Whitworth Lauran
Assistant Professor of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, Agnes Scott College, Decatur, Georgia, USA.
J Lesbian Stud. 2025;29(3):234-250. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2024.2396711. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
In her 1978 essay "Uses of the Erotic: The Erotic as Power," Audre Lorde avers, "The erotic has often been misnamed by men and used against women. It has been made into the confused, the trivial, the psychotic, the plasticized sensation. For this reason, we have often turned away from the exploration and consideration of the erotic as a source of power and information" (1984, p. 54). Part of our maligning of the erotic, according to Lorde, is our separation of the spiritual from the erotic, a holdover of enlightenment thinking that insists on parsing apart that which is thought from that which is felt and sensed. This paper examines 1970s lesbian-feminist esthetics, specifically the works of American avant-garde filmmaker Barbara Hammer (1939-2019), to delineate an environmental eros, in which more-than-human nature is a source of erotic inspiration and interspecies connection. Just as Lorde theorizes the erotic as a "reminder of [one's] capacity for feeling and joy" (1984, p. 56), environmental eros understands the erotic as expansively sensual and sensory instead of solely sexual. My close readings of Hammer's films (1974), (1976), and (1976) challenge critiques of these materials as escapist relics of an essentializing past. Instead, I use feminist and film phenomenological theory to argue that the natural environment was an actor in radical re-imaginings of subjecthood and relationality that constitute an eco-erotic ethics with clear implications for contemporary environmental politics and ecological feminisms.
奥德丽·洛德在其1978年的论文《情欲的用途:作为力量的情欲》中宣称:“情欲常常被男性错误命名并被用来对付女性。它被塑造成了混乱、琐碎、病态、虚假的感觉。因此,我们常常回避将情欲作为一种力量和信息来源进行探索和思考”(1984年,第54页)。洛德认为,我们对情欲的诋毁部分源于我们将精神与情欲分离,这是启蒙思想的遗留,启蒙思想坚持将思想与感觉和感知的东西区分开来。本文审视20世纪70年代女同性恋女权主义美学,特别是美国先锋电影制作人芭芭拉·哈默(1939 - 2019)的作品,以描绘一种环境情欲,在其中超人类的自然是情欲灵感和跨物种联系的来源。正如洛德将情欲理论化为“对[一个人]感受和快乐的能力的提醒”(1984年,第56页),环境情欲将情欲理解为广泛的感官的而非仅仅是性的。我对哈默的电影《(1974年)》《(1976年)》和《(1976年)》的仔细解读,挑战了将这些作品批评为本质化过去的逃避现实的遗物的观点。相反,我运用女权主义和电影现象学理论来论证,自然环境是主体身份和关系的激进重新想象中的一个参与者,这些重新想象构成了一种生态情欲伦理,对当代环境政治和生态女权主义有着明确的影响。