Suppr超能文献

连花清瘟胶囊与蓝芩口服液治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)轻症的临床对照研究。

Comparative clinical trial of Langenlianqiao oral liquid and Lianhuaqingwen capsule in the treatment of mild cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The first people's hospital of Changde city), No.818 of Renmin Street, Wuling District, Changde, 415000, China.

出版信息

J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Oct 12;43(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00649-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Langenlianqiao (LGLQ) oral liquid treatment and provide a reference basis for the clincal treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

DESIGN

An experimental clinical study was conducted on three groups with confirmed diagnoses of COVID-19. SITE: This study was conducted at Changde Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 253 patients were enrolled in this study.

METHODS

The patients were divided into the LGLQ treatment group (100 cases), the Lianhuaqingwen (LHQW) treatment group (100 cases) and the placebo control group (53 cases), according to the treatment each group received. The occurrence of major clinical symptoms, the duration of symptom disappearance, the number of days in hospitalisation and the duration of infection were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the placebo control group (10.0 [1.2] d, 9.4 [1.3] d), the duration of infection and hospitalisation effectively decreased in the LGLQ group (6.8 [0.6] d, 7.4 [0.8] d) and the LHQW group (6.8 [1.0] d, 7.3 [1.0] d). Furthermore, the incidence of fatigue in the LGLQ group (4.0%) was lower compared to the LHQW group (14.0%) and the placebo control group (15.1%), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.580 for LGLQ vs. LHQW, P = 0.246 for LGLQ vs. placebo). In the treatment of cough, the LGLQ group showed a significantly different effect compared to both the LHQW group (P = 0.014) and the placebo group (P = 0.016). Additionally, for dry cough specifically, LHQW was effective in reducing its incidence compared to the placebo control group (P < 0.05), while LGLQ showed no statistically significant difference from either LHQW (P = 0.39) or the placebo group (P = 0.14). However, neither the LGLQ group nor the LHQW group showed a reduction in the duration of symptom disappearance in patients with pre-existing symptoms (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the placebo control group, the LGLQ group showed an improvement in the clinical symptoms of COVID-19 and a decrease in the duration of hospitalisation and infection, which confirmed that the LGLQ treatment had the same antiviral effect as the LHQW treatment. This may provide in-depth insights for antiviral therapy research.

摘要

目的

评估榄香烯口服溶液治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的临床疗效,为临床治疗 COVID-19 提供参考依据。

设计

采用确诊的 COVID-19 患者进行三组的实验性临床研究。

地点

本研究在常德市第一人民医院进行。

对象

共纳入 253 例患者。

方法

根据治疗分组,将患者分为榄香烯治疗组(100 例)、连花清瘟治疗组(100 例)和安慰剂对照组(53 例)。比较三组主要临床症状的发生情况、症状消失时间、住院天数及感染时间。

结果

与安慰剂对照组(10.0[1.2]d、9.4[1.3]d)相比,榄香烯组(6.8[0.6]d、7.4[0.8]d)和连花清瘟组(6.8[1.0]d、7.3[1.0]d)感染时间和住院时间均有效缩短,榄香烯组的乏力发生率(4.0%)低于连花清瘟组(14.0%)和安慰剂对照组(15.1%),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.580 对 LGLQ 与 LHQW,P=0.246 对 LGLQ 与安慰剂)。在治疗咳嗽方面,榄香烯组与连花清瘟组(P=0.014)和安慰剂组(P=0.016)比较差异均有统计学意义。另外,对于干咳,连花清瘟降低其发生率与安慰剂组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而榄香烯与连花清瘟(P=0.39)和安慰剂(P=0.14)比较差异均无统计学意义。但榄香烯组和连花清瘟组对原有症状患者的症状消失时间无缩短(P>0.05)。

结论

与安慰剂对照组相比,榄香烯组患者 COVID-19 临床症状改善,住院时间及感染时间缩短,证实榄香烯治疗与连花清瘟治疗具有相同的抗病毒作用,为抗病毒治疗研究提供了更深入的思路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a698/11479534/f9756a8956b0/41043_2024_649_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验