• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父母对新生儿基因组测序的兴趣:来自 BabySeq 项目的入组经验。

Parental interest in genomic sequencing of newborns: enrollment experience from the BabySeq Project.

机构信息

Division of Genetics and Genomics and The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2019 Mar;21(3):622-630. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0105-6. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-018-0105-6
PMID:30209271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6420384/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Newborn genomic sequencing (nGS) has great potential to improve pediatric care. Parental interest and concerns about genomics are relatively unexplored. Understanding why parents decline research consent for nGS may reveal implementation barriers.

METHODS

We evaluated parental interest in a randomized trial of nGS in well-baby and intensive care unit nursery settings. Interested families attended an informational enrollment session (ES) with a genetic counselor prior to consenting. Reason(s) for declining participation and sociodemographic associations were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 3860 eligible approached families, 10% attended ES, 67% of whom enrolled. Of 1760 families queried for decline reasons, 58% were uninterested in research. Among 499 families considering research, principal reasons for decline prior to ES included burdensome study logistics (48%), feeling overwhelmed postpartum (17%), and lack of interest/discomfort with genetic testing (17%). Decliners after ES more often cited concerns about privacy/insurability (41%) and uncertain/unfavorable results (23%).

CONCLUSION

Low interest in research and study logistics were major initial barriers to postpartum enrollment and are likely generic to many postpartum research efforts. Concerns over privacy and result implications were most commonly cited in decliners after ES. Understanding parental concerns around research nGS may inform future integration of nGS into newborn screening, predictive testing, and pediatric diagnostics.

摘要

目的

新生儿基因组测序(nGS)具有改善儿科护理的巨大潜力。父母对基因组学的兴趣和担忧相对较少被探索。了解父母为何拒绝参与 nGS 研究可能揭示实施障碍。

方法

我们评估了父母对新生儿在常规婴儿和重症监护室环境中进行 nGS 的随机试验的兴趣。有兴趣的家庭在同意之前,先与遗传咨询师一起参加信息登记会议(ES)。分析了拒绝参与的原因和社会人口统计学关联。

结果

在 3860 名符合条件的被访家庭中,有 10%参加了 ES,其中 67%的家庭同意参与。在被问及拒绝原因的 1760 个家庭中,58%的家庭对研究不感兴趣。在 499 个考虑研究的家庭中,拒绝参与 ES 的主要原因包括研究后勤工作繁琐(48%)、产后感到不知所措(17%),以及对遗传检测缺乏兴趣/不舒适(17%)。参加 ES 后拒绝参与的家庭更多地提到对隐私/可保性的担忧(41%)和不确定/不利的结果(23%)。

结论

对研究和研究后勤工作的低兴趣是产后登记的主要初始障碍,可能对许多产后研究工作都具有普遍性。ES 后对隐私和结果影响的担忧是最常被引用的拒绝理由。了解父母对研究 nGS 的关注可能有助于未来将 nGS 纳入新生儿筛查、预测性测试和儿科诊断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2071/6420384/de823de1c993/nihms-975765-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2071/6420384/8aaa1517745a/nihms-975765-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2071/6420384/1bc3f358e265/nihms-975765-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2071/6420384/de823de1c993/nihms-975765-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2071/6420384/8aaa1517745a/nihms-975765-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2071/6420384/1bc3f358e265/nihms-975765-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2071/6420384/de823de1c993/nihms-975765-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Parental interest in genomic sequencing of newborns: enrollment experience from the BabySeq Project.父母对新生儿基因组测序的兴趣:来自 BabySeq 项目的入组经验。
Genet Med. 2019 Mar;21(3):622-630. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0105-6. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
2
Evaluating parents' decisions about next-generation sequencing for their child in the NC NEXUS (North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening) study: a randomized controlled trial protocol.在北卡罗来纳州新生儿外显子测序通用筛查(NC NEXUS)研究中评估父母为其子女进行下一代测序的决策:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2018 Jun 28;19(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2686-4.
3
Ethical Issues in Newborn Sequencing Research: The Case Study of BabySeq.新生儿测序研究中的伦理问题:以 BabySeq 为例。
Pediatrics. 2019 Dec;144(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1031. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
Psychosocial Effect of Newborn Genomic Sequencing on Families in the BabySeq Project: A Randomized Clinical Trial.新生儿基因组测序对 BabySeq 项目家庭的心理社会影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Nov 1;175(11):1132-1141. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2829.
5
Interpretation of Genomic Sequencing Results in Healthy and Ill Newborns: Results from the BabySeq Project.健康和患病新生儿基因组测序结果解读:BabySeq 项目的结果。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan 3;104(1):76-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.016.
6
Parental Attitudes Toward Standard Newborn Screening and Newborn Genomic Sequencing: Findings From the BabySeq Study.父母对标准新生儿筛查和新生儿基因组测序的态度:来自BabySeq研究的结果。
Front Genet. 2022 Apr 27;13:867371. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.867371. eCollection 2022.
7
Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium.患者拒绝基因组测序研究的原因:CSER联盟的经验
J Genet Couns. 2018 Sep;27(5):1220-1227. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0243-7. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
8
Potential Psychosocial Risks of Sequencing Newborns.新生儿测序的潜在社会心理风险。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S24-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731F.
9
Perceived Benefits, Risks, and Utility of Newborn Genomic Sequencing in the BabySeq Project.新生儿基因组测序在 BabySeq 项目中的感知益处、风险和效用。
Pediatrics. 2019 Jan;143(Suppl 1):S6-S13. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1099C.
10
Psychosocial Factors Influencing Parental Interest in Genomic Sequencing of Newborns.影响父母对新生儿基因组测序兴趣的社会心理因素。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S30-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731G.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-consent practices in biobanks in Japan: current status and stakeholder perspectives.日本生物样本库中的重新同意做法:现状与利益相关者观点
J Community Genet. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00820-4.
2
Tension between the need for certainty and numerous uncertainties-A focus group study on various perspectives on a potential genomic newborn screening program in Germany.确定性需求与诸多不确定性之间的矛盾——一项关于德国潜在基因组新生儿筛查项目不同观点的焦点小组研究
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70004. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70004.
3
Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs.

本文引用的文献

1
Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium.患者拒绝基因组测序研究的原因:CSER联盟的经验
J Genet Couns. 2018 Sep;27(5):1220-1227. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0243-7. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
2
The NSIGHT1-randomized controlled trial: rapid whole-genome sequencing for accelerated etiologic diagnosis in critically ill infants.NSIGHT1随机对照试验:在危重症婴儿中进行快速全基因组测序以加速病因诊断
NPJ Genom Med. 2018 Feb 9;3:6. doi: 10.1038/s41525-018-0045-8. eCollection 2018.
3
The Impact of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Primary Care and Outcomes of Healthy Adult Patients: A Pilot Randomized Trial.
全球基因组新生儿筛查计划中基于数据对遗传疾病的考量。
Genet Med. 2025 Jul;27(7):101443. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2025.101443. Epub 2025 May 9.
4
Rapid Whole-Genome Sequencing in Critically Ill Infants and Children with Suspected, Undiagnosed Genetic Diseases: Evolution to a First-Tier Clinical Laboratory Test in the Era of Precision Medicine.对疑似患有未确诊遗传病的危重症婴幼儿进行快速全基因组测序:在精准医学时代向一线临床实验室检测的演变。
Children (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;12(4):429. doi: 10.3390/children12040429.
5
Black community member perceptions and ethics recommendations on epigenomic research.黑人社区成员对表观基因组研究的看法及伦理建议。
Clin Epigenetics. 2025 Feb 22;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13148-025-01840-0.
6
Frequency and reasons that parents decline genetic testing for critically ill neonates.父母拒绝为危重新生儿进行基因检测的频率及原因。
Genet Med Open. 2024 Oct 15;2:101896. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101896. eCollection 2024.
7
Perceptions of genomic newborn screening: a cross-sectional survey conducted with UK medical students.基因组新生儿筛查的认知:一项在英国医学生中开展的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 24;14(9):e089108. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089108.
8
The BabySeq Project: A clinical trial of genome sequencing in a diverse cohort of infants.婴儿测序计划:对不同种族婴儿进行基因组测序的临床试验。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Oct 3;111(10):2094-2106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
9
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Newborn Screening Program Using Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in One Maternity Hospital in Southern Belgium.比利时南部一家妇产医院使用靶向新一代测序技术进行新生儿筛查项目的可行性和可接受性
Children (Basel). 2024 Jul 30;11(8):926. doi: 10.3390/children11080926.
10
Precision medicine via the integration of phenotype-genotype information in neonatal genome project.通过新生儿基因组计划中表型-基因型信息整合实现的精准医学。
Fundam Res. 2022 Jul 21;2(6):873-884. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.07.003. eCollection 2022 Nov.
全基因组测序对健康成年患者的初级保健和结局的影响:一项先导随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jun 27;167(3):159-169. doi: 10.7326/M17-0188. Print 2017 Aug 1.
4
Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health.基因组医学与公共卫生中的新生儿测序
Pediatrics. 2017 Feb;139(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2252. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
5
A curated gene list for reporting results of newborn genomic sequencing.经筛选的基因列表,用于报告新生儿基因组测序结果。
Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):809-818. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.193. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
6
Genomic sequencing in clinical practice: applications, challenges, and opportunities.临床实践中的基因组测序:应用、挑战与机遇。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2016 Sep;18(3):299-312. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.3/jkrier.
7
A prospective evaluation of whole-exome sequencing as a first-tier molecular test in infants with suspected monogenic disorders.对全外显子组测序作为疑似单基因疾病婴儿的一线分子检测的前瞻性评估。
Genet Med. 2016 Nov;18(11):1090-1096. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.1. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Participants and Study Decliners' Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing.参与者和拒绝参加者对参与全基因组测序临床试验风险的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Feb;11(1):21-30. doi: 10.1177/1556264615624078. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
9
Psychosocial Factors Influencing Parental Interest in Genomic Sequencing of Newborns.影响父母对新生儿基因组测序兴趣的社会心理因素。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S30-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731G.
10
Potential Psychosocial Risks of Sequencing Newborns.新生儿测序的潜在社会心理风险。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S24-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731F.