Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
The Policy Institute, King's College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 12;24(1):1224. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11707-4.
The delivery of high-quality services in chronically underfunded social or long-term care systems is a major challenge internationally. National guidelines, developed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, set out how local authorities in England and Wales should fund and provide care based on best available evidence. Theoretical and participatory approaches can usefully inform the design and evaluation of implementation strategies for guidelines. The aim of the study is to develop a Theory-of-Change for how the implementation of these guidelines is expected to lead to impacts from a local authority perspective.
As part of a comparative case study (The 'Valuing Care Guidelines' study; February 2022 to April 2024) with three local authority sites in England and Wales, we involved altogether 17 participants in two Theory-of-Change online workshops per site, each of 2 hours. Additional data gathered from the same participants as part of the overall study were used to conceptualise and enrich information from the workshops.
Participants described the Theory-of-Change map as follows: A wide range of activities (categorised in stages of 'pre-implementation', 'implementation', 'sustainment and scaling') and skills were required to implement guidelines, and achieve long-term organisational sustainability and service delivery outcomes, leading to final impacts for service users and carers. Participants described a co-creation implementation model, led by 'Implementation Support Practitioners', who utilised relational skills to achieve motivation, trust, and confidence at different organisational levels, addressing contextual barriers such as inadequate staffing, lack of resources and of organisational support systems. Consistent use of guidelines by frontline staff could only be achieved if the value of guideline implementation was promoted widely, and if consideration was given to the roles of stakeholders, such as the inspection body, local health care providers, users and carers.
Our study is the first to investigate the implementation of national social care guidelines by local authorities in England and Wales. It generates insights that can guide implementation practice as well as inform the evaluation of future implementation strategies.
在长期资金不足的社会或长期护理系统中提供高质量的服务是国际上面临的一项重大挑战。国家卫生与保健卓越研究所制定的国家指南规定了英格兰和威尔士的地方当局应如何根据最佳可用证据为护理提供资金和进行护理。理论和参与式方法可以为指南实施策略的设计和评估提供有用的信息。本研究旨在从地方当局的角度制定一个关于实施这些指南如何产生影响的变革理论。
作为一项具有三个英格兰和威尔士地方当局地点的比较案例研究(“重视护理指南”研究;2022 年 2 月至 2024 年 4 月)的一部分,我们总共邀请了 17 名参与者参加每个地点的两次为期 2 小时的变革理论在线研讨会。作为整个研究的一部分,从同一参与者那里收集的其他数据被用于概念化和丰富研讨会的信息。
参与者描述了变革理论图如下:实施指南并实现长期组织可持续性和服务提供成果,最终为服务使用者和护理人员带来影响,需要广泛的活动(分为“实施前”、“实施”、“维持和扩展”阶段)和技能。参与者描述了一个由“实施支持从业者”领导的共同创造实施模型,他们利用关系技能在不同的组织层次上实现动机、信任和信心,解决人员配备不足、资源匮乏和组织支持系统不足等背景障碍。只有在广泛宣传指南实施的价值,并考虑到监管机构、当地医疗保健提供者、使用者和护理人员等利益相关者的角色的情况下,一线工作人员才能持续使用指南。
我们的研究首次调查了英格兰和威尔士地方当局对国家社会护理指南的实施情况。它提供了可以指导实施实践的见解,并为未来实施策略的评估提供信息。