Suppr超能文献

医学教育评估的新纪元:探索背景与实施的交叉点。

The Next Era of Assessment Within Medical Education: Exploring Intersections of Context and Implementation.

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences and Director of Scholarship in the Office of Postgraduate Medical Education at the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Faculty of Education at Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Oct 9;13(1):496-506. doi: 10.5334/pme.1128. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

In competency-based medical education (CBME), which is being embraced globally, the patient-learner-educator encounter occurs in a highly complex context which contributes to a wide range of assessment outcomes. Current and historical barriers to considering context in assessment include the existing post-positivist epistemological stance that values objectivity and validity evidence over the variability introduced by context. This is most evident in standardized testing. While always critical to medical education the impact of context on assessment is becoming more pronounced as many aspects of training diversify. This diversity includes an expanding interest beyond individual trainee competence to include the interdependency and collective nature of clinical competence and the growing awareness that medical education needs to be co-produced among a wider group of stakeholders. In this Eye Opener, we wish to consider: The purpose of this Eye Opener is thus two-fold. First, we conceptualize - from a variety of viewpoints, how we might address context in assessment of competence at the level of the individual learner. Second, we present recommendations that address how to approach implementation of a more contextualized competence assessment.

摘要

在全球范围内受到推崇的基于能力的医学教育(CBME)中,医患学习者教育者的互动发生在一个高度复杂的背景下,这导致了广泛的评估结果。目前和历史上阻碍在评估中考虑背景的因素包括现有的后实证主义认识论立场,该立场重视客观性和有效性证据,而不是背景带来的可变性。这在标准化测试中最为明显。虽然对医学教育一直至关重要,但随着培训的许多方面变得更加多样化,背景对评估的影响变得更加明显。这种多样性包括超出对个体学员能力的关注,扩展到对临床能力的相互依存性和集体性的关注,以及越来越意识到医学教育需要更广泛的利益相关者群体共同产生。在这篇观点文中,我们希望考虑: 因此,这篇观点文有两个目的。首先,我们从各种角度概念化-我们如何在个体学习者层面上评估能力时解决评估中的背景问题。其次,我们提出了一些建议,探讨如何实施更具背景化的能力评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f5e/11469546/ec2d924d8ed1/pme-13-1-1128-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验