Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver.
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 28;67(8):1175-1181. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy277.
Despite substantial attention to the individual topics, little is known about the relationship between racial disparities and antimicrobial-resistant and/or healthcare-associated infection trends, such as for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
We analyzed Emerging Infections Program 2005-2014 surveillance data (9 US states) to determine whether reductions in invasive MRSA incidence (isolated from normally sterile body sites) affected racial disparities in rates. Case classification included hospital-onset (HO, culture >3 days after admission), healthcare-associated community onset (HACO, culture ≤3 days after admission and dialysis, hospitalization, surgery, or long-term care residence within 1 year prior), or community-associated (CA, all others). Negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate the adjusted rate ratio (aRR) of MRSA in black patients (vs in white patients) controlling for age, sex, and temporal trends.
During 2005-2014, invasive HO and HACO (but not CA) MRSA rates decreased. Despite this, blacks had higher rates for HO (aRR, 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.35-4.35), HACO (aRR, 3.84; 95% CI, 2.94-5.01), and CA (aRR, 2.78; 95% CI, 2.30-3.37) MRSA. Limiting the analysis to chronic dialysis patients reduced, but did not eliminate, the higher HACO MRSA rates among blacks (aRR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.72-1.96), even though invasive MRSA rates among dialysis patients decreased during 2005-2014. These racial differences did not change over time.
Previous reductions in healthcare-associated MRSA infections have not affected racial disparities in MRSA rates. Improved understanding of the underlying causes of these differences is needed to develop effective prevention interventions that reduce racial disparities in MRSA infections.
尽管人们对各个主题都给予了大量关注,但对于种族差异与抗菌药物耐药和/或与医疗保健相关的感染趋势(如耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌,MRSA)之间的关系,人们知之甚少。
我们分析了 2005 年至 2014 年期间的新兴感染计划监测数据(美国 9 个州),以确定侵袭性 MRSA 发病率(从正常无菌部位分离出来)的降低是否会影响发病率的种族差异。病例分类包括医院发病(HO,入院后 3 天以上培养)、医疗保健相关社区发病(HACO,入院后 3 天内培养,且在 1 年内有透析、住院、手术或长期护理居住史)或社区发病(CA,其他所有情况)。采用负二项回归模型评估黑人患者(与白人患者相比)MRSA 的调整后比率比(aRR),同时控制年龄、性别和时间趋势。
2005 年至 2014 年期间,侵袭性 HO 和 HACO(但不是 CA)MRSA 发病率有所下降。尽管如此,黑人的 HO(aRR,3.20;95%置信区间[CI],2.35-4.35)、HACO(aRR,3.84;95% CI,2.94-5.01)和 CA(aRR,2.78;95% CI,2.30-3.37)MRSA 发病率更高。将分析仅限于慢性透析患者,虽然透析患者的侵袭性 MRSA 发病率在 2005-2014 年期间有所下降,但这降低了黑人患者中较高的 HACO MRSA 发病率(aRR,1.83;95% CI,1.72-1.96),但并未消除这种发病率。这些种族差异并未随时间而改变。
以前医疗保健相关 MRSA 感染的减少并未影响 MRSA 发病率的种族差异。需要更好地了解导致这些差异的根本原因,以便制定有效的预防干预措施,减少 MRSA 感染的种族差异。