• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品素养行为清单在食品素养项目中的验证与改进。

The Validation and Improvement of a Food Literacy Behavior Checklist for Food Literacy Programs.

机构信息

School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6102, Australia.

Foodbank Western Australia, Perth 6105, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;18(24):13282. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413282.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182413282
PMID:34948890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8701925/
Abstract

Food literacy is a multidimensional construct required to achieve diet quality. The Food Sensations for Adults (FSA) program aims to improve the food literacy of low to middle-income adults living in Western Australia and is funded by the Western Australian Department of Health. The original published behavior checklist used to measure change in food literacy has been revised based on experience of the facilitators and the iterative development of the program. This research sought to assess the validity and reliability of the improved food literacy behavior checklist. A total of 1,359 participants completed the checklist over an 18-month period. Content, face, and construct validity were considered in the re-development of the checklist. An exploratory factor analysis of the checklist identified three factors: (1) Plan and Manage, (2) Selection, and (3) Preparation. Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.883, 0.760, and 0.868 were found for each of the three factors respectively. These coefficients indicated good internal consistency and were higher than those found in the original checklist analysis. An external validation was undertaken with the original food literacy behavior checklist, and a strong positive relationship between the two tools was found. In addition to being used to evaluate FSA, this revised and extensively validated tool could provide guidance to others evaluating similar food literacy programs and contribute to international measurement research.

摘要

食品素养是实现饮食质量所必需的多维结构。成人食品感官(FSA)计划旨在提高生活在西澳大利亚州的中低收入成年人的食品素养,由西澳大利亚州卫生部资助。用于衡量食品素养变化的原始发布行为清单已根据促进者的经验和计划的迭代开发进行了修订。这项研究旨在评估改进后的食品素养行为清单的有效性和可靠性。共有 1359 名参与者在 18 个月的时间内完成了清单。在重新开发清单时考虑了内容、表面和结构有效性。清单的探索性因素分析确定了三个因素:(1)计划和管理,(2)选择和(3)准备。三个因素的克朗巴赫α系数分别为 0.883、0.760 和 0.868。这些系数表明内部一致性良好,高于原始清单分析中发现的系数。对原始食品素养行为清单进行了外部验证,发现这两个工具之间存在很强的正相关关系。除了用于评估 FSA 外,这个经过修订和广泛验证的工具还可以为评估类似食品素养计划的其他人提供指导,并为国际测量研究做出贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c7/8701925/657788384ea7/ijerph-18-13282-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c7/8701925/ad1541ae4401/ijerph-18-13282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c7/8701925/657788384ea7/ijerph-18-13282-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c7/8701925/ad1541ae4401/ijerph-18-13282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c7/8701925/657788384ea7/ijerph-18-13282-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Validation and Improvement of a Food Literacy Behavior Checklist for Food Literacy Programs.食品素养行为清单在食品素养项目中的验证与改进。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;18(24):13282. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413282.
2
Evaluation Tool Development for Food Literacy Programs.食品素养计划评估工具的开发。
Nutrients. 2018 Nov 2;10(11):1617. doi: 10.3390/nu10111617.
3
Development of a tool for food literacy assessment for young adults: Findings from a Korean validation study.开发适用于年轻人的食物素养评估工具:来自韩国验证研究的结果。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2020;29(4):876-882. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202012_29(4).0024.
4
Development of a Comprehensive Food Literacy Measurement Tool Integrating the Food System and Sustainability.开发一个综合的食品素养测量工具,整合食品系统和可持续性。
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 28;12(11):3300. doi: 10.3390/nu12113300.
5
Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults.开发和验证用于中国成年人的食物和营养素养问卷
Nutrients. 2022 May 5;14(9):1933. doi: 10.3390/nu14091933.
6
Effectiveness of Foodbank Western Australia's for Adults Food Literacy Program in Regional Australia.西澳大利亚食品银行成年人食品素养计划在澳大利亚地区的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;18(17):8920. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178920.
7
Development of the Health Awareness and Behaviour Tool (HABiT): reliability and suitability for a Canadian older adult population.健康意识与行为工具(HABiT)的开发:加拿大老年人群体的可靠性与适用性
J Health Popul Nutr. 2019 Dec 4;38(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41043-019-0206-0.
8
Assessing factorial and convergent validity and reliability of a food behaviour checklist for Spanish-speaking participants in US Department of Agriculture nutrition education programmes.评估美国农业部营养教育计划中讲西班牙语的参与者的食物行为检查表的因子和收敛有效性和可靠性。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Jul;14(7):1165-76. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010003058. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
9
Development and validation of the reproductive health literacy questionnaire for Chinese unmarried youth.中文未婚青年生殖健康素养问卷的编制及信效度检验
Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01278-6.
10
Development, validation and item reduction of a food literacy questionnaire (IFLQ-19) with Australian adults.开发、验证和精简澳大利亚成年人食物素养问卷(IFLQ-19)。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 1;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01351-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between oral health literacy and changes in self-assessment of oral health during COVID-19.COVID-19期间口腔健康素养与口腔健康自我评估变化之间的关系
J Dent Sci. 2025 Jan;20(1):569-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.04.015. Epub 2024 May 3.
2
Analysing the behaviour change techniques in an effective food literacy program to inform future program design.分析有效食品素养计划中的行为改变技巧,为未来的计划设计提供参考。
Nutr Diet. 2025 Jun;82(3):268-282. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12908. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
3
Adaptation of the Food Literacy (FOODLIT) Tool for Turkish Adults: A Validity and Reliability Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of Food Literacy Assessment Tool Targeting Adults With Low Income.开发针对低收入成年人的食品素养评估工具。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021 Nov;53(11):966-976. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
2
Measuring Food Literacy: Progressing the Development of an International Food Literacy Survey Using a Content Validity Study.测量食物素养:利用内容效度研究推进国际食物素养调查的发展。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 28;18(3):1141. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031141.
3
A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults.
土耳其成年人食物素养(FOODLIT)工具的改编:有效性和可靠性研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 9;16(19):3416. doi: 10.3390/nu16193416.
成人食品素养测量工具的效度、信度和概念一致性的范围综述
Nutrients. 2019 Apr 8;11(4):801. doi: 10.3390/nu11040801.
4
Effectiveness of an Adult Food Literacy Program.成人食品素养计划的有效性。
Nutrients. 2019 Apr 7;11(4):797. doi: 10.3390/nu11040797.
5
Validity and Reliability of a Food Skills Questionnaire.食物技能问卷的有效性和可靠性。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Jul-Aug;51(7):857-864. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
6
Complexities in Conceptualizing and Measuring Food Literacy.概念化和衡量食品素养的复杂性。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Apr;119(4):563-573. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.10.015. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
7
Evaluation Tool Development for Food Literacy Programs.食品素养计划评估工具的开发。
Nutrients. 2018 Nov 2;10(11):1617. doi: 10.3390/nu10111617.
8
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
9
Towards the measurement of food literacy with respect to healthy eating: the development and validation of the self perceived food literacy scale among an adult sample in the Netherlands.针对健康饮食的食物素养衡量方法:荷兰成年人样本中自我感知食物素养量表的编制与验证。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 18;15(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0687-z.
10
Impact of Cooking and Home Food Preparation Interventions Among Adults: A Systematic Review (2011-2016).成人烹饪和家庭食品准备干预措施的影响:系统评价(2011-2016 年)。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Feb;50(2):148-172.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Sep 25.