• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同创造新生儿基因组测序同意的体验:世代研究。

Co-Creating the Experience of Consent for Newborn Genome Sequencing: The Generation Study.

机构信息

Genomics England Limited, London, UK.

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2024;27(1):210-227. doi: 10.1159/000541935. Epub 2024 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1159/000541935
PMID:39396502
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Generation Study (GS) aims to recruit 100,000 newborns in England to evaluate the utility and feasibility of using whole genome sequencing to screen for rare conditions that can be treated in early childhood; enable wider research to support further discovery in genomics and health; and explore the potential of storing an individual's genome over their lifetime. The GS incorporates complexities of consent in newborn screening, genomic medicine, and healthcare research, and there is a gap in exploring how to implement existing recommendations. Participant involvement has been shown to improve the implementation of processes and materials in healthcare. This paper describes how the GS team leveraged this through Design Research (DR) methodologies to develop the GS consent experience.

METHODS

Over a 2-year period, 9 rounds of DR were undertaken with expectant and recent parents and a chosen partner (n = 105). Each round consisted of semi-structured interviews and a range of co-design and usability testing activities.

RESULTS

DR activities highlighted areas for consideration for consent materials and processes. We describe common barriers and enablers across three stages of consent: awareness, consideration, and making an informed decision. As well as ensuring participants fully understand pros and cons of taking part, materials should consider pre-existing assumptions or misconceptions which may discourage parents from learning about the GS.

CONCLUSION

Involving parents in co-creation has broadened the perspective of what constitutes informed decision-making for newborn genome sequencing. Iterative rounds of research and design can provide tangible paths forward, supporting the successful implementation of informed decision-making.

摘要

简介

Generation Study(GS)旨在招募 10 万名英国新生儿,以评估使用全基因组测序筛查可在儿童早期治疗的罕见疾病的效用和可行性;为支持基因组学和健康领域的进一步发现提供更广泛的研究;并探索在一生中存储个体基因组的潜力。GS 包含了新生儿筛查、基因组医学和医疗保健研究中同意的复杂性,并且在探索如何实施现有建议方面存在差距。参与者的参与已被证明可以改善医疗保健中流程和材料的实施。本文描述了 GS 团队如何通过设计研究(DR)方法利用这一点来开发 GS 同意体验。

方法

在两年的时间里,与预期和最近的父母以及选定的合作伙伴(n=105)进行了 9 轮 DR。每轮包括半结构化访谈以及一系列共同设计和可用性测试活动。

结果

DR 活动突出了同意材料和流程需要考虑的领域。我们描述了同意的三个阶段(意识、考虑和做出明智的决定)中常见的障碍和促成因素。除了确保参与者充分了解参与的利弊之外,材料还应考虑可能阻止父母了解 GS 的预先存在的假设或误解。

结论

让父母参与共同创造拓宽了对新生儿基因组测序知情决策的理解。反复的研究和设计可以提供切实可行的前进道路,支持知情决策的成功实施。

相似文献

1
Co-Creating the Experience of Consent for Newborn Genome Sequencing: The Generation Study.共同创造新生儿基因组测序同意的体验:世代研究。
Public Health Genomics. 2024;27(1):210-227. doi: 10.1159/000541935. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
Evaluating parents' decisions about next-generation sequencing for their child in the NC NEXUS (North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening) study: a randomized controlled trial protocol.在北卡罗来纳州新生儿外显子测序通用筛查(NC NEXUS)研究中评估父母为其子女进行下一代测序的决策:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2018 Jun 28;19(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2686-4.
3
Parental views on informed consent for expanded newborn screening.父母对扩大新生儿筛查的知情同意的看法。
Health Expect. 2013 Sep;16(3):239-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00710.x. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
4
A Prospective Study of Parental Perceptions of Rapid Whole-Genome and -Exome Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants.一项针对重症婴儿家长对快速全基因组和外显子组测序认知的前瞻性研究。
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Nov 5;107(5):953-962. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.10.004.
5
Provision of information about newborn screening antenatally: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods project.新生儿筛查的产前信息提供:一项序贯探索性混合方法项目。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Oct;21(55):1-240. doi: 10.3310/hta21550.
6
The acceptability of blood spot screening and genome sequencing in newborn screening: a systematic review examining evidence and frameworks.新生儿筛查中血斑筛查和基因组测序的可接受性:一项审查证据和框架的系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Mar 12:1-53. doi: 10.3310/RTPQ2268.
7
Views of children and young adults about Whole Genome Sequencing in newborn screening: a qualitative study.对新生儿筛查中全基因组测序的儿童和年轻人的看法:一项定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Sep;32(9):1159-1165. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01614-x. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
8
The new genetics and informed consent: differentiating choice to preserve autonomy.新遗传学与知情同意:区分选择以维护自主性。
Bioethics. 2013 Jul;27(6):348-55. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12030. Epub 2013 May 30.
9
Parental interest in genomic sequencing of newborns: enrollment experience from the BabySeq Project.父母对新生儿基因组测序的兴趣:来自 BabySeq 项目的入组经验。
Genet Med. 2019 Mar;21(3):622-630. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0105-6. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
10
The Newborn Screening Programme Revisited: An Expert Opinion on the Challenges of Rett Syndrome.重新审视新生儿筛查计划:关于雷特综合征挑战的专家意见
Genes (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;15(12):1570. doi: 10.3390/genes15121570.

引用本文的文献

1
Should newborn genetic testing for autism be introduced?是否应该引入针对自闭症的新生儿基因检测?
J Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 3. doi: 10.1136/jme-2024-110166.