• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于多种机器学习算法和常规血液检测的 COVID-19 早期风险评估系统的开发:一项真实世界研究。

Development of a COVID-19 early risk assessment system based on multiple machine learning algorithms and routine blood tests: a real-world study.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2024 Sep 30;15:1430899. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1430899. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1430899
PMID:39403385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11471604/
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, the massive spread of the disease has placed an enormous burden on the world's healthcare and economy. The early risk assessment system based on a variety of machine learning (ML) algorithms may be able to provide more accurate advice on the classification of COVID-19 patients, offering predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM) solutions in the future.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we divided a portion of the data into training and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio and established a model based on a combination of two ML algorithms first. Then, we used another portion of the data as an independent testing cohort to determine the most accurate and stable model and compared it with other scoring systems. Finally, patients were categorized according to risk scores and then the correlation between their clinical data and risk scores was studied.

RESULTS

The elderly accounted for the majority of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The C-index of the model constructed by combining the stepcox[both] and survivalSVM algorithms was 0.840 in the training cohort and 0.815 in the validation cohort, which was calculated to have the highest C-index in the testing cohort compared to the other 119 ML model combinations. Compared with current scoring systems, including the CURB-65 and several reported prognosis models previously, our model had the highest AUC value of 0.778, representing an even higher predictive performance. In addition, the model's AUC values for specific time intervals, including days 7,14 and 28, demonstrate excellent predictive performance. Most importantly, we stratified patients according to the model's risk score and demonstrated a difference in survival status between the high-risk, median-risk, and low-risk groups, which means a new and stable risk assessment system was built. Finally, we found that COVID-19 patients with a history of cerebral infarction had a significantly higher risk of death.

CONCLUSION

This novel risk assessment system is highly accurate in predicting the prognosis of patients with COVID-19, especially elderly patients with COVID-19, and can be well applied within the PPPM framework. Our ML model facilitates stratified patient management, meanwhile promoting the optimal use of healthcare resources.

摘要

背景

在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情期间,该疾病的大规模传播给全球的医疗保健和经济带来了巨大的负担。早期基于各种机器学习(ML)算法的风险评估系统可能能够为 COVID-19 患者的分类提供更准确的建议,为未来提供预测、预防和个性化医疗(PPPM)解决方案。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们将一部分数据按 7:3 的比例分为训练和验证队列,并首先基于两种 ML 算法的组合建立了一个模型。然后,我们使用另一部分数据作为独立测试队列,以确定最准确和稳定的模型,并将其与其他评分系统进行比较。最后,根据风险评分对患者进行分类,并研究其临床数据与风险评分之间的相关性。

结果

住院 COVID-19 患者以老年人为主。在训练队列中,由 stepcox[both]和 survivalSVM 算法组合构建的模型的 C 指数为 0.840,在验证队列中为 0.815,与其他 119 种 ML 模型组合相比,在测试队列中计算得出的 C 指数最高。与包括 CURB-65 和之前报道的几种预后模型在内的当前评分系统相比,我们的模型 AUC 值最高,为 0.778,代表了更高的预测性能。此外,该模型在 7、14 和 28 天等特定时间间隔的 AUC 值也表现出出色的预测性能。最重要的是,我们根据模型的风险评分对患者进行分层,并证明了高危、中危和低危组之间的生存状态存在差异,这意味着建立了一个新的、稳定的风险评估系统。最后,我们发现有脑梗死病史的 COVID-19 患者的死亡风险显著增加。

结论

该新型风险评估系统在预测 COVID-19 患者的预后方面具有高度准确性,特别是 COVID-19 老年患者,可在 PPPM 框架内得到很好的应用。我们的 ML 模型便于对患者进行分层管理,同时促进了医疗资源的最佳利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a5/11471604/99edd740defa/fimmu-15-1430899-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a5/11471604/991241fc24af/fimmu-15-1430899-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a5/11471604/0a99d7a67a8c/fimmu-15-1430899-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a5/11471604/cc29e72c687a/fimmu-15-1430899-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a5/11471604/12e679d7b81c/fimmu-15-1430899-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a5/11471604/99edd740defa/fimmu-15-1430899-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a5/11471604/991241fc24af/fimmu-15-1430899-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a5/11471604/0a99d7a67a8c/fimmu-15-1430899-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a5/11471604/cc29e72c687a/fimmu-15-1430899-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a5/11471604/12e679d7b81c/fimmu-15-1430899-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a5/11471604/99edd740defa/fimmu-15-1430899-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a COVID-19 early risk assessment system based on multiple machine learning algorithms and routine blood tests: a real-world study.基于多种机器学习算法和常规血液检测的 COVID-19 早期风险评估系统的开发:一项真实世界研究。
Front Immunol. 2024 Sep 30;15:1430899. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1430899. eCollection 2024.
2
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the remote early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对远程早期检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05241-5.
3
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Tool to Rule Out COVID-19 Among Adults in the Emergency Department Using Routine Blood Tests: A Large, Multicenter, Real-World Study.利用常规血液检测排除急诊科成人COVID-19的机器学习工具的开发与外部验证:一项大型、多中心、真实世界研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 2;22(12):e24048. doi: 10.2196/24048.
4
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the Remote Early Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的远程早期检测的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05643-5.
5
The Development and Validation of Simplified Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Multicenter, Retrospective Study.中文译文:简化机器学习算法预测 COVID-19 住院患者预后的开发和验证:多中心回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 21;24(1):e31549. doi: 10.2196/31549.
6
Machine learning algorithms for predicting COVID-19 mortality in Ethiopia.用于预测埃塞俄比亚 COVID-19 死亡率的机器学习算法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):1728. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19196-0.
7
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
8
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
9
Learning From Past Respiratory Infections to Predict COVID-19 Outcomes: Retrospective Study.从既往呼吸道感染预测 COVID-19 结局:回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 22;23(2):e23026. doi: 10.2196/23026.
10
Admission blood tests predicting survival of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients: a practical implementation of graph convolution network in imbalance dataset.入院血液检测预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者的生存:不平衡数据集图卷积网络的实际应用。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 9;24(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09699-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Repurposing Drugs for the Treatment of COVID-19 and Its Cardiovascular Manifestations.药物再利用治疗 COVID-19 及其心血管表现。
Circ Res. 2023 May 12;132(10):1374-1386. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321879. Epub 2023 May 11.
2
Machine Learning-Based Prognostic Model for Patients After Lung Transplantation.基于机器学习的肺移植术后患者预后模型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2312022. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12022.
3
Use of machine learning-based integration to develop a monocyte differentiation-related signature for improving prognosis in patients with sepsis.
利用基于机器学习的整合,开发单核细胞分化相关特征,以改善脓毒症患者的预后。
Mol Med. 2023 Mar 20;29(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s10020-023-00634-5.
4
Current and Emerging Knowledge in COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎的现状与新进展。
Radiology. 2023 Feb;306(2):e222462. doi: 10.1148/radiol.222462. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
5
Elevated ubiquitination contributes to protective immunity against severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.泛素化水平升高有助于针对严重 SARS-CoV-2 感染产生保护性免疫。
Clin Transl Med. 2022 Dec;12(12):e1103. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1103.
6
Health economic burden of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯 COVID-19 的健康经济负担。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;10:927494. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.927494. eCollection 2022.
7
Elevated D-dimer and Adverse In-hospital Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients and Synergism with Hyperglycemia.新冠患者中D-二聚体升高与不良院内结局及与高血糖的协同作用
Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Jul 12;15:3683-3691. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S367012. eCollection 2022.
8
International comparisons of laboratory values from the 4CE collaborative to predict COVID-19 mortality.来自4CE合作项目的实验室值的国际比较,以预测新冠病毒疾病死亡率。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jun 13;5(1):74. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00601-0.
9
Machine learning-based integration develops an immune-derived lncRNA signature for improving outcomes in colorectal cancer.基于机器学习的整合开发了一种免疫源性 lncRNA 特征,用于改善结直肠癌的预后。
Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 10;13(1):816. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28421-6.
10
Progressive left and right heart dysfunction in coronavirus disease-19: Prospective echocardiographic evaluation.新型冠状病毒病 19 中左心和右心进行性功能障碍:前瞻性超声心动图评估。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Feb 22;23(3):319-325. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab268.