• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于改进的Dempster-Shafer证据理论的隧道火灾检测方法。

A Tunnel Fire Detection Method Based on an Improved Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory.

作者信息

Wang Haiying, Shi Yuke, Chen Long, Zhang Xiaofeng

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Road Construction Technology and Equipment of Ministry of Education, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.

Shaanxi Transportation Holding Group Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710075, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 6;24(19):6455. doi: 10.3390/s24196455.

DOI:10.3390/s24196455
PMID:39409495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11479314/
Abstract

Tunnel fires are generally detected using various sensors, including measuring temperature, CO concentration, and smoke concentration. To address the ambiguity and inconsistency in multi-sensor data, this paper proposes a tunnel fire detection method based on an improved Dempster-Shafer (DS) evidence theory for multi-sensor data fusion. To solve the problem of evidence conflict in the DS theory, a two-level multi-sensor data fusion framework is adopted. The first level of fusion involves feature fusion of the same type of sensor data, removing ambiguous data to obtain characteristic data, and calculating the basic probability assignment (BPA) function through the feature interval. The second-level fusion derives basic probability numbers from the BPA, calculates the degree of evidence conflict, normalizes the BPA to obtain the relative conflict degree, and optimizes the BPA using the trust coefficient. The classical DS evidence theory is then used to integrate and obtain the probability of tunnel fire occurrence. Different heat release rates, tunnel wind speeds, and fire locations are set, forming six fire scenarios. Sensor monitoring data under each simulation condition are extracted and fused using the improved DS evidence theory. The results show that there is a 67.5%, 83.5%, 76.8%, 83%, 79.6%, and 84.1% probability of detecting fire when it occurs, respectively, and identifies fire occurrence in approximately 2.4 s, an improvement from 64.7% to 70% over traditional methods. This demonstrates the feasibility and superiority of the proposed method, highlighting its significant importance in ensuring personnel safety.

摘要

隧道火灾通常使用各种传感器进行检测,包括测量温度、一氧化碳浓度和烟雾浓度。为了解决多传感器数据中的模糊性和不一致性问题,本文提出了一种基于改进的Dempster-Shafer(DS)证据理论的多传感器数据融合隧道火灾检测方法。为了解决DS理论中的证据冲突问题,采用了两级多传感器数据融合框架。第一级融合涉及对同一类型传感器数据的特征融合,去除模糊数据以获得特征数据,并通过特征区间计算基本概率分配(BPA)函数。第二级融合从BPA导出基本概率数,计算证据冲突程度,对BPA进行归一化以获得相对冲突程度,并使用信任系数对BPA进行优化。然后使用经典的DS证据理论进行整合,得到隧道火灾发生的概率。设置了不同的热释放率、隧道风速和火灾位置,形成六种火灾场景。使用改进的DS证据理论对每个模拟条件下的传感器监测数据进行提取和融合。结果表明,火灾发生时检测到火灾的概率分别为67.5%、83.5%、76.8%、83%、79.6%和84.1%,并且在大约2.4秒内识别出火灾发生,比传统方法提高了64.7%至70%。这证明了所提方法的可行性和优越性,突出了其在确保人员安全方面的重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/327bb4f467d4/sensors-24-06455-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/88dad33b9d7e/sensors-24-06455-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/70795ffa86e5/sensors-24-06455-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/a93088eb8b3d/sensors-24-06455-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/a1350371634a/sensors-24-06455-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/0ddfd5499990/sensors-24-06455-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/e389a1640fdd/sensors-24-06455-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/778c969165cf/sensors-24-06455-g007a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/817d48d1bc32/sensors-24-06455-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/005109a4c8b4/sensors-24-06455-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/9bc0ce55b143/sensors-24-06455-g010a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/0117efe3a10a/sensors-24-06455-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/327bb4f467d4/sensors-24-06455-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/88dad33b9d7e/sensors-24-06455-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/70795ffa86e5/sensors-24-06455-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/a93088eb8b3d/sensors-24-06455-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/a1350371634a/sensors-24-06455-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/0ddfd5499990/sensors-24-06455-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/e389a1640fdd/sensors-24-06455-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/778c969165cf/sensors-24-06455-g007a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/817d48d1bc32/sensors-24-06455-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/005109a4c8b4/sensors-24-06455-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/9bc0ce55b143/sensors-24-06455-g010a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/0117efe3a10a/sensors-24-06455-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb04/11479314/327bb4f467d4/sensors-24-06455-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
A Tunnel Fire Detection Method Based on an Improved Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory.一种基于改进的Dempster-Shafer证据理论的隧道火灾检测方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 6;24(19):6455. doi: 10.3390/s24196455.
2
A Multi-Sensor Data-Fusion Method Based on Cloud Model and Improved Evidence Theory.一种基于云模型和改进证据理论的多传感器数据融合方法
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 7;22(15):5902. doi: 10.3390/s22155902.
3
Measuring the Uncertainty in the Original and Negation of Evidence Using Belief Entropy for Conflict Data Fusion.使用信念熵测量冲突数据融合中证据原始值和否定值的不确定性。
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Mar 28;23(4):402. doi: 10.3390/e23040402.
4
Conflict Data Fusion in a Multi-Agent System Premised on the Base Basic Probability Assignment and Evidence Distance.基于基本概率分配和证据距离的多智能体系统中的冲突数据融合
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Jun 28;23(7):820. doi: 10.3390/e23070820.
5
Paradox Elimination in Dempster-Shafer Combination Rule with Novel Entropy Function: Application in Decision-Level Multi-Sensor Fusion.基于新熵函数的 Dempster-Shafer 组合规则中的悖论消除:在决策级多传感器融合中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Nov 5;19(21):4810. doi: 10.3390/s19214810.
6
Fire Control System Operation Status Assessment Based on Information Fusion: Case Study.基于信息融合的火控系统运行状态评估:案例研究
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 14;19(10):2222. doi: 10.3390/s19102222.
7
Multi-Source Information Fusion Based on Negation of Reconstructed Basic Probability Assignment with Padded Gaussian Distribution and Belief Entropy.基于带填充高斯分布的重构基本概率赋值的否定和信念熵的多源信息融合
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Aug 21;24(8):1164. doi: 10.3390/e24081164.
8
A New Reliability Coefficient Using Betting Commitment Evidence Distance in Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory for Uncertain Information Fusion.一种基于邓普斯特-谢弗证据理论中投注承诺证据距离的不确定信息融合新可靠性系数
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;25(3):462. doi: 10.3390/e25030462.
9
Measuring Uncertainty in the Negation Evidence for Multi-Source Information Fusion.多源信息融合中否定证据的不确定性度量
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Nov 2;24(11):1596. doi: 10.3390/e24111596.
10
A Novel Method for Intelligent Single Fault Detection of Bearings Using SAE and Improved D-S Evidence Theory.一种基于自注意力机制(SAE)和改进的D-S证据理论的轴承智能单故障检测新方法。
Entropy (Basel). 2019 Jul 13;21(7):687. doi: 10.3390/e21070687.

引用本文的文献

1
Hybrid Machine Learning-Based Fault-Tolerant Sensor Data Fusion and Anomaly Detection for Fire Risk Mitigation in IIoT Environment.基于混合机器学习的容错传感器数据融合与异常检测,用于减轻工业物联网环境中的火灾风险
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;25(7):2146. doi: 10.3390/s25072146.

本文引用的文献

1
Advanced Design of Soft Robots with Artificial Intelligence.具有人工智能的软体机器人的先进设计。
Nanomicro Lett. 2024 Jun 13;16(1):214. doi: 10.1007/s40820-024-01423-3.
2
A Novel Evidence Combination Method Based on Improved Pignistic Probability.一种基于改进的信度概率的新型证据组合方法。
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jun 16;25(6):948. doi: 10.3390/e25060948.
3
Multisensor Data Fusion in IoT Environments in Dempster-Shafer Theory Setting: An Improved Evidence Distance-Based Approach.物联网环境下基于 Dempster-Shafer 理论的多传感器数据融合:一种改进的基于证据距离的方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 28;23(11):5141. doi: 10.3390/s23115141.
4
A New Reliability Coefficient Using Betting Commitment Evidence Distance in Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory for Uncertain Information Fusion.一种基于邓普斯特-谢弗证据理论中投注承诺证据距离的不确定信息融合新可靠性系数
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;25(3):462. doi: 10.3390/e25030462.
5
A Multi-Sensor Data-Fusion Method Based on Cloud Model and Improved Evidence Theory.一种基于云模型和改进证据理论的多传感器数据融合方法
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 7;22(15):5902. doi: 10.3390/s22155902.
6
An Improved Multi-Source Data Fusion Method Based on the Belief Entropy and Divergence Measure.一种基于信念熵和散度测度的改进多源数据融合方法。
Entropy (Basel). 2019 Jun 20;21(6):611. doi: 10.3390/e21060611.
7
Evidence combination based on prospect theory for multi-sensor data fusion.基于前景理论的多传感器数据融合证据组合
ISA Trans. 2020 Nov;106:253-261. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
8
Multi-Attribute Fusion Algorithm Based on Improved Evidence Theory and Clustering.基于改进证据理论和聚类的多属性融合算法。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Sep 25;19(19):4146. doi: 10.3390/s19194146.
9
A Weighted Combination Method for Conflicting Evidence in Multi-Sensor Data Fusion.多传感器数据融合中冲突证据的加权组合方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 May 9;18(5):1487. doi: 10.3390/s18051487.