Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Spain.
Emerg Med J. 2024 Nov 21;41(12):736-741. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213427.
The WHO recognises patient safety as a serious public health problem. The COVID-19 pandemic affected adult EDs (AEDs) and paediatric EDs (PEDs) differently. We compared the culture of safety in the adult AED and PED before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
A quasi-experimental study was performed. In 2019, we conducted a survey using the Spanish-adapted Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture open to all staff (doctors, nurses and paediatric residents) in AED and PED. This survey provides scores for 12 separate domains and a global assessment of safety (scale 0-10). The survey was repeated in 2021 after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. After the second survey, the researchers constructed a Pareto Chart (based on the responses from the surveys), demonstrating the most important problems to develop improvement proposals.
The 2019 questionnaire was completed by 125 AED workers and 65 PED workers. The 2021 questionnaire was completed by 79 AED workers and 50 PED workers. The global assessment of safety in the AED was 6.13 points at baseline and increased to 7.58 points (p<0.001) after COVID-19. The global assessment for the PED was 6.8 points at baseline and increased to 7.62 points after COVID-19 (p<0.001). In both services, the dimension that was most favourably assessed was 'Teamwork in the Service' while 'Provision of Staff' was least favourably assessed. The Pareto charts showed four dimensions contributing more than 50% of negative responses: 'Provision of staff' and 'Hospital Management support for patient safety' coincided in both services.
The baseline perception of the culture of safety was higher in the PED but improved in both services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adverse situations can provide an opportunity to improve patient safety culture.
世界卫生组织将患者安全视为严重的公共卫生问题。COVID-19 大流行对成人急诊科(AED)和儿科急诊科(PED)的影响不同。我们比较了 COVID-19 大流行前后成人 AED 和儿科 PED 的安全文化。
采用准实验研究。2019 年,我们对 AED 和 PED 所有工作人员(医生、护士和儿科住院医师)进行了一项使用西班牙语改编的医院患者安全文化调查。该调查提供了 12 个单独领域和安全总体评估(0-10 分)的分数。大流行第一波过后,我们在 2021 年再次进行了调查。第二次调查后,研究人员根据调查结果构建了帕累托图(基于调查结果),展示了最重要的问题,以制定改进建议。
2019 年问卷完成了 125 名 AED 工作人员和 65 名 PED 工作人员。2021 年问卷完成了 79 名 AED 工作人员和 50 名 PED 工作人员。AED 的安全总体评估基线为 6.13 分,COVID-19 后增加至 7.58 分(p<0.001)。PED 的安全总体评估基线为 6.8 分,COVID-19 后增加至 7.62 分(p<0.001)。在这两个服务中,评估最有利的维度是“服务中的团队合作”,而评估最不利的维度是“员工配备”。帕累托图显示,四个维度贡献了超过 50%的负面反应:“员工配备”和“医院管理层对患者安全的支持”在两个服务中都存在。
COVID-19 大流行期间,PED 的安全文化基线感知较高,但两个服务都有所改善。不良情况可能为改善患者安全文化提供机会。