• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其大学生美国成人粮食安全调查模块的适应、验证和可靠性。

Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability of the US Adult Food Security Survey Module in university students.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Karamanoglu Mehmetbey, Karaman, Turkey.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2024 Jan 22;27(1):e45. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000223.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980024000223
PMID:38250752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10882535/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the US Adult Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study collected data from 117 university students. The AFSSM questionnaire was completed by all participants. Psychometric evaluation for scale, content, construct, and convergent validity and reliability of the scale was tested. The construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data collected from university students. Cronbach's (internal consistency) and composite reliability were used to assess the reliability ( < 0·05).

SETTING

Students were recruited from the university.

PARTICIPANTS

This research was conducted with volunteer university students with a mean age of 22·74 ± 4·19 years.

RESULTS

Three factors were extracted from eight items through EFA: (1) inadequate nutrition, (2) economic concern and (3) hunger. These factors accounted for 77·4 % of the total variance, and factor loadings ranged from 0·755 to 0·953. Cronbach's was 0·769. The results of the CFA suggested the fit indices were acceptable (χ/sd = 0·235, root mean error of approximation: 0·034, goodness-of-fit index: 0·994, comparative fit index: 0·992 and normed fit index: 0·986).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that validates and reports the Turkish version of AFSSM in university students, and the results of our study show that the Turkish AFSSM is a valid and reliable tool for determining food security in university students. AFSSM can be used by researchers to examine the food security of university students.

摘要

目的

评估美国成人粮食安全调查模块(AFSSM)土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。

设计

这是一项横断面研究,共纳入 117 名大学生,所有参与者均完成了 AFSSM 问卷。对量表的刻度、内容、结构和聚合效度及信度进行了心理测量学评估。通过对大学生数据进行探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)评估结构效度。采用克朗巴赫α系数(内部一致性)和综合可靠性评估信度(<0.05)。

地点

学生在大学中招募。

参与者

本研究招募了平均年龄为 22.74±4.19 岁的志愿大学生。

结果

通过 EFA 从 8 个项目中提取出 3 个因子:(1)营养不足,(2)经济担忧,(3)饥饿。这 3 个因子共解释了总方差的 77.4%,因子负荷在 0.755~0.953 之间。克朗巴赫α系数为 0.769。CFA 的结果表明拟合指数可接受(χ/sd=0.235,近似均方根误差:0.034,拟合优度指数:0.994,比较拟合指数:0.992,归一化拟合指数:0.986)。

结论

这是第一项在大学生中验证和报告 AFSSM 土耳其语版本的研究,我们的研究结果表明,土耳其语 AFSSM 是一种在大学生中确定粮食安全状况的有效且可靠的工具。AFSSM 可被研究者用于评估大学生的粮食安全状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50c8/10882535/b04060930f84/S1368980024000223_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50c8/10882535/d75d0e9004d2/S1368980024000223_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50c8/10882535/b04060930f84/S1368980024000223_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50c8/10882535/d75d0e9004d2/S1368980024000223_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50c8/10882535/b04060930f84/S1368980024000223_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability of the US Adult Food Security Survey Module in university students.土耳其大学生美国成人粮食安全调查模块的适应、验证和可靠性。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Jan 22;27(1):e45. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000223.
2
Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Food-Mood Questionnaire for university students.大学生食物-情绪问卷土耳其语版本的效度和信度
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Nov 5;25(4):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004377.
3
Adaptation of the Food Literacy Questionnaire for school children to Turkish: validity and reliability study.儿童食物素养问卷的土耳其语适应性改编:信度和效度研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jul;182(7):3307-3316. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05010-3. Epub 2023 May 11.
4
Psychometric properties of the newly developed self-report environmental determinants of health questionnaire (EDH-Q): development and validation.新开发的自我报告健康环境决定因素问卷(EDH-Q)的心理测量学特性:编制与验证。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 13;12(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01782-x.
5
Psychometric properties of the social determinants of health questionnaire (SDH-Q): development and validation.健康的社会决定因素问卷(SDH-Q)的心理计量特性:编制与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):2507. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19990-w.
6
The Chinese version of the general benefit finding scale (GBFS): Psychometric properties in a sample of college students.一般效益发现量表(GBFS)中文版:大学生样本中的心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2024 May 7;19(5):e0300064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300064. eCollection 2024.
7
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire in Patients with Epilepsy.癫痫患者成人饮食行为问卷波斯文版的心理测量特性。
Iran J Med Sci. 2022 May;47(3):236-247. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2021.89396.2011.
9
The Turkish version of the Patient Safety Competency Self-Evaluation Tool: A validity and reliability study.《患者安全能力自我评估工具土耳其语版:有效性和可靠性研究》。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Nov;57:103229. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103229. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
10
Adaptation of the Food Literacy (FOODLIT) Tool for Turkish Adults: A Validity and Reliability Study.土耳其成年人食物素养(FOODLIT)工具的改编:有效性和可靠性研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 9;16(19):3416. doi: 10.3390/nu16193416.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting food security in 2021: an overview of the past year.2021年的粮食安全再审视:过去一年概述
Food Secur. 2022;14(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s12571-022-01266-z. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
Household food insecurity is associated with binge-eating disorder and obesity.家庭食物不安全与暴饮暴食症及肥胖症相关。
Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Dec 19. doi: 10.1002/eat.22990.
3
Food insecurity and adult weight abnormality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.食物不安全与成人体重异常风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Nutr. 2019 Feb;58(1):45-61. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1819-6. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
4
Preliminary validation and piloting of a comprehensive measure of household food security in Australia.澳大利亚家庭粮食安全综合测量的初步验证和试点研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Feb;21(3):526-534. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003007. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
5
How food insecurity could lead to obesity in LMICs: When not enough is too much: a realist review of how food insecurity could lead to obesity in low- and middle-income countries.粮食不安全如何导致低收入和中等收入国家的肥胖问题:当不足变成过多时:对粮食不安全如何导致低收入和中等收入国家肥胖问题的现实主义综述
Health Promot Int. 2018 Oct 1;33(5):812-826. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax026.
6
The food-insecurity obesity paradox: A resource scarcity hypothesis.粮食不安全与肥胖悖论:一种资源稀缺假说。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Aug 1;162:88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.025. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
7
Validity and reliability of food security measures.食品安全措施的有效性和可靠性。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Dec;1331:230-248. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12594. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
8
Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research.研究中使用的测量工具的有效性和可靠性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Dec 1;65(23):2276-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070364.
9
Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM.使用组内相关系数和标准误来量化重测信度。
J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):231-40. doi: 10.1519/15184.1.
10
Development of a spanish-language version of the U.S. household food security survey module.美国家庭食品安全调查模块西班牙语版本的开发。
J Nutr. 2003 Apr;133(4):1192-7. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.4.1192.