Morrow Christopher B, Kamath Vidyulata, Dickerson Bradford C, Eldaief Mark, Rezaii Neguine, Wong Bonnie, McGinnis Scott, Darby Ryan, Staffaroni Adam M, Lapid Maria I, Pascual Belen, Rojas Julio C, Masdeu Joseph C, Tsapkini Kyrana, Huey Edward D, Fisher Daniel W, Pantelyat Alexander, Balaji Akshata, Sah Eric, Litvan Irene, Rascovsky Katya, Ghoshal Nupur, Domoto-Reilly Kimiko, Kornak John, Onyike Chiadi U
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA.
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 28:2024.09.26.24314180. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.26.24314180.
Cognitive and behavioral phenomena define behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), but neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) outside the core criteria are common throughout the illness. Identifying how NPS cluster in bvFTD may clarify the underlying neurobiology of bvFTD-related NPS and guide development of therapies.
Participants (N=354) with sporadic and genetic bvFTD were enrolled in the ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Consortium. Dementia stage was defined as early (CDR plus NACC FTLD ≤ 1) or advanced (CDR plus NACC FTLD ≥ 1). Baseline and annual follow-up visit data were analyzed to compare NPS across stages of bvFTD. Psychiatric states were captured using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire and Clinician Judgement of Symptoms. Polychoric cluster analysis was used to describe NPS clusters.
NPS were highly prevalent (≥ 90%) in early and late bvFTD. Four NPS clusters were identified based on magnitude of factor loadings: affective, disinhibited, compulsive, and psychosis. Neuropsychiatric symptoms fluctuated across visits. In the affective cluster, depression and anxiety showed the least visit-to-visit stability. In the disinhibited cluster, elation showed the least stability. Symptoms in the psychosis and compulsive clusters (hallucinations, delusions, obsessions/compulsions, and hyperorality) were largely stable, persisting from visit-to-visit in more than 50% of cases.
NPS in bvFTD are frequent and cluster into four discrete groups in bvFTD. These clusters may result from specific neural network disruptions that could serve as targets for future interventions. The fluctuating nature of NPS in bvFTD suggests that they are not reliable markers of disease progression or stage.
认知和行为现象界定了行为变异型额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD),但核心标准之外的神经精神症状(NPS)在疾病全程中都很常见。明确NPS在bvFTD中的聚类方式可能会阐明bvFTD相关NPS的潜在神经生物学机制,并指导治疗方法的开发。
患有散发性和遗传性bvFTD的参与者(N = 354)被纳入ARTFL LEFFTDS额颞叶痴呆纵向联盟。痴呆阶段被定义为早期(CDR加NACC FTLD≤1)或晚期(CDR加NACC FTLD≥1)。分析基线和年度随访数据以比较bvFTD各阶段的NPS。使用神经精神科问卷和临床医生症状判断来记录精神状态。采用多相聚类分析来描述NPS聚类。
NPS在bvFTD早期和晚期都非常普遍(≥90%)。根据因子载荷大小确定了四个NPS聚类:情感性、脱抑制性、强迫性和精神病性。神经精神症状在各次随访中波动。在情感性聚类中,抑郁和焦虑的随访间稳定性最低。在脱抑制性聚类中,欣快感的稳定性最低。精神病性和强迫性聚类中的症状(幻觉、妄想、强迫观念/强迫行为和口欲亢进)在很大程度上是稳定的,超过50%的病例在各次随访中持续存在。
bvFTD中的NPS很常见,并在bvFTD中聚为四个不同的组。这些聚类可能源于特定神经网络的破坏,可作为未来干预的靶点。bvFTD中NPS的波动性质表明它们不是疾病进展或阶段的可靠标志物。