• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估风险因素修正计划的影响。

Estimating the impact of risk factor modification programs.

作者信息

Browner W S

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Jan;123(1):143-53. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114208.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114208
PMID:3940433
Abstract

Most studies of the etiology and prevention of disease do not adequately address the quantitative implications of their findings for the population. This report presents a method of combining observational and experimental data to estimate the overall impact of a risk factor modification program. After the terminology is introduced, the model is applied to a categoric risk factor (serum cholesterol) for coronary heart disease, with data from the Pooling Project (1964-1974) and the Lipid Research Clinics studies (1972-1983). With optimistic assumptions about the impact of cholestyramine treatment at various cholesterol levels, about 5% of the cases of coronary heart disease in middle-aged men in the United States could be prevented; more realistic assumptions reduce that estimate by more than half. The model emphasizes the importance of estimating and comparing the overall impact of available risk factor modification programs when planning public health strategies.

摘要

大多数关于疾病病因和预防的研究并未充分探讨其研究结果对人群的量化影响。本报告提出了一种结合观察性和实验性数据的方法,以估计风险因素修正计划的总体影响。在引入术语后,该模型应用于冠心病的一个分类风险因素(血清胆固醇),使用了合并项目(1964 - 1974年)和脂质研究诊所研究(1972 - 1983年)的数据。基于对不同胆固醇水平下考来烯胺治疗效果的乐观假设,美国中年男性中约5%的冠心病病例可得到预防;而更现实的假设使这一估计减少了一半以上。该模型强调了在规划公共卫生策略时估计和比较现有风险因素修正计划总体影响的重要性。

相似文献

1
Estimating the impact of risk factor modification programs.评估风险因素修正计划的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Jan;123(1):143-53. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114208.
2
The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial.
Drugs. 1986;31 Suppl 1:53-60. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198600311-00010.
3
APPROACHES TO THE PRIMARY PREVENTION OF CLINICAL CORONARY HEART DISEASE IN HIGH-RISK, MIDDLE-AGED MEN.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963 Aug 29;97:932-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb56006.x.
4
Relative impact of targeted versus populationwide cholesterol interventions on the incidence of coronary heart disease. Projections of the Coronary Heart Disease Policy Model.针对性胆固醇干预与全人群胆固醇干预对冠心病发病率的相对影响。冠心病政策模型预测。
Circulation. 1989 Aug;80(2):254-60. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.2.254.
5
[Multifactorial primary prevention trials in ischemic heart disease].
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1985;33(2):121-33.
6
The validity of estimating heart disease reduction from a Framingham logistic equation.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 May;45(5):553-60. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90105-v.
7
Review of clinical trials: proving the lipid hypothesis.
Eur Heart J. 1990 Dec;11 Suppl H:15-20. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/11.suppl_h.15.
8
The coronary primary prevention trial: design and implementation: the Lipid Research Clinics Program.
J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(9-10):609-31. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90092-4.
9
The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial. Results of 6 years of post-trial follow-up. The Lipid Research Clinics Investigators.脂质研究诊所冠心病一级预防试验。试验后6年随访结果。脂质研究诊所研究人员。
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Jul;152(7):1399-410.
10
The benefits of treating hyperlipidemia to prevent coronary heart disease. Estimating changes in life expectancy and morbidity.治疗高脂血症以预防冠心病的益处。估计预期寿命和发病率的变化。
JAMA. 1992 Feb 12;267(6):816-22.

引用本文的文献

1
From Patients to Policy: Population Intervention Effects in Epidemiology.从患者到政策:流行病学中的人群干预效果
Epidemiology. 2017 Jul;28(4):525-528. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000648.
2
From exposures to population interventions: pregnancy and response to HIV therapy.从暴露于人群干预措施:妊娠与抗 HIV 治疗反应。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr 1;179(7):797-806. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt328. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
3
Quantifying the expected vs potential impact of a risk-factor intervention program.量化风险因素干预计划的预期影响与潜在影响。
Am J Public Health. 1997 May;87(5):867-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.5.867.
4
Physician management of hypercholesterolemia. A randomized trial of continuing medical education.高胆固醇血症的医生管理。一项继续医学教育的随机试验。
West J Med. 1994 Dec;161(6):572-8.
5
Sample size and power based on the population attributable fraction.基于人群归因分数的样本量和检验效能。
Am J Public Health. 1989 Sep;79(9):1289-94. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.9.1289.
6
Standards, guidelines and clinical policies. Health Services Research Group.标准、指南及临床政策。卫生服务研究组。
CMAJ. 1992 Mar 15;146(6):833-7.
7
Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health.根据改善护理对健康的预期影响来选择护理质量衡量标准。
Health Serv Res. 1992 Dec;27(5):619-50.