• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其成年人食物素养(FOODLIT)工具的改编:有效性和可靠性研究。

Adaptation of the Food Literacy (FOODLIT) Tool for Turkish Adults: A Validity and Reliability Study.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55200 Samsun, Türkiye.

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, 06490 Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2024 Oct 9;16(19):3416. doi: 10.3390/nu16193416.

DOI:10.3390/nu16193416
PMID:39408381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11478845/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Food literacy is associated with sustainable food systems and encourages individuals to adopt healthy eating habits. However, there is no validated method that can be used to measure food literacy related to sustainable food systems of Turkish adults. This research aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish adaptation of the "Food Literacy (FOODLIT) Tool" for Turkish adults.

METHODS

The study involved 328 people aged 19 to 58 years. The FOODLIT-Tool is a five-point Likert-type scale consisting of 24 items and five factors ("culinary competencies", "production and quality", "selection and planning", "environmentally safe" and "origin").

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was applied to assess internal consistency reliability, showing an excellent scale coefficient of 0.927. The model was evaluated with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The findings of the CFA suggested that the fit indices were acceptable (χ/df = 1.257, comparative fit index: 0.991, goodness-of-fit index: 0.977, normed fit index: 0.990 and root mean error of approximation: 0.028). Furthermore, there was a positive relationship between the FOODLIT-Tool score and the "Sustainable and Healthy Eating Behaviors Scale" (SHEB) score (r = 0.518, < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that the Turkish version of the FOODLIT-Tool integrated with sustainable food systems is a valid and reliable measurement tool for assessing the food literacy of Turkish adults.

摘要

背景

食品素养与可持续食品系统相关,鼓励个人养成健康的饮食习惯。然而,目前还没有经过验证的方法可以用来衡量土耳其成年人与可持续食品系统相关的食品素养。本研究旨在评估土耳其版“食品素养(FOODLIT)工具”在土耳其成年人中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

该研究涉及 328 名年龄在 19 至 58 岁之间的成年人。FOODLIT-Tool 是一个五点李克特量表,由 24 个项目和五个因素(“烹饪能力”、“生产和质量”、“选择和计划”、“环境安全”和“来源”)组成。

结果

采用克朗巴赫α系数评估内部一致性可靠性,得出极好的量表系数为 0.927。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)对模型进行评估。CFA 的结果表明,拟合指数是可接受的(χ/df = 1.257,比较拟合指数:0.991,拟合优度指数:0.977,归一化拟合指数:0.990,近似均方根误差:0.028)。此外,FOODLIT-Tool 评分与“可持续和健康饮食行为量表”(SHEB)评分之间存在正相关关系(r = 0.518, < 0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,与可持续食品系统相结合的土耳其版 FOODLIT-Tool 是一种有效且可靠的测量工具,可用于评估土耳其成年人的食品素养。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d709/11478845/7560b8d28516/nutrients-16-03416-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d709/11478845/e2187c640f69/nutrients-16-03416-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d709/11478845/79bf05ac4f4c/nutrients-16-03416-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d709/11478845/7560b8d28516/nutrients-16-03416-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d709/11478845/e2187c640f69/nutrients-16-03416-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d709/11478845/79bf05ac4f4c/nutrients-16-03416-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d709/11478845/7560b8d28516/nutrients-16-03416-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Adaptation of the Food Literacy (FOODLIT) Tool for Turkish Adults: A Validity and Reliability Study.土耳其成年人食物素养(FOODLIT)工具的改编:有效性和可靠性研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 9;16(19):3416. doi: 10.3390/nu16193416.
2
Coronavirus-related health literacy level of Turkish adults: psychometric properties of the scale.土耳其成年人与冠状病毒相关的健康素养水平:量表的心理测量学特性。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Jun 1;39(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae057.
3
Adaptation of the Food Literacy Questionnaire for school children to Turkish: validity and reliability study.儿童食物素养问卷的土耳其语适应性改编:信度和效度研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jul;182(7):3307-3316. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05010-3. Epub 2023 May 11.
4
Development and Validation of a Culture-Sensitive Generic Health Literacy Scale in Turkish-Speaking Adults.发展并验证土耳其语成年人文化敏感型通用健康素养量表。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Jan;6(1):e2-e11. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20211208-01. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
5
Turkish version of the 'food and nutrition literacy questionnaire for Chinese school-age children' for school-age adolescents: a validity and reliability study.中文版《儿童青少年食物与营养素养问卷》的土耳其语版本:一项信度和效度研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):1807. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16732-2.
6
FOODLIT-tool: Development and validation of the adaptable food literacy tool towards global sustainability within food systems.FOODLIT 工具:面向食物系统全球可持续性的可适应食物素养工具的开发与验证。
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105658. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105658. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
7
Turkish version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: preliminary results of factorial structure, reliability, and construct validity.耶鲁食物成瘾量表的土耳其语版本:因子结构、信度和结构效度的初步结果。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2019 Dec 10;38(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41043-019-0202-4.
8
Validity and reliability of the Sustainable HEalthy Diet (SHED) index by comparison with EAT-Lancet diet, Mediterranean diet in Turkish adults.土耳其成年人中可持续健康饮食(SHED)指数与 EAT-Lancet 饮食、地中海饮食的有效性和可靠性比较。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 30;12:e18120. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18120. eCollection 2024.
9
Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Adult Eating Behaviour Questionnaire for adult participants.土耳其版成人饮食行为问卷在成年参与者中的有效性和可靠性。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Nov;26(11):2218-2225. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001751. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
10
Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability of the US Adult Food Security Survey Module in university students.土耳其大学生美国成人粮食安全调查模块的适应、验证和可靠性。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Jan 22;27(1):e45. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000223.

引用本文的文献

1
Nutrition and Food Security for All: A Step Towards the Future.人人享有营养与粮食安全:迈向未来的一步。
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 2;17(7):1241. doi: 10.3390/nu17071241.

本文引用的文献

1
Nutrition and Food Literacy: Framing the Challenges to Health Communication.营养与食品素养:健康传播面临的挑战。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 7;15(22):4708. doi: 10.3390/nu15224708.
2
Teaching nutrition and sustainable food systems: justification and an applied approach.教授营养与可持续食品系统:理由及应用方法。
Front Nutr. 2023 Sep 27;10:1167180. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1167180. eCollection 2023.
3
Turkish version of the 'food and nutrition literacy questionnaire for Chinese school-age children' for school-age adolescents: a validity and reliability study.
中文版《儿童青少年食物与营养素养问卷》的土耳其语版本:一项信度和效度研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):1807. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16732-2.
4
Nutrition and Healthy Aging: A Review.营养与健康老龄化:综述
Curr Nutr Rep. 2023 Sep;12(3):369-375. doi: 10.1007/s13668-023-00473-0. Epub 2023 May 16.
5
Actions now can curb food systems fallout from COVID-19.现在采取行动可以遏制新冠疫情对粮食系统的影响。
Nat Food. 2020 Jun;1(6):319-320. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0085-y.
6
Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions.食物系统产生的温室气体排放量占全球人为温室气体排放总量的三分之一。
Nat Food. 2021 Mar;2(3):198-209. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
7
Development, validation and item reduction of a food literacy questionnaire (IFLQ-19) with Australian adults.开发、验证和精简澳大利亚成年人食物素养问卷(IFLQ-19)。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 1;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01351-8.
8
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Sustainable and Healthy Eating Behaviors Scale.土耳其版可持续健康饮食行为量表的效度与信度
Br J Nutr. 2022 Aug 8:1-20. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522002525.
9
Higher food literacy scores are associated with healthier diet quality in children and adolescents: the development and validation of a two-dimensional food literacy measurement tool for children and adolescents.较高的食物素养得分与儿童和青少年更健康的饮食质量相关:一种用于儿童和青少年的二维食物素养测量工具的开发与验证。
Nutr Res Pract. 2022 Apr;16(2):272-283. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2022.16.2.272. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
10
The Validation and Improvement of a Food Literacy Behavior Checklist for Food Literacy Programs.食品素养行为清单在食品素养项目中的验证与改进。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;18(24):13282. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413282.