• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨学科动物研究伦理——挑战、机遇与展望

Interdisciplinary Animal Research Ethics-Challenges, Opportunities, and Perspectives.

作者信息

Mertz Marcel, Hetzel Tatiana, Alex Karla, Braun Katharina, Camenzind Samuel, Dodaro Rita, Jörgensen Svea, Linder Erich, Capas-Peneda Sara, Reihs Eva Ingeborg, Tiwari Vini, Todorović Zorana, Kahrass Hannes, Selter Felicitas

机构信息

Institute for Ethics, History and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.

Section Translational Medical Ethics, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2024 Oct 8;14(19):2896. doi: 10.3390/ani14192896.

DOI:10.3390/ani14192896
PMID:39409845
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11475729/
Abstract

Can nonhuman animals be used for the benefit of humans in a scientifically and morally justified manner and, if yes, how? Based on our own experiences as scholars from various academic backgrounds, we argue that this question can only be answered as an interdisciplinary and international endeavor, considering insights from research ethics and animal ethics as well as scientific and legal aspects. The aim of this article is to contribute to the foundation of the emerging field of animal research ethics. In doing so, we describe the following seven phases of animal research experiments: ethical, legal and social presumptions (phase 0), planning (phase I), review (phase II), conduct of experiments (phase III), publication/dissemination (phase IV), further exploitation of results (phase V), and evaluation (phase VI). In total, 20 key ethical, legal, and practical challenges that an ethical framework for the use of animals in research needs to address are identified and analyzed. Finally, we characterize the following four meta-challenges and opportunities associated with animal research ethics as a field: (1) moral pluralism, (2) the integration of views and positions outside the laboratory, (3) international plurality of conduct, standards, and legal norms, and (4) interdisciplinary education.

摘要

非人类动物能否以科学和道德上合理的方式用于人类的利益?如果可以,该如何做?基于我们这些来自不同学术背景的学者自身的经验,我们认为这个问题只能作为一项跨学科和国际性的工作来回答,要考虑到研究伦理和动物伦理以及科学和法律方面的见解。本文旨在为新兴的动物研究伦理领域奠定基础。在此过程中,我们描述了动物研究实验的以下七个阶段:伦理、法律和社会推定(阶段0)、规划(阶段I)、审查(阶段II)、实验实施(阶段III)、发表/传播(阶段IV)、结果的进一步利用(阶段V)以及评估(阶段VI)。总共确定并分析了研究中使用动物的伦理框架需要应对的20个关键伦理、法律和实际挑战。最后,我们描述了与动物研究伦理这一领域相关的以下四个元挑战和机遇:(1)道德多元主义,(2)实验室之外观点和立场的整合,(3)行为、标准和法律规范的国际多样性,以及(4)跨学科教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b0/11475729/5685afaa1d5a/animals-14-02896-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b0/11475729/9380f292102a/animals-14-02896-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b0/11475729/70544543c4de/animals-14-02896-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b0/11475729/5685afaa1d5a/animals-14-02896-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b0/11475729/9380f292102a/animals-14-02896-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b0/11475729/70544543c4de/animals-14-02896-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b0/11475729/5685afaa1d5a/animals-14-02896-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Interdisciplinary Animal Research Ethics-Challenges, Opportunities, and Perspectives.跨学科动物研究伦理——挑战、机遇与展望
Animals (Basel). 2024 Oct 8;14(19):2896. doi: 10.3390/ani14192896.
2
Ethical Guidance for Disaster Response, Specifically Around Crisis Standards of Care: A Systematic Review.灾害应对的伦理指导,特别是围绕危机护理标准:一项系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(9):e1-e9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303882. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
3
An Occupational Science Contribution to Camouflaging Scholarship: Centering Intersectional Experiences of Occupational Disruptions.职业科学对伪装学术的贡献:以职业中断的交叉经历为中心
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):238-248. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0070. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer: 2006 update.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)癌症贫血患者促红细胞生成蛋白使用指南:2006年更新版
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Jan;43(2):258-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.10.014. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
5
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
9
Responsible research impact: Ethics for making a difference.负责任的研究影响:创造改变的伦理准则。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Mar 31;5:92. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19649.1. eCollection 2025.
10
The ultimate power play in research - partnering with patients, partnering with power.研究中的终极权力博弈——与患者合作,与权力合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00745-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction: Mertz et al. Interdisciplinary Animal Research Ethics-Challenges, Opportunities, and Perspectives. 2024, , 2896.更正:默茨等人。跨学科动物研究伦理——挑战、机遇与展望。2024年,第2896页。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jun 19;15(12):1803. doi: 10.3390/ani15121803.

本文引用的文献

1
Translational bioethics: Reflections on what it can be and how it should work.翻译:转化生物伦理学:对其能够成为什么以及应该如何运作的反思。
Bioethics. 2024 Mar;38(3):187-195. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13263. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
2
Animal research ethics as interaction of research ethics, animal ethics, and (animal protection) law.作为研究伦理、动物伦理与(动物保护)法律相互作用的动物研究伦理
ALTEX. 2023;40(3):541-544. doi: 10.14573/altex.2301171.
3
Transformative medical ethics: A framework for changing practice according to normative-ethical requirements.
变革医学伦理学:根据规范伦理要求改变实践的框架。
Bioethics. 2024 Mar;38(3):241-251. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13185. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
4
Unified ethical principles and an animal research 'Helsinki' declaration as foundations for international collaboration.统一的伦理原则和动物研究“赫尔辛基”宣言作为国际合作的基础。
Curr Res Neurobiol. 2022 Nov 2;3:100060. doi: 10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100060. eCollection 2022.
5
A worldwide survey on the use of animal-derived materials and reagents in scientific experimentation.一项关于科学实验中动物源材料和试剂使用情况的全球调查。
Eng Life Sci. 2022 Jul 18;22(9):564-583. doi: 10.1002/elsc.202100167. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Animal sentience.动物感知能力
Philos Compass. 2022 May;17(5):e12822. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12822. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
7
Reducing surplus experimental animal generation.减少多余实验动物的产生。
Lab Anim. 2022 Jun;56(3):305. doi: 10.1177/00236772221096054.
8
Animal Research that Respects Animal Rights: Extending Requirements for Research with Humans to Animals.尊重动物权利的动物研究:将人类研究的要求扩展至动物
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2022 Jan;31(1):59-72. doi: 10.1017/S0963180121000499.
9
3Rs missing: animal research without scientific value is unethical.“3Rs”缺失:没有科学价值的动物研究是不道德的。
BMJ Open Sci. 2019 Jul 4;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjos-2018-000048. eCollection 2019.
10
A Decade of Organs-on-a-Chip Emulating Human Physiology at the Microscale: A Critical Status Report on Progress in Toxicology and Pharmacology.十年的微尺度人体生理模拟芯片器官:毒理学和药理学进展的关键现状报告
Micromachines (Basel). 2021 Apr 21;12(5):470. doi: 10.3390/mi12050470.