Simone Avital, Carmon Lauren, Rao Priya, Cichocki Meghan, Yuan Karen, Blecha Matthew, Bechara Carlos F, Soult Michael C
Department of Surgery Loyola University Medical Center, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine and Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Maywood, IL, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2025 Apr;59(3):271-276. doi: 10.1177/15385744241292109. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
Endovascular infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has proven to be an effective, less invasive alternative to open aortic aneurysm repair with decreased 30-day mortality. Historically, urinary drainage catheters were routinely placed preoperatively before EVAR in our institution. A shift to reduced catheter placement has occurred in conjunction with percutaneous EVARs becoming more routine. Urethral catheterization carries risk of infection (UTI), urinary retention and prostatic trauma inducing hematuria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether avoidance of urinary catheter placement during EVAR is an effective practice to reduce cost and morbidity.
This was a single-institution, retrospective review of 177 consecutive patients who underwent elective infrarenal EVAR. Ruptured aneurysms and emergent EVAR were excluded. The study end points were postoperative UTI, urinary retention, length of stay, and readmission within 30 days. Univariable analysis was performed for these four outcomes in patients with (N = 92 and without (N = 65) preoperative urinary catheter placement. A more expansive multivariable investigation for risk of urinary retention following EVAR was conducted with binary logistic regression with co-variates including age, sex, femoral cutdown, estimated blood loss (EBL), urinary catheter, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and postoperative urinary retention as co-variates.
Patients who had a Urinary catheter placed had an over two fold higher event rate of urinary retention (10.9% vs 4.6%) This urinary retention trend lacked power to reach significance (OR 2.52 (.665-9.55). Placement of urinary catheter also had a strong trend towards increased rate of UTI but lacking power for significance (7.6% vs 3.10%, OR 1.96 (.556-6.57). There was no difference with or without urinary catheter placement regarding 30-day readmission (yes catheter 7.6% vs no catheter 6.2%, = .725), or length of stay (yes catheter 2.13 days vs no catheter 1.74 days, = .723). Urinary retention was significantly associated with the development of a UTI with 23% of patients who had retention developing UTI compared with 4.2% of patients without retention developing UTI (adjusted odds ratio = 17.98, = .019). Increased blood loss ( = .027) was also associated with increased rate of UTI on multivariable analysis.
Avoidance of preoperative urinary catheter placement displays a trend towards avoiding urinary retention and UTI. Patients who develop post EVAR urinary retention experience a significantly increased rate of UTI. Selective urinary catheter placement should be used to help reduce urinary-related complications following elective EVAR.
