Suppr超能文献

糖尿病眼病筛查的扫描共焦检眼镜检查(CONCORDIA)研究论文2

The scanning CONfoCal Ophthalmoscopy foR DIAbetic eye screening (CONCORDIA) study paper 2.

作者信息

Scanlon Peter H, Gruszka-Goh Marta, Javed Ushna, Vukic Anthony, Hapeshi Julie, Chave Steve, Galsworthy Paul, Vallance Scott, Aldington Stephen J

机构信息

Gloucestershire Retinal Research Group (GRRG), Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK.

Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2024 Dec;38(18):3547-3553. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03361-1. Epub 2024 Oct 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if the Eidon white light 60-degree field Scanning Confocal Ophthalmoscope (SCO) camera was safe to use with staged mydriasis in a Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (DESP).

METHODS

The trial participants were recruited from people with diabetes attending appointments in DESP or Virtual Eye clinics for post-Covid delayed hospital appointments. Using staged mydriasis, the SCO images were taken before the pupils were dilated and compared to two-field 45 degrees mydriatic digital photography (the reference standard). Mydriatic SCO images were only compared to the reference standard if the non-mydriatic SCO images were unassessable.

RESULTS

1050 patients were recruited, 35 individuals were withdrawn, the majority (18) due to an imaging protocol deviation leaving 1015 individuals (2029 eyes). Using staged mydriasis, the sensitivity and specificity for any retinopathy was 97.5% (95% CI: 96.4-98.4%) and 82.3% (95% CI: 79.6-84.7%) respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for referable retinopathy was 92.7% (95% CI: 89.9-94.9%) and 85.4% (95% CI: 83.6-87.2%) respectively. The total number of eyes that were unassessable with the Eidon without mydriasis was 85/2029 (4.2%), and after mydriasis was 34/2029 (1.7%) and, with the reference standard, 34/2029 (1.7% - not always the same images) were unassessable.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides promising early results of the performance of the Eidon camera using staged mydriasis in a DESP which needs further evidence from a non-Caucasian population and from cost-effectiveness analyses.

摘要

目的

确定在糖尿病眼病筛查项目(DESP)中,使用Eidon白光60度视野扫描共焦眼科显微镜(SCO)相机进行分阶段散瞳检查是否安全。

方法

试验参与者从参加DESP预约或虚拟眼科诊所的糖尿病患者中招募,这些患者因新冠疫情后延迟的医院预约而来。采用分阶段散瞳,在瞳孔扩张前拍摄SCO图像,并与双视野45度散瞳数码摄影(参考标准)进行比较。仅当非散瞳SCO图像无法评估时,才将散瞳SCO图像与参考标准进行比较。

结果

共招募了1050名患者,35人退出,大多数(18人)因成像方案偏差退出,剩余1015人(2029只眼)。采用分阶段散瞳,任何视网膜病变的敏感性和特异性分别为97.5%(95%置信区间:96.4 - 98.4%)和82.3%(95%置信区间:79.6 - 84.7%)。可转诊视网膜病变的敏感性和特异性分别为92.7%(95%置信区间:89.9 - 94.9%)和85.4%(95%置信区间:83.6 - 87.2%)。未散瞳时,Eidon无法评估的眼睛总数为85/2029(4.2%),散瞳后为34/2029(1.7%),而参考标准下无法评估的眼睛数为34/2029(1.7% - 并非总是相同图像)。

结论

本研究提供了在DESP中使用分阶段散瞳的Eidon相机性能的有前景的早期结果,这需要来自非白种人群体以及成本效益分析的进一步证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ec9/11621414/4938642011cd/41433_2024_3361_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验