Donowitz L G
Pediatrics. 1986 Jan;77(1):35-8.
In a pediatric intensive care unit we conducted a 1-year prospective study of 454 patients to determine whether wearing a gown decreased the overall nosocomial infection rate, incidence of intravascular catheter colonization, breaks in handwashing technique, and traffic. The overall infection rate was 26 (13%) of 198 admissions during the gown-wearing periods v 23 (9%) of 256 admissions for the periods when gowns were not worn (P less than .25). Of 348 intravascular catheter tips cultured 16 (4.6%) were colonized during gown-wearing periods compared with 21 (6.3%) of 330 when no gowns were worn (P less than .25). Of 78 patient contacts 54 (69%) were followed by no handwashing during gown-wearing periods and 59 (70%) of 84 contacts were followed by no handwashing during periods when no gowns were worn. The mean occurrence of visits per patient per hour and total visits per hour differed between gown-wearing and no-gown-wearing periods by analysis of variance, P less than .01 and P less than .005, respectively. Although traffic was decreased during periods of gown use, overgowns are an expensive, ineffective method of decreasing nosocomial infection rates, vascular catheter colonization rates, and breaks in handwashing technique.
在一家儿科重症监护病房,我们对454例患者进行了为期1年的前瞻性研究,以确定穿隔离衣是否能降低总体医院感染率、血管内导管定植发生率、洗手技术失误率以及人员流动。穿隔离衣期间的198例住院患者中,总体感染率为26例(13%),而未穿隔离衣期间的256例住院患者中为23例(9%)(P<0.25)。在穿隔离衣期间培养的348个血管内导管尖端中,有16个(4.6%)发生定植,而未穿隔离衣时330个中有21个(6.3%)(P<0.25)。在78次患者接触中,穿隔离衣期间有54次(69%)接触后未洗手,未穿隔离衣期间84次接触中有59次(70%)接触后未洗手。通过方差分析,穿隔离衣和未穿隔离衣期间每位患者每小时的平均探视次数和每小时总探视次数存在差异,P值分别<0.01和<0.005。虽然在使用隔离衣期间人员流动减少了,但一次性隔离衣是一种昂贵且无效的降低医院感染率、血管导管定植率和洗手技术失误率的方法。