarding vestibular testing were not meta-analyzable because of incomplete data and lack of standard reporting.
SSc patients showed statistically significant, yet not clinically significant, worse hearing than controls. These differences, along with increased reports of subjective audiological and vestibular symptoms in patients with SSc, emphasize interdisciplinary collaboration and assessment of SSc for audiovestibular pathologies in the appropriate clinical context.
回答以下PICO问题:与非系统性硬化症(SSc)患者相比,经临床和听力测定评估的系统性硬化症(SSc)患者(研究对象),其听觉前庭病变的患病率是否更高(干预措施),以及他们在症状表现、听觉前庭症状测试和测试方式方面情况如何(研究结果)?
进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了从数据库建立到2023年11月27日的PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆数据库。选择诊断为SSc且有听力学和前庭症状的患者的研究进行综述。排除非SSc病理学研究、无听觉前庭结果的研究以及病例报告(患者少于4例)。在MedCalc 20.217中进行了比例的荟萃分析和加权比例比较。
纳入了13项研究,其中包括414例SSc患者和390例对照患者。SSc患者的平均症状持续时间±标准差为108.5±71.8(范围:6 - 600)个月。比例比较显示,与对照患者相比,SSc患者耳鸣症状负担显著更高(差异34.1% [95%置信区间,27.6 - 40.5];p < 0.0001)、眩晕症状负担显著更高(差异32.4% [95%置信区间,24.8 - 40.3];p < 0.0001)以及主观听力损失症状负担显著更高(差异26.0% [95%置信区间,20.8 - 31.3];p < 0.0001)。由于数据不完整和缺乏标准报告格式,关于前庭测试的结果无法进行荟萃分析。
SSc患者的听力在统计学上显著差于对照组,但在临床上无显著差异。这些差异,以及SSc患者主观听力学和前庭症状报告的增加,强调了在适当的临床背景下,针对听觉前庭病变进行跨学科协作和对SSc进行评估的重要性。