Harris Michelle N, Daigle Leah E, Reidy Dennis, Chafin Travis, Thomson Nick D
Criminology and Criminal Justice Program, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2024 Dec;34(6):477-493. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2355. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
People involved in the criminal justice system are at increased risk of recurring intimate partner violent (IPV) victimisation. Experience of trauma is linked to a variety of negative outcomes, including repeated experiences, so it is important to identify factors that may distinguish non-victims, single-event victims and recurring victims at an early stage as this could hold potential for intervention efforts. Research studies have identified individual-level risk factors for IPV victimisation but have not investigated psychopathy traits or sex differences.
To examine sex differences in psychopathy scores and later IPV victimisation.
Using the Pathways to Desistance study, a longitudinal study of 1354 adjudicated adolescent offenders, relationships between psychopathy checklist-youth version (PCL-YV) scores measured during the baseline wave, independent/control variables in wave 6 and self-reported IPV victimisation in wave 7 were explored using multinomial regression models.
Among justice-involved young adults (average age 19), PCL-YV scores differentiated between non-victims, single-event victims and recurring victims. Higher total scores and higher ratings on the antisocial behaviours facet of psychopathy significantly increased the relative risk of recurring victimisation by an intimate partner overall, and specifically of emotional or physical intimate partner violence. For the young women but not the young men, a higher scoring on the interpersonal manipulation facet of psychopathy specifically increased the relative risk of being a recurring victim of any intimate partner violence.
Sex-specific differences in relationships between high PVL-YV scores and recurring IPV victimisation can be used to screen for risk of repeated trauma for justice-involved young adults, which may change a trajectory of continued involvement in the criminal justice system to a trajectory of resilience and recovery.
参与刑事司法系统的人遭受亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)再次侵害的风险增加。创伤经历与包括反复经历在内的各种负面结果相关,因此,尽早识别可能区分非受害者、单次受害者和反复受害者的因素很重要,因为这可能为干预措施提供潜力。研究已经确定了IPV受害的个体层面风险因素,但尚未调查精神病态特征或性别差异。
研究精神病态得分与后期IPV受害情况中的性别差异。
利用“走向停止犯罪”研究,这是一项对1354名被判定有罪的青少年罪犯进行的纵向研究,使用多项回归模型探讨了基线阶段测量的精神病态检查表青少年版(PCL-YV)得分、第6阶段的独立/控制变量与第7阶段自我报告的IPV受害情况之间的关系。
在涉及司法系统的年轻人(平均年龄19岁)中,PCL-YV得分在非受害者、单次受害者和反复受害者之间存在差异。总分较高以及精神病态反社会行为方面的评分较高,显著增加了总体上被亲密伴侣再次侵害的相对风险,特别是情感或身体亲密伴侣暴力的风险。对于年轻女性而非年轻男性,精神病态人际操纵方面的得分较高,特别增加了成为任何亲密伴侣暴力反复受害者的相对风险。
高PCL-YV得分与反复IPV受害情况之间关系中的性别特异性差异,可用于筛查涉及司法系统的年轻人遭受反复创伤的风险,这可能将持续参与刑事司法系统的轨迹转变为恢复力和康复的轨迹。