Yu Xuan, Wu Shouyuan, Zhang Juanjuan, Hu Yue, Luo Meng, Zhao Hongmei, Song Xuping, Chen Yaolong, Wang Xiaohui
Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, China.
School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, China.
Integr Med Res. 2023 Jun;12(2):100952. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2023.100952. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
Clinical practice guidelines in Traditional Chinese Medicine (CPG-TCM) is the recommendation that aims to provide the best service to users by identifying and summarizing the rules of prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and regression of diseases based on systematic reviews of evidence and balancing the advantages and disadvantages of different interventions for clinical questions of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Over the past 30 years, the concept and methods of evidence-based medicine have had a significant impact on the development of clinical practice guidelines in Western Medicine (CPG-WM), and their standardized guideline development methods are being adapted and used in the development of CPG-TCM. However, the quality of CPG-TCM is far from CPG-WM, and the methodological system for developing CPG-TCM is not yet fully established. Therefore, this study aims to explore the methodological differences between CPG-TCM and CPG-WM and to inform the development of high-quality CPGTCM.
中医临床实践指南（CPG-TCM）是一种建议，旨在通过基于证据的系统评价，识别和总结疾病预防、诊断、治疗、康复及转归的规律，并权衡不同干预措施对中医临床问题的利弊，从而为使用者提供最佳服务。在过去30年里，循证医学的概念和方法对西医临床实践指南（CPG-WM）的发展产生了重大影响，其标准化的指南制定方法正在被应用于CPG-TCM的制定。然而，CPG-TCM的质量远不及CPG-WM，且CPG-TCM的方法学体系尚未完全建立。因此，本研究旨在探讨CPG-TCM与CPG-WM之间的方法学差异，为高质量CPG-TCM的制定提供参考。
