Suppr超能文献

农村人群的产前母乳喂养教育(含或不含手挤母乳)与母乳喂养持续时间

Prenatal Breastfeeding Education with or without Hand Expressing Human Milk and Breastfeeding Duration in a Rural Population.

机构信息

College for Health, Community, and Policy, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.

Nacogdoches Women's Center, Nacogdoches, TX 75965, USA.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2024 Sep 29;16(19):3303. doi: 10.3390/nu16193303.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefits of breastfeeding are well recognized. However, exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rates are well below the Healthy People 2030 Guidelines, with a rapid drop in exclusive breastfeeding over the first 3 months of life. Although breastfeeding support has increased the initiation of breastfeeding, the role of perinatal interventions, particularly in the context of breastfeeding support, remains a topic of contradiction.

METHODS

This observational study was designed to assess the impact of a unique prenatal educational intervention in rural East Texas. The study had two aims: (1) to determine whether the addition of prenatal breastfeeding education increased the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at four time points, and (2) to assess the impact of hand expression education on breastfeeding exclusivity.

RESULTS

Differences in breastfeeding behaviors were seen between those who received the education and those who did not for exclusivity and duration of breastfeeding. Participants who received the hand expression education were 1.79 times more likely to continue EBF practices at three months postpartum, 6.27 times more likely to continue EBF practices at six months postpartum, and 3.34 times more likely to continue breastfeeding at twelve months postpartum than those who did not receive any hand expression education.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that prenatal education is beneficial for increasing breastfeeding exclusivity and duration and underscores its potential to improve maternal and infant health outcomes. Further research is needed to resolve the ongoing debate and advance our understanding of interventions to increase breastfeeding duration.

摘要

背景

母乳喂养的益处已得到广泛认可。然而,纯母乳喂养(EBF)率远低于《2030 年健康人群》指南,而且在生命的头 3 个月,纯母乳喂养率迅速下降。尽管母乳喂养支持增加了母乳喂养的开始率,但围产期干预的作用,特别是在母乳喂养支持的背景下,仍然是一个存在争议的话题。

方法

本观察性研究旨在评估在德克萨斯州东部农村地区进行的一项独特的产前教育干预的效果。该研究有两个目的:(1)确定产前母乳喂养教育的增加是否会在四个时间点提高纯母乳喂养率;(2)评估手部挤奶教育对母乳喂养的影响。

结果

在纯母乳喂养率和母乳喂养持续时间方面,接受教育和未接受教育的参与者之间存在差异。与未接受手部挤奶教育的参与者相比,接受手部挤奶教育的参与者在产后三个月继续纯母乳喂养的可能性高出 1.79 倍,在产后六个月继续纯母乳喂养的可能性高出 6.27 倍,在产后十二个月继续母乳喂养的可能性高出 3.34 倍。

结论

本研究表明,产前教育有益于提高母乳喂养的纯母乳喂养率和持续时间,并强调了其改善母婴健康结果的潜力。需要进一步的研究来解决持续存在的争议,并深入了解增加母乳喂养持续时间的干预措施。

相似文献

5
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women.母乳喂养女性乳头疼痛的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 15;2014(12):CD007366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007366.pub2.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验