基于智能手机应用程序的降压干预措施:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Smartphone application-based intervention to lower blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
作者信息
Abe Makiko, Hirata Tetsuo, Morito Natsumi, Kawashima Megumi, Yoshida Sumiko, Takami Yoichi, Fujimoto Taku, Kawasoe Shin, Shibukawa Takeshi, Segawa Hiroyoshi, Yamanokuchi Toshitaka, Ishida Shintaro, Takahashi Koji, Tada Kazuhiro, Kato Yoshifumi, Sakima Atsushi, Arima Hisatomi
机构信息
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
出版信息
Hypertens Res. 2025 Feb;48(2):492-505. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01939-6. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
Nowadays, the mHealth market is flooded with smartphone applications (apps) lacking validation for blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects and BP measurement accuracy. This systematic review for Guidelines for BP control using digital technologies of the Japanese Society of Hypertension aimed to assess the validation studies of apps. We searched eligible studies in Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi, focusing on randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the effects of smartphone app-based interventions with non-digital healthcare. Random effects models of meta-analysis were employed to estimate the pooled effects of mean BP change and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Out of 7385 studies screened, 76 studies with 46,459 participants were included. The interventions were significantly associated with a reduction in office systolic and diastolic BP at six months (systolic BP, -2.76 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.94 to -1.58; diastolic BP, -1.23 mmHg, -1.80 to -0.67). Normotensives saw a significant reduction in office systolic BP at three-month (-4.44 mmHg, -6.96 to -1.92), diminishing afterward (six-month, 0.86 mmHg, -2.81 to 4.52; twelve-month, 0.86 mmHg, -2.81 to 4.52). Conversely, hypertensive participants experienced a significant reduction in office systolic BP at both three- and six-month (three-month, -7.71 mmHg, -10.63 to -4.79; six-month, -1.88 mmHg, -3.41 to -0.35), albeit with limited evidence thereafter. A larger BP reduction was observed among participants using apps with wireless transmission of BP measurements (P = 0.047 for interaction), while there was no clear difference in BP reduction according to the presence of other functions. Smartphone app-based interventions may hold the potential to improve BP levels.
如今,移动健康市场充斥着缺乏降血压效果和血压测量准确性验证的智能手机应用程序(应用)。日本高血压学会关于使用数字技术控制血压指南的这项系统评价旨在评估应用的验证研究。我们在Ovid MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和Ichushi中检索了符合条件的研究,重点关注比较基于智能手机应用的干预措施与非数字医疗保健效果的随机对照试验和观察性研究。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以估计平均血压变化的合并效应和95%置信区间(CI)。在筛选的7385项研究中,纳入了76项研究,涉及46459名参与者。干预措施与六个月时诊室收缩压和舒张压的降低显著相关(收缩压,-2.76 mmHg,95% CI:-3.94至-1.58;舒张压,-1.23 mmHg,-1.80至-0.67)。血压正常者在三个月时诊室收缩压显著降低(-4.44 mmHg,-6.96至-1.92),随后降低幅度减小(六个月时,0.86 mmHg,-2.81至4.52;十二个月时,0.86 mmHg,-2.81至4.52)。相反,高血压参与者在三个月和六个月时诊室收缩压均显著降低(三个月时,-7.71 mmHg,-10.63至-4.79;六个月时,-1.88 mmHg,-3.41至-0.35),但此后证据有限。在使用具有血压测量无线传输功能应用的参与者中观察到更大的血压降低幅度(交互作用P = 0.047),而根据其他功能的有无,血压降低幅度没有明显差异。基于智能手机应用的干预措施可能具有改善血压水平的潜力。