Gottlieb Lindsey B, Prakash-Asrani Radhika, Dube William, Wiley Zanthia, Licitra Giancarlo, Fridkin Scott K
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 14;45(12):1-6. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.133.
To examine the relationship between race and ethnicity and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) while accounting for inherent differences in CLABSI risk related to central venous catheter (CVC) type.
Retrospective cohort analysis.
Acute care facilities within an academic healthcare system.
Adult inpatients from January 2012 through December 2017 with CVC present for ≥2 contiguous days.
We describe variability in demographics, comorbidities, CVC type/configuration, and CLABSI rate by patient's race and ethnicity. We estimated the unadjusted risk of CLABSI for each demographic and clinical characteristic and then modelled the effect of race on time to CLABSI, adjusting for total parenteral nutrition use and CVC type. We also performed exploratory analysis replacing race and ethnicity with social vulnerability index (SVI) metrics.
32,925 patients with 57,642 CVC episodes met inclusion criteria, most of which (51,348, 89%) were among non-Hispanic White or non-Hispanic Black patients. CVC types differed between race/ethnicity groups. However, after adjusting for CVC type, configuration, and indication in an adjusted cox regression, the risk of CLABSI among non-Hispanic Black patients did not significantly differ from non-Hispanic White patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94, 1.51). The odds of having a CLABSI among the most vulnerable SVI subset compared to the less vulnerable was no different (odds ratio [OR] 0.95; 95% CI: 0.75-1.2).
We did not find a difference in CLABSI risk between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black patients when adjusting for CLABSI risk inherent in type and configuration of CVC.
在考虑与中心静脉导管(CVC)类型相关的中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)风险的固有差异的同时,研究种族和民族与CLABSI之间的关系。
回顾性队列分析。
一个学术医疗系统内的急性护理机构。
2012年1月至2017年12月期间CVC留置≥2个连续日的成年住院患者。
我们按患者的种族和民族描述人口统计学、合并症、CVC类型/配置和CLABSI发生率的变异性。我们估计了每个人口统计学和临床特征的CLABSI未调整风险,然后对种族对CLABSI发生时间的影响进行建模,同时调整全胃肠外营养的使用和CVC类型。我们还用社会脆弱性指数(SVI)指标取代种族和民族进行了探索性分析。
32925名患者发生了57642次CVC事件,符合纳入标准,其中大多数(51348次,89%)发生在非西班牙裔白人或非西班牙裔黑人患者中。种族/民族群体之间的CVC类型不同。然而,在调整CVC类型、配置和指征后的校正Cox回归中,非西班牙裔黑人患者的CLABSI风险与非西班牙裔白人患者无显著差异(校正风险比[aHR]1.19;95%置信区间[CI]:0.94,1.51)。与较不脆弱的SVI亚组相比,最脆弱的SVI亚组发生CLABSI的几率没有差异(优势比[OR]0.95;95%CI:0.75-1.2)。
在调整CVC类型和配置所固有的CLABSI风险后,我们未发现非西班牙裔白人和非西班牙裔黑人患者之间的CLABSI风险存在差异。