Lams P M, Cocklin M L
Radiology. 1986 Jan;158(1):11-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.1.3940365.
Thirty-eight selected clinical radiographs were digitized and displayed on a 1,024-line monitor at pixel sizes of 1.6, 0.8, 0.4, and 0.2 mm. Eighteen experienced radiologists assessed the radiographs and digital images, which included 12 examples of abnormal solitary nodular density, ten examples of septal lines, and 16 controls, six of which showed diffuse lung abnormalities. For each level of spatial resolution and for film reading, observers gave their decision confidence on a sliding scale of probability. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated from these data. It was found that while spatial resolution requirements for solitary nodules were not critical for pixel sizes at or below 0.8 mm, the requirement for septal lines was likely to be 0.4 mm (1.25 line pairs/mm).
选取的38份临床X光片被数字化,并以像素大小为1.6、0.8、0.4和0.2毫米显示在1024线的监视器上。18名经验丰富的放射科医生对X光片和数字图像进行了评估,其中包括12例异常孤立结节状密度、10例间隔线和16例对照,其中6例显示弥漫性肺部异常。对于每个空间分辨率水平和胶片阅读,观察者在概率滑动量表上给出他们的决策信心。根据这些数据生成了受试者操作特征曲线。结果发现,虽然对于孤立结节,像素大小在0.8毫米或以下时空间分辨率要求并不关键,但间隔线的要求可能为0.4毫米(1.25线对/毫米)。