Koelblinger Claus, Prokop Mathias, Weber Michael, Sailer Johannes, Cartes-Zumelzu Fabiola, Schaefer-Prokop Cornelia
Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Eur Radiol. 2007 Nov;17(11):2934-40. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0650-x. Epub 2007 May 10.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of matrix size (4-K versus 2-K) in digital storage phosphor chest radiographs on image quality and on the detection of CT-proven thoracic abnormalities. In 85 patients who underwent a CT of the thorax, we obtained two additional posteroanterior storage phosphor chest radiographs, one with a matrix size of 3,520x4,280 (=4-K) and the other with a matrix size of 1,760x2,140 (=2-K). Acquisition, processing and presentation parameters were identical for all radiographs. Two radiologists evaluated the presence of mediastinal, pleural, and pulmonary abnormalities on hard copies of the radiographs, applying ROC analysis. In addition, four radiologists were asked to subjectively rank differences in image quality and to assess the demarcation of anatomic landmarks comparing the images in a blinded side-by-side manner. These data were analyzed using a two-sided binomial test with a significance level of P<0.05. Both tests, the ROC analysis of the detection performance and the binomial test of the subjective quality ratings, did not reveal significant differences between the two matrix sizes. Compared to 2-K radiographs, 4-K storage phosphor chest radiographs do not provide superior detection performance or image quality when evaluated in identical hard copy formats.
本研究的目的是评估数字存储磷光体胸部X线片的矩阵大小(4K与2K)对图像质量以及对CT证实的胸部异常检测的影响。在85例接受胸部CT检查的患者中,我们额外获取了两张后前位存储磷光体胸部X线片,一张矩阵大小为3520×4280(=4K),另一张矩阵大小为1760×2140(=2K)。所有X线片的采集、处理和显示参数均相同。两位放射科医生通过应用ROC分析,在X线片硬拷贝上评估纵隔、胸膜和肺部异常的存在情况。此外,四位放射科医生被要求主观地对图像质量差异进行排序,并以双盲并排方式比较图像来评估解剖标志的分界。使用显著性水平为P<0.05的双侧二项式检验对这些数据进行分析。检测性能的ROC分析和主观质量评级的二项式检验均未显示两种矩阵大小之间存在显著差异。与2K X线片相比,当以相同的硬拷贝格式进行评估时,4K存储磷光体胸部X线片在检测性能或图像质量方面并无优势。