• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无人独自应对(NOLA):为支持新诊断为痴呆症的人而开发的一种诊断后干预措施的方案。

No one left to cope alone (NOLA): protocol for the development of a postdiagnostic intervention to support people newly diagnosed with dementia.

机构信息

Centre for Chronic Illness and Ageing, Institute for Lifecourse Development, School of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK

Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 11;14(10):e091241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091241.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091241
PMID:39395829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11474887/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Receiving a diagnosis of dementia is a seminal moment in many people's lives. It can be associated with anger and grief for both the person with dementia and their network. Despite this, there is no provision for emotional support to help people affected by dementia manage the impact of receiving that diagnosis. As such, a postdiagnostic intervention to help people process and adjust to a diagnosis of dementia is needed. This protocol describes the initial work to be undertaken as part of a Programme Development Grant. The aims are to synthesise evidence for existing interventions, understand the implementation context and establish an advisory board.

METHODS AND ANALYSES

Phase 1 will consist of two systematic reviews to synthesise research evidence for existing interventions in related areas. Phase 2 will consist of two qualitative research studies. Study 1 is a UK-wide qualitative survey to understand the current lived experience of receiving a diagnosis and postdiagnostic support. Study 2 is a local qualitative study in which three groups of stakeholders will be asked about the perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing a postdiagnostic intervention in Natuional Health Services (NHS). In Phase 3, an advisory group of people living with dementia, carers and other professionals will be established to provide advice and feedback and contribute to the codevelopment of the initial intervention.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Health Research Authority, 15 July 2024. All data will be held in accordance with North East London NHS regulations, who act as sponsor of this development work. We will engage with policy professionals in Study 2 (Phase 2) and through this network disseminate our findings to facilitate policy change. The use of coproduction to ensure people with dementias voices are heard throughout this work will result in impact in health and well-being.

摘要

简介

被诊断患有痴呆症是许多人生活中的一个重要时刻。这可能会让痴呆症患者及其社交网络感到愤怒和悲伤。尽管如此,目前并没有为情感支持提供服务,以帮助受痴呆症影响的人应对这一诊断的影响。因此,需要进行一项诊断后干预,以帮助人们处理和适应痴呆症的诊断。本方案描述了作为项目开发资助的一部分将进行的初步工作。目的是综合现有干预措施的证据,了解实施背景并建立咨询委员会。

方法和分析

第 1 阶段将包括两项系统评价,以综合相关领域现有干预措施的研究证据。第 2 阶段将包括两项定性研究。研究 1 是一项全英范围的定性调查,旨在了解接受诊断和诊断后支持的当前实际体验。研究 2 是一项当地的定性研究,将要求三组利益相关者了解在国民保健服务(NHS)中实施诊断后干预的感知障碍和促进因素。在第 3 阶段,将成立一个由痴呆症患者、照顾者和其他专业人员组成的咨询小组,为初始干预措施的共同制定提供建议和反馈,并做出贡献。

伦理和传播

健康研究管理局,2024 年 7 月 15 日。所有数据将按照东安格利亚 NHS 规定保存,该规定是这项开发工作的赞助商。我们将在研究 2(第 2 阶段)中与政策专业人员合作,并通过该网络传播我们的发现,以促进政策变革。使用共同制定来确保痴呆症患者的声音在整个工作过程中得到倾听,将对健康和幸福感产生影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e25/11474887/831bfc0953ae/bmjopen-14-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e25/11474887/831bfc0953ae/bmjopen-14-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e25/11474887/831bfc0953ae/bmjopen-14-10-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
No one left to cope alone (NOLA): protocol for the development of a postdiagnostic intervention to support people newly diagnosed with dementia.无人独自应对(NOLA):为支持新诊断为痴呆症的人而开发的一种诊断后干预措施的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 11;14(10):e091241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091241.
2
Types and aspects of support that young carers need and value, and barriers and enablers to access: the REBIAS-YC qualitative study.年轻照顾者需要和重视的支持类型和方面,以及获得支持的障碍和促进因素:REBIAS-YC 定性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(36):1-108. doi: 10.3310/ABAT6761.
3
Protocol for the feasibility and implementation study of a model of best practice in primary care led postdiagnostic dementia care: PriDem.原发性诊断后痴呆护理最佳实践模式的可行性和实施性研究方案:PriDem。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 18;13(8):e070868. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070868.
4
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
5
Lessons for the UK on implementation and evaluation of breastfeeding support: evidence syntheses and stakeholder engagement.英国在实施和评估母乳喂养支持方面的经验教训:证据综合和利益相关者参与。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(20):1-206. doi: 10.3310/DGTP5702.
6
An intervention to improve outcomes of falls in dementia: the DIFRID mixed-methods feasibility study.一项旨在改善痴呆症患者跌倒结局的干预措施:DIFRID 混合方法可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(59):1-208. doi: 10.3310/hta23590.
7
Social prescribing for people living with dementia (PLWD) and their carers: what works, for whom, under what circumstances and why - protocol for a complex intervention systematic review.社交处方用于痴呆症患者(PLWD)及其照顾者:一项复杂干预系统评价的方案,包括什么有效、对谁有效、在什么情况下有效以及为什么有效。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 8;14(4):e080551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080551.
8
Effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 study evaluating an intervention to support 'information work' in dementia care: an implementation study protocol.评价一种干预措施以支持痴呆症护理中“信息工作”的有效性-实施混合类型 2 研究:一项实施研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 8;10(12):e038397. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038397.
9
The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia.促进痴呆症独立性(PRIDE)干预措施的发展,以增强痴呆症患者的独立性。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Sep 10;14:1615-1630. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S214367. eCollection 2019.
10
Knowledge management in dementia care networks: a qualitative analysis of successful information and support strategies for people with dementia living at home and their family caregivers.痴呆症护理网络中的知识管理:对成功的信息和支持策略的定性分析,这些策略面向居家的痴呆症患者及其家庭照护者。
Public Health. 2016 Feb;131:40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.10.021. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update.复杂干预措施的制定和评估框架:差距分析、研讨会和咨询知情更新。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(57):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta25570.
2
"A piece of paper is not the same as having someone to talk to": accessing post-diagnostic dementia care before and since COVID-19 and associated inequalities.“一张纸和有人交谈不一样”:在 COVID-19 之前和之后获得诊断后痴呆症护理以及相关的不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 11;20(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01418-1.
3
Dementia services for people from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic and White-British communities: Does a primary care based model contribute to equality in service provision?
针对黑种人、亚裔和少数族裔以及英国白人族群的痴呆症服务:基于初级保健的模式是否有助于服务提供的公平性?
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Feb;30(2):622-630. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13167. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
4
Cognitive stimulation therapy for dementia: Provision in National Health Service settings in England, Scotland and Wales.认知刺激疗法治疗痴呆:在英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士的国民保健服务机构中的提供情况。
Dementia (London). 2021 Jul;20(5):1553-1564. doi: 10.1177/1471301220954611. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
A New Approach for Developing "Implementation Plans" for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) in Low and Middle-Income Countries: Results From the CST-International Study.一种为低收入和中等收入国家制定认知刺激疗法(CST)“实施计划”的新方法:CST国际研究结果
Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 31;8:342. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00342. eCollection 2020.
6
Is health research undertaken where the burden of disease is greatest? Observational study of geographical inequalities in recruitment to research in England 2013-2018.健康研究是否在疾病负担最大的地方进行?2013-2018 年英格兰研究招募中的地理不平等观察性研究。
BMC Med. 2020 May 18;18(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01555-4.
7
Balancing the struggle to live with dementia: a systematic meta-synthesis of coping.平衡与痴呆症共存的挣扎:应对策略的系统元分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Oct 30;19(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1306-9.
8
Mixed methods implementation research of cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) for dementia in low and middle-income countries: study protocol for Brazil, India and Tanzania (CST-International).认知刺激疗法(CST)在中低收入国家治疗痴呆的混合方法实施研究:巴西、印度和坦桑尼亚的研究方案(CST-International)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):e030933. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030933.
9
Clarity out of chaos: Use of theory in implementation research.从混沌中理清头绪:在实施研究中运用理论。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112461. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.036. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
10
Psychometric Properties and Factor Analysis of the Engagement and Independence in Dementia Questionnaire (EID-Q).痴呆症问卷(EID-Q)中参与度和独立性的心理测量特性及因素分析
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2018;46(3-4):119-127. doi: 10.1159/000488484. Epub 2018 Sep 4.