Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 15;19(10):e0311977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311977. eCollection 2024.
To explore neonatal assessments that include an element of evaluating skin colour in neonates of black, Asian and minority ethnicities, focusing on the Apgar score, presence of cyanosis and presence of jaundice.
We employed focused ethnography involving diverse healthcare professionals (HCPs) and parents or caregivers with Black, Asian, or ethnic minority children born in the last five years. Zoom interviews were performed following a semi-structured interview guide. Ethnographic data analysis was conducted using NVivo software.
There was a lack of consistency in how HCPs applied the Apgar scores, which also varied from textbook guidelines. The use of pink as a skin colour descriptor for ethnic minority neonates created a divide among both parents and HCPs. HCPs relied more heavily on other elements of the Apgar score or infant breathing and crying at birth to gauge infant wellness. When identifying cyanosis, HCPs depend on specific body locations for accurate assessment of oxygenation, but the limitations of visual assessment are acknowledged. For jaundice, most HCPs recognised the difficulty in identifying the colour yellow in infants with darker skin tones. HCPs focussed on yellowing of the sclera and gums and other well-being assessments to detect jaundice. Some interviewed parents noticed jaundice in their infants before HCPs but felt they were not listened to when raising concerns. HCPs acknowledged the need for additional training to effectively assess the health of ethnic minority infants.
This study highlights disparities in neonatal health assessment from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and parents from diverse backgrounds. Varied practices in determining the Apgar score and recognising cyanosis and jaundice signal the need for standardised protocols, appropriate educational materials, and targeted training. Addressing these challenges is vital for equitable care, emphasising comprehensive training and bias mitigation efforts in maternal and neonatal healthcare.
探讨包括评估黑人、亚洲和少数族裔新生儿肤色在内的新生儿评估方法,重点关注阿普加评分、发绀和黄疸的存在。
我们采用了聚焦民族志方法,涉及来自不同背景的医疗保健专业人员(HCP)和在过去五年内生育了黑人、亚洲或少数族裔儿童的父母或照顾者。Zoom 访谈在半结构化访谈指南的指导下进行。使用 NVivo 软件对民族志数据进行了分析。
HCP 应用阿普加评分的方式缺乏一致性,而且与教科书指南也存在差异。将粉红色用作少数民族新生儿的肤色描述符,在父母和 HCP 之间造成了分歧。HCP 更多地依赖阿普加评分的其他要素或婴儿出生时的呼吸和哭声来评估婴儿的健康状况。在识别发绀时,HCP 依赖于特定的身体部位来准确评估氧合情况,但也承认视觉评估的局限性。对于黄疸,大多数 HCP 认识到在肤色较深的婴儿中识别黄色的困难。HCP 专注于巩膜和牙龈的变黄以及其他健康评估来检测黄疸。一些接受采访的父母在 HCP 之前就注意到他们的婴儿有黄疸,但当提出担忧时,他们感到自己没有被倾听。HCP 承认需要额外的培训,以有效地评估少数族裔婴儿的健康状况。
本研究从不同背景的医疗保健专业人员和父母的角度强调了新生儿健康评估中的差异。在确定阿普加评分以及识别发绀和黄疸方面的不同做法表明需要标准化的方案、适当的教育材料和有针对性的培训。解决这些挑战对于公平护理至关重要,强调在产妇和新生儿保健方面进行全面培训和减轻偏见的努力。