Gauchez Luna, Boyle Shannon Lauryn L, Eekman Shinfu Selena, Harnie Sarah, Decoster Lore, Van Ginderdeuren Filip, De Nys Len, Adriaenssens Nele
Physiotherapy Human Physiology and Anatomy Department (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 1;16(19):3371. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193371.
This review aims to explore the role of physiotherapy in early and traditional palliative care (PC) for oncology patients, focusing on its impact on six patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), namely fatigue, pain, cachexia, quality of life (QoL), physical functioning (PHF), and psychosocial functioning (PSF). The purpose is to assess the effectiveness of various physiotherapy interventions and identify gaps in the current research to understand their potential benefits in PC better.
A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, concluding on 21 December 2023. Two independent reviewers screened the articles for inclusion. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 was employed to assess the risk of bias, while the GRADE approach was used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.
Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, with most showing a high risk of bias, particularly in outcome measurement and missing data. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was the only intervention that significantly reduced fatigue, enhanced PHF, and improved QoL and emotional functioning. Graded exercise therapy (GET) did not yield significant results. Combined interventions, such as education with problem-solving or nutritional counseling with physical activity, showed no significant effects. Massage significantly improved QoL and reduced pain, while physical application therapies were effective in pain reduction. Mindful breathing exercises (MBE) improved QoL but had a non-significant impact on appetite. The overall certainty of the evidence was low.
Physiotherapy can positively influence PROMs in oncology PC; however, the low quality and high risk of bias in existing studies highlight the need for more rigorous research to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.
本综述旨在探讨物理治疗在肿瘤患者早期和传统姑息治疗(PC)中的作用,重点关注其对六项患者报告结局(PROMs)的影响,即疲劳、疼痛、恶病质、生活质量(QoL)、身体功能(PHF)和心理社会功能(PSF)。目的是评估各种物理治疗干预措施的有效性,并找出当前研究中的差距,以便更好地了解它们在姑息治疗中的潜在益处。
于2023年12月21日在PubMed、Embase和Web of Science上进行了系统的文献检索。两名独立的评审员筛选文章以确定是否纳入。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具2评估偏倚风险,同时使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。
纳入了九项随机对照试验(RCT),大多数试验显示出较高的偏倚风险,特别是在结局测量和数据缺失方面。认知行为疗法(CBT)是唯一能显著减轻疲劳、增强身体功能并改善生活质量和情绪功能的干预措施。分级运动疗法(GET)未产生显著效果。联合干预措施,如解决问题的教育或体育活动的营养咨询,未显示出显著效果。按摩显著改善了生活质量并减轻了疼痛,而物理应用疗法在减轻疼痛方面有效。正念呼吸练习(MBE)改善了生活质量,但对食欲的影响不显著。证据的总体确定性较低。
物理治疗可对肿瘤姑息治疗中的患者报告结局产生积极影响;然而,现有研究的低质量和高偏倚风险凸显了需要更严格的研究来证实这些发现并指导临床实践。