Suppr超能文献

心胸外科领域的编辑多样性与期刊影响因子及作者多样性相关。

Editorial diversity correlates with journal impact factor and author diversity in cardiothoracic surgery.

作者信息

Martins Russell Seth, Umar Zainab, Amir Muhammad Ali, Jogezai Zulfiqar Haider, Ahmed Warda, Barolia Mehak, Razi Syed Shahzad, Poulikidis Kostantinos, Latif M Jawad, Martin Linda W, Molena Daniela, Bhora Faiz Y

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, JFK University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian Health, Edison, New Jersey, USA.

Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2025 Feb;49(2):429-436. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12359. Epub 2024 Oct 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

While there are no widely accepted diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) metrics for journals, geographic and sex diversity across a journal's editorial board may provide a surrogate measure of its commitment to DEI. We explored the association between journal quality and DEI metrics for cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) journals and investigated whether editorial diversity correlates with diversity across published articles.

METHODS

We collected the following data for 30 CTS journals: country of publication (categorized by income level), journal quality metrics (citation-based metrics, e.g., impact factor (IF) or H-index), and sex and geographic representation across editorial boards and published articles. Bivariate correlations between numeric variables were assessed using Spearman's correlation.

RESULTS

Female representation across editorial boards was 12.1%. Most editorial board members belonged to the United States (35.2%), with only 7.4% from the lower-middle-income countries and 0% from low-income countries. IF showed a strong positive correlation with female editorial representation (r = 0.70) but an inverse correlation with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) editorial representation (r = -0.45). Female editorial representation demonstrated a significant positive correlation with female first authorship (r = 0.45), whereas LMIC editorial representation correlated strongly with LMIC corresponding authorship (r = 0.85).

CONCLUSION

Women and researchers from LMICs are in the minority across editorial boards of CTS journals. However, a strong correlation between journal H-index and female editorial representation indicates that top-ranked journals are spearheading efforts to improve equitable sex-based and gender representations. Similar efforts are required to ensure more global geographic representation across editorial boards and top-ranked CTS journals are the best placed to lead by example.

摘要

引言

虽然目前尚无广泛认可的期刊多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)指标,但期刊编辑委员会的地域和性别多样性或许可以作为衡量其对DEI承诺的替代指标。我们探讨了心胸外科(CTS)期刊的质量与DEI指标之间的关联,并研究了编辑多样性与发表文章的多样性之间是否存在相关性。

方法

我们收集了30种CTS期刊的以下数据:出版国家(按收入水平分类)、期刊质量指标(基于引用的指标,如影响因子(IF)或H指数),以及编辑委员会和发表文章中的性别和地域代表性。使用Spearman相关性评估数值变量之间的双变量相关性。

结果

编辑委员会中女性的占比为12.1%。大多数编辑委员会成员来自美国(35.2%),来自中低收入国家的仅占7.4%,来自低收入国家的占0%。IF与编辑委员会中的女性占比呈强正相关(r = 0.70),但与中低收入国家(LMICs)编辑委员会成员占比呈负相关(r = -0.45)。编辑委员会中的女性占比与女性第一作者身份呈显著正相关(r = 0.45),而LMIC编辑委员会成员占比与LMIC通讯作者身份呈强相关(r = 0.85)。

结论

在CTS期刊的编辑委员会中,女性和来自LMICs的研究人员占少数。然而,期刊H指数与编辑委员会中女性占比之间的强相关性表明,排名靠前的期刊正在带头努力改善基于性别的公平代表性。需要做出类似努力,以确保编辑委员会中有更多全球地域代表性,而排名靠前的CTS期刊最适合以身作则发挥引领作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验