Beel J A, Stodieck L S, Luttges M W
Exp Neurol. 1986 Jan;91(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(86)90023-3.
The biomechanics of spinal nerve roots obtained from normal and nerve-crushed mice were evaluated. Photographs and longitudinal force measurements were taken as nerve roots were elongated through mechanical failure. Proportional limit stress and strain as well as the apparent modulus were calculated from photographic and force measurements to characterize nerve root strength, elasticity, and stiffness, respectively. Resulting mechanical data were indicative of an extremely weak material. Comparisons of nerve and nerve root mechanical properties revealed major differences. While nerve root elasticity was comparable to nerve, nerve root strength was only 10% that of nerve and root stiffness was only 20% of nerve values. Differences in nerve and root mechanics are attributed to the large discrepancies in relative amounts of connective tissue. Also in sharp contrast with peripheral nerve, unilateral nerve crush produced no significant alterations in root mechanics. Comparisons of nerve and nerve root strengths suggested possible pathways for dissipation of peripherally applied forces through epineurial and dural structures.
对从正常小鼠和神经挤压损伤小鼠获取的脊神经根的生物力学进行了评估。当神经根通过机械性破坏而被拉长时,拍摄了照片并进行了纵向力测量。根据照片和力的测量结果计算比例极限应力和应变以及表观模量,以分别表征神经根的强度、弹性和刚度。所得的力学数据表明该材料极其脆弱。神经和神经根力学性能的比较揭示了主要差异。虽然神经根弹性与神经相当,但神经根强度仅为神经的10%,而根刚度仅为神经值的20%。神经和神经根力学的差异归因于结缔组织相对含量的巨大差异。同样与周围神经形成鲜明对比的是,单侧神经挤压并未使神经根力学产生显著改变。神经和神经根强度的比较表明,外周施加的力可能通过神经外膜和硬脑膜结构消散的途径。