Fujita Ryo, Oda Itaru, Tanaka Hiroki, Takeuchi Hirohito, Oshima Shigeki, Hasebe Hiroyuki, Ambo Hiroyuki, Endo So, Fujiya Masanori, Endo Tsutomu, Yamada Katsuhisa, Takahata Masahiko, Iwasaki Norimasa
Hokkaido Orthopedic Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):468-478. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-122. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws can be very reliable anchors if inserted precisely anterior to the vertebral body; however, their trajectory is narrow, and malpositioning of the screw is not rare, especially for surgeons who are not familiar with the CBT screw. Patient-specific template guides are a solution to this problem; however, their accuracy and usefulness in clinical settings remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of long CBT placement using a patient-specific screw-guide system.
This research involved a retrospective clinical evaluation of patients who had been enrolled prospectively. One hundred consecutive patients who underwent posterior lumbar spinal fusion using the guide system performed by three experienced spine surgeons were included. Initially, the placement of the CBT screws was mapped out in three dimensions utilizing simulation software. Prior to the surgery, a specific screw guide was designed for each vertebra. Using these guides, a total of 412 screws were placed. To assess any perforation of the pedicle and to compare the discrepancies between the intended and the actual positions of the screws, postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were utilized.
Overall, 382 screws (92.7%) were fully inside the pedicle (L2-5) and there was no incidence of neurovascular injuries. The mean depth of the screw in the vertebral body (% depth) was 60.9%±8.1% and the mean % depth deviation between planned screws and actual screw was 9.6%±7.1% in total. In all vertebrae, the mean % depth was approximately 10% smaller for the actual screws than the planned screws. The mean sagittal and transverse angular deviations between the planned screws and actual screws were 2.30±1.87° and 1.89±1.26°, respectively. Overall, deviation in the sagittal angle tended to be cranial.
We demonstrated that a patient-specific screw guide is useful for supporting precise long CBT screw insertion into the lumbar spine in a clinical setting. This patient-specific template guide could be a potential solution to accurately insert long CBT screws and reduce complications, even for surgeons who are not experienced in the CBT technique.
皮质骨轨迹(CBT)螺钉如果精确插入椎体前方,可成为非常可靠的内固定物;然而,其轨迹较窄,螺钉位置不当的情况并不少见,尤其是对于不熟悉CBT螺钉的外科医生而言。患者特异性模板导向器是解决这一问题的方法;然而,其在临床环境中的准确性和实用性仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估使用患者特异性螺钉导向系统进行长节段CBT置入的准确性。
本研究对前瞻性纳入的患者进行回顾性临床评估。纳入连续100例接受由三位经验丰富的脊柱外科医生使用导向系统进行后路腰椎融合术的患者。最初,利用模拟软件在三维空间中规划CBT螺钉的置入位置。手术前,为每个椎体设计特定的螺钉导向器。使用这些导向器共置入412枚螺钉。为评估椎弓根是否有穿孔,并比较螺钉预期位置与实际位置的差异,术后利用计算机断层扫描(CT)进行扫描。
总体而言,382枚螺钉(92.7%)完全位于椎弓根内(L2-L5),且无神经血管损伤发生。螺钉在椎体内的平均深度(%深度)为60.9%±8.1%,计划置入螺钉与实际置入螺钉之间的平均%深度偏差总计为9.6%±7.1%。在所有椎体中,实际螺钉的平均%深度比计划螺钉小约10%。计划置入螺钉与实际置入螺钉之间的矢状面和横断面平均角度偏差分别为2.30±1.87°和1.89±1.26°。总体而言,矢状面角度偏差倾向于向头侧。
我们证明,患者特异性螺钉导向器有助于在临床环境中支持将长节段CBT螺钉精确置入腰椎。这种患者特异性模板导向器可能是准确置入长节段CBT螺钉并减少并发症的潜在解决方案,即使对于不熟悉CBT技术的外科医生也是如此。